Racists already mad on Twitter due to commercials

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,713
Reputation
555
Daps
22,615
Reppin
Arrakis
I never said language was different from culture or ethnicity. But the specifics of French/British relations stems deeper than language. That's all im saying.

you arent saying anything that is relevant to the overall point im making

whatever "deeper" points you think quebec has, it would still apply to the issue of how the us deals with people of different languages

cuz the overall issue is, are we going to deal with languages (or ethnicity or history) the way canada does of making other languages equal to english and having separate cultures or are we going to go the traditional american route of making English supreme and having one overall culture
 
Last edited:

bsmooth

All Star
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
2,980
Reputation
560
Daps
6,488
Reppin
NULL
language and history are inextricably linked, so when somebody says language most people including historians conflate that with ethnicity and history

this issue of making a distinction between language and history is just some shyt yall pulled out your ass cuz you saw me connecting the dots between the multiculturalism in canada and the coke commercial, so like the little intellectual bytches that yall are yall started this ridiculous idea that language is somehow separate from ethnicity and history, a notion which is basically absurd

You're just completely wrong and out of your league when talking about the Quebec issue, it's a constitutional/political issue with a legal precedence, there's no basis in any comparisons you're trying to make to contemporary language issues in America. Stop pretending like you have some kind of actual knowledge on the issue because you googled a sensationalized news article from an American newspaper in 1990 discussing Canadian politics.

The Quebec issue doesn't even have relevance to this conversation, you're trying to make points about how immigrants should conform so why are you talking about a debate, which you ignorantly claim is all about language, that has been ongoing in Canada for hundreds of years. If you were to talk to a Canadian about multiculturalism the English/French debate would not even be mentioned, it's a complete non-issue for virtually everyone. The discussion at hand is about how newcomers should act or be welcomed to a country and multiculturalism in Canada has shown to be a successful model with immigrants integrating into society much better than most countries and especially the United States.
 

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,713
Reputation
555
Daps
22,615
Reppin
Arrakis
You're just completely wrong and out of your league when talking about the Quebec issue, it's a constitutional/political issue with a legal precedence, there's no basis in any comparisons you're trying to make to contemporary language issues in America. Stop pretending like you have some kind of actual knowledge on the issue because you googled a sensationalized news article from an American newspaper in 1990 discussing Canadian politics.

The Quebec issue doesn't even have relevance to this conversation, you're trying to make points about how immigrants should conform so why are you talking about a debate, which you ignorantly claim is all about language, that has been ongoing in Canada for hundreds of years. If you were to talk to a Canadian about multiculturalism the English/French debate would not even be mentioned, it's a complete non-issue for virtually everyone. The discussion at hand is about how newcomers should act or be welcomed to a country and multiculturalism in Canada has shown to be a successful model with immigrants integrating into society much better than most countries and especially the United States.

i did not google or post the article originally, the article is a legit article, there is nothing wrong or sensational about the article, its pointing out the history of secession issues canada has, trying to discredit it just because you disagree with it is corny and anti intellectual

and you are wrong, it is very much relevant to the issue of language in america, not just canada but belgium, india, nigeria also are examples of how to deal with or not deal with language

the fact that quebec issues dont matter to you or dont matter to canadians doesnt mean anything, i dont really care either

but the point is the situation of quebec should be studied as to what happens when you elevate a minority language to the same level as the majority language and what happens when you provide constitutional and legal protections to cultures and languages

some people in the us are suggesting that spanish should be treated equal to english for example, it stands to reason that we should study other countries to see what the consequences of such actions are, that is why i brought up quebec
 
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
260
Reputation
240
Daps
503
You said there was a referendum because of language differences and you're wrong. French and British hostility in North American began in the 17th century and Britain's takeover of French Canada cemented that rivalry. They wanted to split because of that along with their cultural differences. In hindsight it wasn't because of language differences. So you're the one that needs to have a seat.

I never said language was different from culture or ethnicity. But the specifics of French/British relations stems deeper than language. That's all im saying.

:ld:If you take it down that route, you're gonna end up supporting the argument that a dominant and common language plays a major role in maintaining social cohesion within a country. Britain also took over French territory in present-day U.S. during that same war, but areas with a significant population of French descendants in the states don't seem to have those "cultural differences" that seems to plague those Quebecois who insist on preserving the French language in a nation that is predominately English-speaking. A dominant common language is important because it is a basic form of natural assimilation.
 

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,713
Reputation
555
Daps
22,615
Reppin
Arrakis
:ld:If you take it down that route, you're gonna end up supporting the argument that a dominant and common language plays a major role in maintaining social cohesion within a country. Britain also took over French territory in present-day U.S. during that same war, but areas with a significant population of French descendants in the states don't seem to have those "cultural differences" that seems to plague those Quebecois who insist on preserving the French language in a nation that is predominately English-speaking. A dominant common language is important because it is a basic form of natural assimilation.

the truth shall set you free breh

in america, french do not speak french, germans do not speak german, polish do not speak polish etc etc,

so it follows american tradition that spanish, arabic and Tagalog should also fall off the ends of the earth like all those other corny ass european languages, canada fuked up by letting the french bacteria into the system

aside from english there is nothing special about any language in america, they can all get it and they should get it
 
Last edited:

bsmooth

All Star
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
2,980
Reputation
560
Daps
6,488
Reppin
NULL
i did not google or post the article originally, the article is a legit article, there is nothing wrong or sensational about the article, its pointing out the history of secession issues canada has, trying to discredit it just because you disagree with it is corny and anti intellectual

and you are wrong, it is very much relevant to the issue of language in america, not just canada but belgium, india, nigeria also are examples of how to deal with or not deal with language

the fact that quebec issues dont matter to you or dont matter to canadians doesnt mean anything, i dont really care either

but the point is the situation of quebec should be studied as to what happens when you elevate a minority language to the same level as the majority language and what happens when you provide constitutional and legal protections to cultures and languages

What is the extent of your knowledge on Canada's political history outside of that article?
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
89,211
Reputation
3,727
Daps
158,827
Reppin
Brooklyn
the truth shall set you free breh

in america, french do not speak french, germans do not speak german, polish do not speak polish etc etc,

so it follows american tradition that spanish, arabic and Tagalog should also fall of the ends of the earth like all those other corny ass european languages, canada fuked up by letting the french bacteria into the system

aside from english there is nothing special about any language in america, they can all get it and they should get it

You know about as much about the world around you as mowgli does. Log off.
 

Benjamin Sisko

Still that resident truth-bringer
Supporter
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
23,572
Reputation
5,565
Daps
90,296
Reppin
NO


white people didn't complain about this commercial, notice the difference.

Because it supports white supremacy.

Racists will low-key support this type of advertising, because, in their minds, the black man is losing again. The wm has a right to every woman in every culture in the world, thus, this will support the white supremacist agenda. That's why theres no hate, unlike a black man procreating with a white woman.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
32,692
Reputation
2,910
Daps
71,385
Reppin
Yeah
Because it supports white supremacy.

Racists will low-key support this type of advertising, because, in their minds, the black man is losing again. The wm has a right to every woman in every culture in the world, thus, this will support the white supremacist agenda. That's why theres no hate, unlike a black man procreating with a white woman.
They hate it :ahh:
 

Marvel

Psalm 149:5-9
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
8,804
Reputation
813
Daps
15,171
Reppin
House of Yasharahla
Because it supports white supremacy.

Racists will low-key support this type of advertising, because, in their minds, the black man is losing again. The wm has a right to every woman in every culture in the world, thus, this will support the white supremacist agenda. That's why theres no hate, unlike a black man procreating with a white woman.

Bada-bing...bada-boom
 
Top