Official Trump Insurrection Rally 1/6/21 Fukkery, NY Probe, DOJ Probe & Georgia Probe Thread!

Payday23

Superstar
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
14,942
Reputation
1,546
Daps
55,875
Those were his responses to the oath keepers and Bannon.

We know he convicted Bannon for two counts.

The oath keepers leaders trial for seditioud conspiracy is currently under way.

There's a difference between healthy skepticism and just being a contrarian.
Bannon got what a few months and still is out on appeal which is months away. I'm not being a contrarian. I'm being a realest. How's meadows and scavino contempt cases going? Any normal person does what Trump has done they're in federal prison for decades. There's example after example of this. I'll gladly eat crow but 2 years after his presidency we're still waiting for an indictment on any charge.
 
Last edited:

Payday23

Superstar
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
14,942
Reputation
1,546
Daps
55,875
He's not being skeptical. He's just assuming everything is bullshyt and denying the realities that happen.

In the last week he's argued:

Garland appointed a special counsel so he doesn't have to make the decision.

Then he argued, the special counsel is irrelevant because Garland is making the decision.

:pachaha:


He then criticized folks for falling for propoganda like they did during the Mueller investigation and then immediately cites Claude Taylor's brainchild "Rawstory."

He's too far down the Rabbit hole.

Most objective people view most of these cases as ultimately leading to a letdown because it's highly unlikely for Trump to be convicted even if he's indicted because the same voters Payday23 says are a lost cause (his family and peers) aren't going to vote to convict him.

The idea that GOP leadership should all be indicted and arrested isn't even good fantasy, yet he's in here pushing that.

But it doesn't matter he's going to continue moving the goal post no matter what happens.
Way to twist my words. I've consistently said garland doesn't want to indict Trump. He's had the time and evidence to do it immediately following his presidency. He knew Trump was going to run, so instead of indicting him for current crimes(the ones he let go untouched for 1.5 years or expire) he punts it to a special counsel who will report back to him what he's already known and should've done long ago. That Trump should be indicted. Doj didn't even start investigations into J6 until the select committee dropped bombs and witnesses. DOJ even asked for their information. The spin you guys put on it would make the DC insiders blush.
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
45,702
Reputation
6,870
Daps
145,751
Reppin
CookoutGang
Way to twist my words. I've consistently said garland doesn't want to indict Trump. He's had the time and evidence to do it immediately following his presidency. He knew Trump was going to run, so instead of indicting him for current crimes(the ones he let go untouched for 1.5 years or expire) he punts it to a special counsel who will report back to him what he's already known and should've done long ago. That Trump should be indicted. Doj didn't even start investigations into J6 until the select committee dropped bombs and witnesses. DOJ even asked for their information. The spin you guys put on it would make the DC insiders blush.
Your end goal is just to indict someone.

I imagine his goal is to bring forth a case that can be won.






I dunno. Seems like you just aren’t going to be happy. The way you frame everything is as if they have no desire to hold people accountable when we have plenty of evidence suggesting by otherwise.


the doj even has a site you can go through to track individual cases. There’s a lot:

 
Top