My favorite 3 groups all time is Wu, Outkast and De La Soul.
So I'm about as objective as you can get.
Wu did blow up off hard core rap....but NY based hard core rap was the norm in '93. Both "36 Chambers" and Outkast's first album went plat....which is a more feat impressive though?
Let's be real here, most people wasn't f*cking with the South in '94....NY booed 'kast in '95....so instead of looking at "Wu blew up off hard core rap" we need to look at "Outkast blew up at the same time in a NY-centric era, and changed their sound on each album". That's not necessarily a plus or minus for either group but we need to put sh*t into perspective.
I do count the Wu solos as Wu albums, because they feature the same people, and up to a point are all produced by Rza.
Wu's strength was building a foundation that to this day still exists....and I don't mean just the group, I mean the brand, the sound, impact, etc....they are basically rap's version of The Rolling Stones.
Outkast is the exact opposite. They didn't rely on one foundation or sound, they completely uprooted their sound 5x and started from scratch. The second Rza switched up (that Bob Digi sh*t) he lost fans.
To me, Outkast's career has been more impressive. What's funny is people say they crossed over, sold out, whatever on "The Love Below" (and I hate that album)....but who sounded like that at the time? It's easy to point fingers now, after the sh*t went diamond. But at the time it was so left field that Prince literally called up Andre like "the f*ck are you thinking?".
The same can be said for "Speakerboxxx". Any album that has songs like "Bust" and "The Rooster" on it definitely ain't trying to cross over. Not on purpose anyway.
Fred.