they aint tryna hear you doe
buti actually liked julian mcmahons a$$holeish doom. he was the best thing out of both movies. that and kerry washington
? Considering I'm currently posting in here I feel I should ask 
"Doom . . . what's on your evil mind?"
the people who its for will know its for themWho's that directed at brotha man
I guess the main reason I just dont feel like the villains are as "underwhelming" as so many say... cuz truthfully I just feel they are just "on par" with everything else. And I'm not saying its good or bad...... but just is what it is.
I just find it ridiculous when cats come down hard and try to bash them for this but then look away and be like
When other franchise suffer from the same thing or make the same mistake.
Marvel shouldnt be held to a HIGHER standard than others.... they should ALL be held to the same standard.
So the way I see it dont see here tell me Malekith (and no its not all about him but for the sake of discussion just using him as a discussion point) is all that terrible and is the worst thing anyone has ever seen
When we've seen;
2 cloud villains
,
a shytty clayfaced thing,
this acid or decay guy,
everyone in the last 2 ASM movies
and last but least (and this one hurts me to my soul) but ever incarnation of this guy on the big screen
I'll pay attention to said attack that day when those doomb bots have 4 different billie movies attached to their name. While also the catalyst for an entire studioNaw you good @Ironman I know you not attacking me and even if so.... you cant hurt me.... all you doing is punching out Doom Bots if so
You dont want them problems from the house of Doom
Whether is you, JB, or even the good brother PS, I know its not attacks.... I dont mind and love honest discussion. Like if yall ever see me talk, yall should notice I never disrespect no one or call them stupid or dumb, or curse them and call them childish names.
Its just discussion, this fun and play play but its discussion too and I appreciate from whomever
For the record though.... if I was to attack you I wouldnt attack you with words I'd attack you with the power we've acquired from Silver Surfer or Galactus
The OG Superman movies..... well for the most part were great.... everyone LOVED them and no one harps on the villains.
Everyone LOVES Blade one and 2...... but I bet dont remember shyt about the villains in them "Blades just fought some vamps and was BAD ASS"
Everyone loves the Toby Spideys.... but even his villains werent all that.... people just loved him and to see him in his suit
So on one end, I get it... but on another. I feel the argument is overplayed and people use it to distract the narrative or try to take some points from it.
I think its more of an issue when youre hero is lackluster, boring, and cant carry the film..... cuz at the end of the day.... it aint the villain emblem or shield they promoting..... its the hero. He spose to be the iconic face of the movie franchise who is the face of the comic source
I can't agree with anything you wrote in the bold.
Stephen dorff was deacon frost.
For the time Gene Hackman's Lex Luthor was very well received...sure he is playing a more hokey, Silver Age version of Luthor but no one ever complained about him. And Zod was universally praised.
Ethan Hawke was not my cup of tea but I don't think there was a consensus that he was horrible as Deacon Frost and Jared Nomak in Blade 2 was cool as shyt.
Willem Dafoe was really good as Norman Osborn until they put him in that Power Ranger villain suit and everyone loved what Alfred Molina brought to the role of Doc Ock.
The Spiderman movie villains didn't suck until Spiderman 3.
I get him and Ethan Hawke mixed up all the time.
I legit thought sam Worthington and James badge dale were the same person for a while
.JPG/revision/latest?cb=20130524082420)
