Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
I routinely have 80-100+ Alerts.
I'm well aware of Irwin Winkler's law suit. He claimed the movie made $275 million total. In 2014. Meaning it took 24 years to do more than what "TMNT" did in it's initial run. So how was it more profitable?
Also keep in mind you have no idea if these numbers are even true, as they settled out of court. According to WB the movie never even broke even.
AMC is showing "Parasite" 5 minutes away from me.
Also there's an Alamo Drafthouse in Brooklyn. Again, where exactly do you live?
You're talking about genres, I'm talking about quality.
You seriously think Scorsese was happy with "Goodfellas" being blown out of the water by "3 Men And A Little Lady"?
Let alone "Total Recall", which was an "amusement park" film from that era.
Which again is my point. "Goodfellas" was the best film on that list by a wide margin....yet it's nowhere near the most successful.
Fred.
Breh.... you just got done saying the movie flopped. It's budget was $25M. If the number of $275M is anywhere close that is a huge profit and it's still making money and will always make money. It was just on what AMC the other day lol.. it's always on.
I don't know if he was just talking home video sales either, WB makes money on the TV rights, as far as what the actual numbers are we will never know because according to major studios movies are never a "profit"..
Disney, WB, all these studios claim that their movies don't make money. It takes lawsuits and digging from places like Deadline and estimates to determine what the profits "likely" are..
WB claimed Harry Potter didn't make money
I don't know how Scorsese felt about Total Recall but I can tell you there was more thought put into Total Recall than most movies you see in the mainstream today. Mainstream has never been worse.