They probably spent 1.3 billion on marketing in fairness.
Film needs to make 3.3 billion to break even I heard.
WW is an icon, if the Republican government doesn't seriously reconsider it's stance on equal pay because of this flick it's a flop.
They probably spent 1.3 billion on marketing in fairness.
Film needs to make 3.3 billion to break even I heard.
based on her acting (or lackthereof) in BvS, i think its pretty much up to the laughs from pine (which im sure will be a okay for the hypocritical DC stan brigade) to save the dayThis is DC/WB, brehs. We should all be worried about the actual quality of the movie before we even bother to give a shyt about its box office.
thats why i got that idiot on ignore.knew someone would ask this stupid question. naturally it's your dumbass. do you have stock in DC? I'm lost. 3 of those movies are a 5-decade old first of all. No one even knew who the hell Antman was... if Wonder Woman - a huge budget blockbuster comic movie - can't ride the wave of the MCU/Batman/XMen movies that came before her, and only opens to Antman numbers, that would be a massive disappointment. The studio isn't looking for Antman numbers for someone as iconic as Wonder Woman.
I said people expecting a wonder woman film to do batman numbers when it's an unknown quantity are wrong.you said wonder woman can't do big numbers, that's not a baseless claim?
I said people expecting a wonder woman film to do batman numbers when it's an unknown quantity are wrong.
There has never been a wonder woman film,so EXPECTING it to do the same numbers as one of the biggest comic properties ever in film is wrong.
Never once said it can't. Anything can.
But saying it SHOULD be competing with the top is false. There is no evidence to suggest the properties power at the box office.
Guardians of the galaxy has nothing to do with wonder woman.okay well guardians 2 just did 150 mil opening weekend.
would i be a fool if i expected the first ever wonder woman movie to compete with guardians of the galaxy? is that more fair?
I personally love that Ant-Man/Thor/Cap/Guardians are getting compared to the likes of Supes/Bats/WW/JL.based on her acting (or lackthereof) in BvS, i think its pretty much up to the laughs from pine (which im sure will be a okay for the hypocritical DC stan brigade) to save the day
thats why i got that idiot on ignore.
no point in wasting brain power or bandwidth with someone equating the status of antman to wonderwoman
How on earth would a 65 million opening be a flop?
It's like there's different sets of rules for different studios for some of you.
A 65 opening would put it's opening above
Thor
Hulk
Captain America
Ant man
And doing so with a budget smaller than all of those.
And 65 is the lowest tracking. Other places have it at 100 million.
But yall can't help but show your stanning and only post the lowest one.
How on earth would a 65 million opening be a flop?
Maybe, here is my girl Grace a known DCEU stan pissed and worried about this movie.GTFO do we srsly have to explain how a 65 million opening for wonder woman would be a flop
TFR needs you bro don't do that.This movie will make 100M+ OW
I'll bet my account on it
You really think this movie will make 65M OW?
sure
TFR needs you bro don't do that.
So when captain America 1 made less was that a flop?GTFO do we srsly have to explain how a 65 million opening for wonder woman would be a flop
Guardians 2 opened that high because the first one was good and the MCU is up there with Star Warsokay well guardians 2 just did 150 mil opening weekend.
would i be a fool if i expected the first ever wonder woman movie to compete with guardians of the galaxy? is that more fair?