I've said repeatedly that Zo is a better offensive player. I don't even like Dwight, but he's put up the same offensive numbers throughout his career. It's ugly as hell and he can be erratic, but that gap isn't that wide between the two.
Zo's rookie year was the best of his career in the playoffs. After that he was giving you between 18-22 in his prime...just like Dwight. It's not like his teams had more success in the postseason either.
Dwight put up offensive numbers against worse big men, why do you just keep glossing over that? Zo didn't need shooters at 4 other positions just to give him room to get off post moves, how much more do you think Zo would have scored with the spacing Dwight had
How was Zo's rookie year his best year? He averaged better numbers the following year and put up 23/10/3/2/1 another year. Dwight wouldn't do shyt against Patrick Ewing and you know it, this nikka is averaging 13ppg over his entire career against Marc Gasol