Racists already mad on Twitter due to commercials

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,713
Reputation
555
Daps
22,615
Reppin
Arrakis
Yes i believe the US is on autopilot. We're on a crash course to make Spanish a secondary language once latin americas population goes POW!!!! and eventually whites will want to succeed from all the latino's like those french wanted to get away from English speakers. It cant be stopped. This white mans world wont last forever bruh.

yeah i think that is what a lot of people want to happen, but i never cosigned that pathway for the US, so that is why i dont cosign multiculturalism

but yeah if you have thought about it and you have no problem with that future, then thats fine

people were trying to say i was exaggerating that it would decrease social cohesion but you seem to accept that ramification so your position is logical
 

gho3st

plata or plomo
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
34,670
Reputation
2,795
Daps
83,367
Reppin
2016
Yes i believe the US is on autopilot. We're on a crash course to make Spanish a secondary language once latin americas population goes POW!!!! and eventually whites will want to succeed from all the latino's like those french wanted to get away from English speakers. It cant be stopped. This white mans world wont last forever bruh.
:mindblown:


You from LA, im surprised you dont agree with dude.
 

bsmooth

All Star
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
2,980
Reputation
560
Daps
6,488
Reppin
NULL
are you that naive that you think the us is in auto pilot? the policies we implement today effect the future, if you say english and spanish should be treated the same that will change the future, if you havent thought about the ramifications of that then you shouldnt go along with it just because it causes white tears, if you want to see what bilingual policies look like look at canada, which despite what people say almost did break up over language


Canada did not almost break up over language, it was a constitutional issue. Most of what you've mentioned through this thread about Canada is just plain wrong and you need to stop citing Canada as some failure of multiculturalism. Multiculturalism has been great for Canada.
 

Crakface

...
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
18,500
Reputation
1,530
Daps
25,708
Reppin
L.A
:mindblown:


You from LA, im surprised you dont agree with dude.
I wasnt born here and im powerless to stop any major changes this nation is going to go through as a result of population increases. The United States is going to lose some states to latinos and im sure eventually white folks will want to fight or build a wall and get some 2nd generation house negro latinos to step up and put a leash on their people. Good times ahead.
 

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,713
Reputation
555
Daps
22,615
Reppin
Arrakis
Canada did not almost break up over language, it was a constitutional issue. Most of what you've mentioned through this thread about Canada is just plain wrong and you need to stop citing Canada as some failure of multiculturalism. Multiculturalism has been great for Canada.

yes it did almost break up, and i already proved it, there was a vote in 1995 where half the people in quebec voted to secede, the fact that yall went through hoops to prevent it proves that it almost happened

canada almost broke over language thats just a fact, they have cabinet meetings discussing the possibility of secession, thats just a fact
 

Crakface

...
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
18,500
Reputation
1,530
Daps
25,708
Reppin
L.A
Canada did not almost break up over language, it was a constitutional issue. Most of what you've mentioned through this thread about Canada is just plain wrong and you need to stop citing Canada as some failure of multiculturalism. Multiculturalism has been great for Canada.
http://www.nytimes.com/1990/03/24/world/language-again-threatening-to-split-canadian-federation.html

For the second time in 10 years, Canada is caught in the throes of an emotional and divisive debate over its future as a united country. Once again, the issue is language. For the moment, the tone - in either French or English - is pessimistic.

The immediate issue being debated across the land on these brisk early spring days is the Meech Lake Accord, named for this secluded frozen lake where the agreement was forged in a guest house three springs ago.

The accord was intended once and for all to establish a protected place within the Canadian confederation for the French-speaking province of Quebec, where a quarter of Canada's 26 million residents live.

Initially the accord was accepted by all 10 provincial Premiers and by Prime Minister Brian Mulroney. But as the ratification deadline nears, three provinces are withholding or withdrawing their support. Amid passionate bilingual debate and much domestic shuttle diplomacy, English-speaking Canada and an economically confident Quebec are openly considering a future without each other, although nothing drastic would happen immediately after the June 23 deadline.

The debate has put the Progressive Conservative Government on the defensive, created unease and a mounting sense of crisis and underlined anew the centrifugal forces always lurking beneath the surface of this disparate land, where even the national anthem has two distinctly different lyrics, one in English, the other in French.

Ten years ago, when Quebec voters soundly defeated a referendum proposing negotiations for a vaguely defined separation from Canada, the idea of Canada's largest province going its own way - and physically separating the remaining Canadian provinces -horrified most Canadians.

Today, the idea of Quebec's drifting into its own world is widely discussed and often treated with a regretful shrug. Some newspaper articles even seem to take separation as a given, analyzing the economic prospects of a stand-alone Quebec.

''Better a divorce, I think, than a marriage in name only,'' said Mordecai Richler, the Canadian novelist. ''Canada is supposed to be a country, not a convenience store.''

The Meech Lake constitutional agreement established a legally bewildering array of carefully cobbled compromises that declared Quebec ''a distinct society'' and gave provinces new powers while seemingly weakening the federal Government.

The accord did get Quebec to sign the Constitution. But faced with two provinces' recalcitrance and continuing pressure from his own political opposition, the Parti Quebecois, Quebec's Premier, Robert Bourassa, cannot appear to give any more.

In Closed Sessions

And politicians in English-speaking Canada hear growing grumbles about special recognition and protection for Quebec with no mention of special treatment for their local groups, like Indians, Eskimos and women. They point out that the accord was forged in closed sessions and presented with the caveat that nothing could be changed.

To take effect, the accord requires ratification by Parliament and all 10 provincial legislatures within three years of the first ratification, Quebec's on June 23, 1987.

Parliament and seven provinces followed Quebec. To pressure the holdouts, Manitoba and New Brunswick, Mr. Mulroney and his Cabinet have raised the possibility of Quebec abandoning Canada, destroying its multicultural self-image and leaving English Canada presumably to drift dangerously near the American orbit. Some of its opponents invoke the same specter, suggesting that the Meech Lake Accord would weaken the Canadian federation to the point where it could end up being absorbed by the United States.

Fear of the United States swallowing a land 10 percent larger than itself has historically been a potent political weapon in Canada, which was created by Britain in 1867, when the newly victorious Union Army was the world's largest and the Americans had just leapfrogged Western Canada to buy Alaska from Russia.

Recently Meech Lake supporters heard Newfoundland's Premier, Clyde Wells, vow to rescind his province's ratification. Mulroney Cabinet members say negotiations are under way to secure the approval of Manitoba and New Brunswick in hopes that Newfoundland will opt not to stand alone. [In a brief nationwide television address on Thursday night, Mr. Mulroney announced that he would introduce in Parliament a parallel accord on the concerns of other groups of Canadians, like women and natives. The strategic hope is to diffuse the Meech Lake opposition with a separate accord that would not need to be passed by every legislature in the next three months.] Guarantees for Quebec Among other things, the accord requires the federal Government to name future Supreme Court judges from provincial lists of nominees. It also guarantees Quebec three of the nine seats, plus a significant role in immigration there.

Polls indicate that few Canadians understand the Meech provisions. But the long discussion itself became a huge handicap. It gave every conceivable opponent ample time to organize.

It has also provided time for economic self-confidence to grow within Quebec's young business community where eager entrepreneurs once wondered about their survival in a political separation from Canada and now have experienced 15 months of general success under the new Free Trade Agreement with the United States.

At the same time Premier Bourassa, looking toward his next election against the Parti Quebecois, initiator of separatist proposals in the mid-1970's, defied a Supreme Court ruling and prohibited any outdoor signs in English. This may have debatable practical effect in a province where a sign is considered French when it reads: ''Le Bar Nashville La Musique Country.''

But in distant, less populous parts of Canada, the largest minorities by far speak Chinese, Cree or Ukrainian. Though they have no special linguistic protection, they have quietly accepted Quebec's special status.

''In English Canada, the sign bill reeked of bad faith,'' said Peter C. Newman, a prominent author. Since the fight began, more than 100 communities have declared themselves ''English only,'' a defiant snub that has little practical impact but strikes an emotional chord in Quebec.

Appropriately enough, Meech Lake is named for Asa Meech, an American minister who built a house on it. Long before his name became synonymous in two languages with discord, he was buried here beneath a snow-covered tombstone that says with historic foresight, ''I ask not to stay where storm after storm rises o'er the way.''




:usure:
 

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,713
Reputation
555
Daps
22,615
Reppin
Arrakis
these canucks are delusional, country is breaking up around them and they're here posting on a message board, yall need to go handle things lincoln style and crush the rebellion and get those french out of the western hemisphere
 

Crakface

...
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
18,500
Reputation
1,530
Daps
25,708
Reppin
L.A
Once the United States overpopulates the french will be kicked out of quebec and new land will be settled for the United States to take the population burden off the cities.
 

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,713
Reputation
555
Daps
22,615
Reppin
Arrakis
if you want to co-opt what i said just to say you're agreeing with something that's the opposite of what you said, then you've just up-ended the entire point of internet forums, and discourse in general

and you do realize how fascist you sound, yeah? american english speakers can argue all they want about the merits of learning english in this country, but immigrants aren't stupid and the most ambitious ones are going to learn the language to the best of their intellectual and financial abilities out of sheer practicality, not because some native-born american citizens decided it was a good idea for the sake of nationalism.

just curious, how much have you done to promote english education in this country? have you sponsored anyone applying for an F-1 Visa, donated time or money to english language schools, or sat down and taught someone to speak english?

its basic economics and psychology that people will do what they are incentivised to do, if there is an economic incentive to learn english then people will learn english, its that simple, im not even talking about ambitious immigrants im talking about just ordinary people, typically in the us an immigrant is under huge pressure to learn english for economic and social reasons, english has always been part of becoming an american, how you want to describe that pressure its up to you, but the point is that pressure existed, i was agreeing that the pressure to learn english exists

the point im making is that under multicultural policies that pressure will decrease and therefore the rate of english assimilation will decrease which will in turn decrease social cohesion

i always press one for english, that is how i promote english
 
Last edited:

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
89,212
Reputation
3,727
Daps
158,827
Reppin
Brooklyn
Once the United States overpopulates the french will be kicked out of quebec and new land will be settled for the United States to take the population burden off the cities.

funny thing is the French don't want them

:heh:
 

Crakface

...
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
18,500
Reputation
1,530
Daps
25,708
Reppin
L.A
funny thing is the French don't want them

:heh:
They're alone out here. They better stay as close to them west indians as possible because after the US takes the east portion of Canada, its only a matter of time before all those lame white boys in Quebec start embracing and endorsing the American swagger that will infiltrate their borders and Crush their drab culture into Dust!

iQj6m4rkyHDAn.gif
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
lets be real about what's going on, most people in this thread saw a bunch of white racists complaining and you assumed right away that you had to be against it and enjoy the white tears, but the problem is you havent really thought it all the way through

lets be real, none of yall have really thought about the ramifications of or the motivations behind @Type Username Here and @Brown_Pride talking about there is no english language requirement in the constitution, the implication is that the us should stop discouraging non english speakers and actually encourage non english speaking, in other words they think latino and other immigrants should be treated different than italian or polish immigrants that came in the 20th century

yall are focusing on white tears but none of yall have thought about the implications of having a canadian type of structure that encourages immigrants to keep their culture and none of yall have thought about the implications for the social cohesion of the country by encouraging multiple languages and multiple cultures

and a lot of black peolpe havent thought about going for a job interview and being told you have to speak a foreign language, (apparently this is considered progress by some)

there is no evidence anywhere on the planet that encouraging multiple languages and multiple cultures helps a country advance, its only in the us where you have massive integrationist forces that dilute people's original culture and language where diversity sort of works, anywhere else from canada, belgium, nigeria or india its been a failure

and i repeat, due to the fact that we are non homogenous society its doubly important to encourage a common language and common culture
lol you're argument is that since we treated other immigrants like shyt and forced them to do a certain thing the ALL immigrants should be treat like shyt?
:comeon:
 
Top