we had greater “power” and “respect” when we were more heavily tied to an institution our oppressor created to make us docile?Anybody who votes for the Republican Party, no matter the candidate, does not like Black people.
It is very interesting, ironic even, our people had more power, self respect and confidence when we were more involved in the Church, than today with the Hardcore Thug image many of our people have gravitated towards.
Do you even know how Senate Reconciliation works? I bet you don't.You gotta be kidding me.
This is a complete lie.
Should have forced Joe Biden out by February at the latest.
Honestly I think Michelle Obama should and could come in and beat Trump.
Sounds crazy but beg Michelle Obama to run for office.
Do you even know how Senate Reconciliation works? I bet you don't.
we had greater “power” and “respect” when we were more heavily tied to an institution our oppressor created to make us docile?
Yep. Speculation based on numerous articles from liberal publications and articles on RBG's legacy. If Dems can't pressure a cancer stricken old lady to retire to save her legacy, what political will do they really have?1st point is just pointless speculation and isn't worth responding to because Obama never nominated any of Trump's picks.
What could have Obama done against McConnell?
Let’s start by saying voting Republican is not the answer
However, I’ve been saying Dems have a huge problem they’ve refused to address. The game plan of waiting until election season to get us on there side is played out
Tryna push each election as the most important ever. Fear voting is played out. We have a couple generations who’ve seen the play & are no longer falling for it. Add in all these foreigners coming over (whether it’s true or not) getting benefits we have to fight for is the nail in the coffin. Perception matters
Now unfortunately because these idiots didn’t do what they needed Trump has a chance to be back in office. That fool political career should have been got packed.
Senate Reconciliation is filibuster proof. Only requires majority vote. Manchin and Sinema were Dems, so my point stands. "Zero Republican opposition".I was highlighting your "zero opposition from Republicans" part. That's bullshyt.
But I'm assuming you're going to come back with the 51 votes thing if a filibuster can be broken.
Then we'll talk about sinema and manchin blah blah blah.
The courts are my interests, and there is a difference between a conservative leaning court and the one I referenced.
to amber rose. There goes my cape verdean
Yep. Speculation based on numerous articles from liberal publications and articles on RBG's legacy. If Dems can't pressure a cancer stricken old lady to retire to save her legacy, what political will do they really have?
Regarding the Garland Pick, Obama and Chuck Schumer could do what Republicans always do, take the other side to court. Senate has a duty to fill SCOTUS seats and their reasoning for not doing so was without any senatorial precedent. Again, lack of politcal will. So again, why expect something different from these guys? We constantly hear about all this power the Republicans have to move mountains, but Dems can't even get their own President's SCOTUS nominee a hearing, nevertheless a vote.
Do you even know how Senate Reconciliation works? I bet you don't.