Restaurant Steak 48 charging a $100 minimum per head

CoryMack

Superstar
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
10,151
Reputation
1,796
Daps
37,045
Clothing emitting offensive odors such as excessive perfume, cologne, tobacco, and or marijuana odors

You nikkas ain’t fixin to smoke your big ass blunts, drown yourselves in expensive cologne/perfume, and then come in here and eat with your loud ass mouths and red ass eyes! Lmao

“And crakkkas tend to smirk, offended by the weed smoke comin off my shirt...”

~ The Immortal Pimp Chad
 

ORDER_66

The Fire Rises 2023
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
146,218
Reputation
15,783
Daps
583,973
Reppin
Queens,NY
it's actually the opposite, you want the highest revenue per table. if people are gonna occupy a table for the same amount of time, why would you want people coming in spending 120 on a table of four when you can have 400 for a table of four? the people who can afford a full meal here are doing fine, this whole pandemic showed the clear division between the classes. the people with high paying jobs who been at home with no where to travel or dine have tons of disposable income, that's who goes to 100/person restaurants

We gon see...:manny:
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
64,976
Reputation
15,880
Daps
265,879
Reppin
Oakland
I didn’t say it was.... if the restaurant sets a minimum of $100(especially per person). then the food and ambience needs to be on some next level shyt
100/person aint next level dining, it's a bunch of michelin star restaurants where you gonna drop 250-500/head...that's next level pricing (i won't say dining as food at that level tends to be very divisive in people's opinion of if it's worth it)
 

frush11

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
20,803
Reputation
2,768
Daps
47,072
Reppin
NULL
it's actually the opposite, you want the highest revenue per table. if people are gonna occupy a table for the same amount of time, why would you want people coming in spending 120 on a table of four when you can have 400 for a table of four? the people who can afford a full meal here are doing fine, this whole pandemic showed the clear division between the classes. the people with high paying jobs who been at home with no where to travel or dine have tons of disposable income, that's who goes to 100/person restaurants

This is a desperation for a restaurant. They losing money.
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
64,976
Reputation
15,880
Daps
265,879
Reppin
Oakland
This is a desperation for a restaurant. They losing money.
restaurants have been operating at a mean L for over a year, hell yea it's desperation - DO NOT COME HERE IF YOU'RE NOT ABOUT TO DO FULL DINING - it's simple. given their steaks a 50-80 - that's just meat, sides are likely 10-20, dessert 15, drink 12-25...it's not a hard ask for customers to spend 100 - get a steak, side, and drink and share 1 app, you're there.
 
Top