fukk yes4 years is an ERA to you?
the covid era? pre-covid seems like a lifetime ago
Last edited:
POTUS or Prisoner; The '24 Trump Campaign Fvckery thread
- Thread starter the cac mamba
- Start date
the covid era? pre-covid seems like a lifetime ago
Trump will destroy America for the next 4 years and his VP pick will win the election on the MAGA populist wave as long as he or she is not too crazy because the Democratic party will be a broken mess.no it wouldnt. trump would spend those 4 years acting like a huge fakkit, and the dems' 28 bench would easily win in '28. it wouldnt be the end of the world
and if we're thinking that far out, are you willing to concede that biden/harris '24 probably means a red wave in '28?
Biden winning in 2024 does not guarantee a red wave in 28. Because we still don't know what the Republican party will look like by 28. There's no guarantee that they will reform and become a normal party again. Once Trump leaves the stage, Trumpism will remain and someone attempt to clean it up and mold it into something presentable for 28.
Also, 28 would also depend on who the Democratic nominee is. If it's Kamala Harris, the Republican nominee will rack up 350 electoral votes on her.
trump is not gonna "destroy america" any more than he did from 2017-19; which he did not, in any way, shape or form. he would do some bad things, probably replace Thomas, and a lot of things liberals don't like, but stop giving him so much fukking credit
i mean you just said "trump will destroy america for 4 years, and then his VP will win in '28". what the fukk does that even mean? that's Maddow babble
Last edited:
With Trump's record of insanity on the line, Trump only lost the 2020 election by 44,000 votes. Against any other opponent Trump would have won re-election.trump is not gonna "destroy america" any more than he did from 2017-19; which he did not, in any way, shape or form. he would do some bad things, probably replace Thomas, and a lot of things liberals don't like, but stop giving him so much fukking credit
i mean you just said "trump will destroy america for 4 years, and then his VP will win in '28". what the fukk does that even mean? that's Maddow babble
The Republican party only needs margins to win. Not majorities.
nah, Biden is functionally the most effective democrat since...FDR?i've accepted that biden is the worst incumbent we'll ever see in our lifetimes. unless he really does have to step down in the next term, and kamala takes over
Imaging he's not Obama or even Clinton...but in terms of policies, this is a historical period we're living through
you dont need to do this ignorant white boy contrarian shyt... look Biden isn't the strongest but he's not a bad president.because he can't even make the campaign promise that he'll live through his term
also, only unemployment and infrastructure objective wins from that list. which are offset by:
-"bidenflation"
-gas prices
-hunter's corruption that biden obviously played a part in. i guess 'but jared kushner' is cool, if we're no better than republicans
-endless senior moments
-an awful VP who's "a heartbeat away"
-a 35 percent approval rating
i'm not up in arms about biden running again, but america just wants to fukkin move on from the 2020-2023 era
Nah, LBJ was more effective. The sheer amount of structural changes he made to the country are astounding, not just the legislation, but also executive orders that stand to this day.
But Biden is definitely the most effective since.
its not THAT bad tho. A lot of this is social media driving complaints but on average people are chillingyeah, technically, but that excuse didn't work out for Carter in 80. people are tired of this shyt
where the hell did i say biden is a bad president
and i was pushing biden, while contrarians like you were pushing losers like elizabeth warren. dont give me that bullshyt
i agree that with trump running on cheap gas, biden needs a better message on gas prices than "just go buy an electric car"
Piff Perkins
Veteran
trump is not gonna "destroy america" any more than he did from 2017-19; which he did not, in any way, shape or form. he would do some bad things, probably replace Thomas, and a lot of things liberals don't like, but stop giving him so much fukking credit
i mean you just said "trump will destroy america for 4 years, and then his VP will win in '28". what the fukk does that even mean? that's Maddow babble
Funny how you casually left a certain year out of your statement. I wonder why. What could have possibly happened in that year to suggest Trump is an existential threat, uniquely unqualified to be president and his return to office could be a complete disaster.
The thing about 44k votes is largely irrelevant to me. The bigger question to me is: show me a path where Trump wins MI, PA, and WI. There is no path, which is why he will lose in 2024. Last year's election effectively doomed him. Democrat governors and secs of state in all three states, two of which have significantly increased early voting access already. Good luck.
a once in a 100 year, ridiculously fluke pandemic? uh, yes, i left that out of my statement
Trump shut down Americaa once in a 100 year pandemic? uh, yes, i left that out of my statement
the republican only has to win GA, AZ, and WI. if we're completely certain these are blue states, then hey
zero to worry about
you supported shutdowns. glad you agreed with trumpTrump shut down America