Russian doing fly bys over US naval ship in the Black Sea

Digga38

The seperation between what's fake and what's real
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
8,601
Reputation
-1,295
Daps
7,987
Reppin
Dub-C
1. NASA suspends cooperation with Russia over Ukraine crisis — RT News

2. i think we're still in a unique british-american empire era.

3. just like the zionists own america, they own russia too (and even germany). the russian companies that made deals with syria are really owned by russian-israelis. the zionist network got the game locked.
of course we all know they own england through what they did and said with wars in europe. with all the terror attacks over there poppin up in china now you know they comin for niccas over there too. no one's safe :ufdup:.


the zionist empire end up being the greatest empire of all time.
I dont think they own russia on the same level as the US but maybe thats cause US has more assets to own right now.....
so this just gonna end up a war between 2 jewish sects at the end of the day?
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,814
Reputation
-34,193
Daps
620,983
Reppin
The Deep State
it's working as we speak :yeshrug:has been going on for decades. the crash is as believable as the coming of jesus christ.
no wonder no one respects your dumb ass :mjlol: :snoop:[DOUBLEPOST=1397677722][/DOUBLEPOST]
Tommy Knocks giving us that good info:salute:! I really thought Russia's military was :sadcam: status but Putin just sitting in the cut, waiting:birdman:
what info?

We already know Russia ain't no slouch. They provide weapons for their half ot the world, the US/Nato for the other part.

how did you not know this shyt? :what: How old are you?

But people love to front on the US as if we ain't ready to give ANYONE that work.
 

PewPew

I came from nothing
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
2,260
Reputation
1,860
Daps
5,919
Reppin
Earth
no wonder no one respects your dumb ass :mjlol: :snoop:[DOUBLEPOST=1397677722][/DOUBLEPOST]
what info?

We already know Russia ain't no slouch. They provide weapons for their half ot the world, the US/Nato for the other part.

how did you not know this shyt? :what: How old are you?

But people love to front on the US as if we ain't ready to give ANYONE that work.

:whoa: Relax brah! Im not up on Russia's latest developments in missile technology like the sunburn missile that just came out. But im glad you are:rudy:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,814
Reputation
-34,193
Daps
620,983
Reppin
The Deep State
:whoa: Relax brah! Im not up on Russia's latest developments in missile technology like the sunburn missile that just came out. But im glad you are:rudy:
you good. but you made it seem like russia was on like...sudan status :mjlol:

that being said, @Tommy Knocks knows his missile tech...but dude suffers from that anti-USA circlejerk shyt. As if the US should be ashamed of running shyt or being in possession of advanced technology and international influence.

Ain't no rules on the world stage. Gotta get in where you fit in.
 

Tommy Knocks

retired
Joined
Oct 26, 2012
Messages
26,997
Reputation
6,710
Daps
71,614
Reppin
iPaag
you good. but you made it seem like russia was on like...sudan status :mjlol:

that being said, @Tommy Knocks knows his missile tech...but dude suffers from that anti-USA circlejerk shyt. As if the US should be ashamed of running shyt or being in possession of advanced technology and international influence.

Ain't no rules on the world stage. Gotta get in where you fit in.
False. I don't suffer from anything more than educating americans who do not know about Russia tech and assume it's old Soviet shyt. I was once that person and had to get school. All I wrote , in response to people talking about shooting down their planes...was...."You dont want to do that" then the patriots came out in full force to defend massa.
 

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,270
Reputation
3,816
Daps
110,664
Reppin
דעת
Global Insights: Modernization Leaves Russia’s Military Improved but Limited

Although Russia’s defense budget started rising in the mid-2000s, the Russian military’s surprisingly poor performance during the August 2008 war with Georgia served as a critical catalyst empowering reformers to modernize Russian military tactics and procedures. The war highlighted such weaknesses as the slow reaction and mobilization of the Russian army, failures in Russian technical equipment, a lack of air-ground coordination and problems with communications.

Complex Ties: Russia's Armed Forces Depend On Ukraine's Military Industry

Voronov writes that the technical certification is particularly important as even the newest Satan missiles are almost 25 years old and nearing the end of their service lifetime. Moscow needs to keep them operable until 2018 - 2020, when a new Russian-built ICBM, the Sarmat, is due to take their place.

Military experts say that Russia itself could carry out the inspections work on the missiles but that losing the cooperation of Ukrainian factories would be a setback.

Y'all keep listening to Vladimir Knocks though :mjpls: :mjlol:
 

Kritic

Banned
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
8,937
Reputation
500
Daps
5,891
Reppin
NULL
no wonder no one respects your dumb ass :mjlol: :snoop:
as much as the crash can be real banksters will only allow it to happen when they want to.

2. you're the one who no one really takes seriously. and i've sonned you so many times you're stop trying to come up on me. speak for yourself. stop comin with that high school "no one this is that to speak for others'. i already leaned you back so many times i stopped counting. and if you want me to do it here for a quick profit bring it. ain eaten anyone lately. it don't matter which side you want to choose in the argument :win:[DOUBLEPOST=1397683115][/DOUBLEPOST]
Tommy Knocks giving us that good info:salute:! I really thought Russia's military was :sadcam: status but Putin just sitting in the cut, waiting:birdman:
truth be told russia's military is larry holmes status. they don't tease anyone with anything military or consumer lvl on what they're capable of.

the paint job of german tanks alone will make you go :banderas:

when bush senior borrowed some for the kuwait war i knew my arab niccas were gonna die..

and when russia's allies get their ass whoop russia just give up on it like fuq it my chain ain' worth to die for..

Navy to test electromagnetic gun aboard high-speed vessel in 2016 (VIDEO) — RT USA
 
Last edited:

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
89,284
Reputation
3,727
Daps
158,988
Reppin
Brooklyn
well will soon find out wont we...

I doubt Russia would attack a Nato country, that's the only way America would end up at war with Russia.

The economic fallout would be considerable for Russia.

The Russian economy has already contracted and isn't expected to grow at all this year and has had 68 Billion dollars of capital flight in the first quarter.

California has a higher GDP than Russia.


You guys should keep reading whatever blogs you are though.

:heh:
 

Broke Wave

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,704
Reputation
4,580
Daps
44,591
Reppin
Open Society Foundation
Dawg. Every single base in europe is within range of Russia's long range ballistic missiles.

I don't think you're understanding something. Russia will not be fighting. There will not be any planes vs planes, men vs men. It will be button pushing. This is the part I dont think you all understand. Russia military knows it can't take america machine vs machine, so it has focused all it's efforts on ballistic missiles, bombs and warheads.

I dont think you fully understand Russia's military. I don't think you know what type of missiles and bombs they actually have, and how they are vastly superior to ours. We have the tomahawk missile, they have about 3 missiles with greater accuracy and range.

In fact, they just tested the best missile known to man, the Topol, a few days ago to flex.
ITAR-TASS: Russia - Russia's Space defence force tests launch Yars new ballistic missile

List of missiles - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ill leave these lists of missiles here, feel free to study them. Russia have more missiles to destroy all of NATOs bases, whereas NATO does not. That's been a problem with NATO in fact, they don't have enough missiles because they spend so much money on other things such as planes, transportation, tanks, things that can be destroyed by ballistic missiles no problem. Why do you think the U.S was paranoid about the S-300 being deployed in Syria and Iran. That missile alone is one of the most feared missiles on the planet.[DOUBLEPOST=1397664246][/DOUBLEPOST]
and I think you're forgetting Russia and China have done the same. All of those bases are within Russia ballistic range. How do you propose they stop em? Trying to stop Russia's missile system is like trying to stomp asteroids. :heh:

The idea that Russia has a stationary army based on "button pushing" with lethal accuracy will disable all of Americas bases in Europe is actually laughable. When did they develop this capability? Last year? Every single war game from the late Cold War era is about Russia invading Western Europe... how did all of a sudden did they become the single strongest country on earth due to "missile capability" :heh:

You realize missles come from stationary places... that would make them vulnerable targets for... airstrikes. You need to at least post 1 supporting article with regards to Russia's missile prowess being any kind of threat to American power. Just one. I do understand the Sunburn is a lethal weapon but it's only applicable to the ships in the tight range that is the Persian Gulf... in the open ocean it would be impossible to deliver that weapon. You keep talking about Ballistic Missiles but America could deliver tomahawks into Russia within a matter of hours on some Iraq War shyt.... you're talking about Russia attacking every one of America's "defenseless" air bases with no retribution... think clearly for a second man.

I doubt Russia would attack a Nato country, that's the only way America would end up at war with Russia.

The economic fallout would be considerable for Russia.

The Russian economy has already contracted and isn't expected to grow at all this year and has had 68 Billion dollars of capital flight in the first quarter.

California has a higher GDP than Russia.


You guys should keep reading whatever blogs you are though.

:heh:

@Tommy Knocks floated the idea that missile could shoot down a b-2 bomber... that should disqualify him from further conversation.... America has had stealth tech since 1981 and the world still has yet to field a single stealth fighter... how can you shoot down a bomber your radar systems cant even see?

Don't get me started on the drone game :dead: If you're talking conventional war I don't think these nikkas would have the capability to defeat Israel. Real talk.
 
Last edited:

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,149
Daps
279,730
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
The idea that Russia has a stationary army based on "button pushing" with lethal accuracy will disable all of Americas bases in Europe is actually laughable. When did they develop this capability? Last year? Every single war game from the late Cold War era is about Russia invading Western Europe... how did all of a sudden did they become the single strongest country on earth due to "missile capability" :heh:

You realize missles come from stationary places... that would make them vulnerable targets for... airstrikes. You need to at least post 1 supporting article with regards to Russia's missile prowess being any kind of threat to American power. Just one. I do understand the Sunburn is a lethal weapon but it's only applicable to the ships in the tight range that is the Persian Gulf... in the open ocean it would be impossible to deliver that weapon. You keep talking about Ballistic Missiles but America could deliver tomahawks into Russia within a matter of hours on some Iraq War shyt.... you're talking about Russia attacking every one of America's "defenseless" air bases with no retribution... think clearly for a second man.



@Tommy Knocks floated the idea that missile could shoot down a b-2 bomber... that should disqualify him from further conversation.... America has had stealth tech since 1981 and the world still has yet to field a single stealth fighter... how can you shoot down a bomber your radar systems cant even see?

Don't get me started on the drone game :dead: If you're talking conventional war I don't think these nikkas would have the capability to defeat Israel. Real talk.



Yeah, my dude makes it sound like downing stealth planes is easy, the F-117 flew a quarter of a million hours worth of combat sorties, and only 1 was ever shot down.
 
Top