He basically made a movie about people capturing things on the gram for cloutGet Out: Racism
Us: Classism
Nope: Exploitation for profit
Nope used animals and a flying beast to make some obvious points about our need to capture everything on video and corporations turning it into profit. If you missed that, then the movie just isn’t for you. That doesn’t mean it sucks, it just means things weren’t spelled out and took some thought to appreciate.
*Multiple characters risked their lives to profit from capturing video of something that threatened their lives and ended up killing them.
*The tv show and movie didn’t respect the animals and it used them for profits. In the case of the former, it ended in tragedy. Jupe used that tragedy for profit even though on some level the chimp identified with him as an exploited child actor. Jupe was obviously traumatized but profited from selling trauma. (gangsta rap, news, etc.) OJ respected animals and didn’t like using them to make money and wanted to buy back the horses he sold for profit because he felt guilty about it. Think guilt ridden slave owner freeing his own slaves. TMZ just wanted to sell the spectacle as did Jupe.
Great film. Not interested in debates. Just giving my take.
He basically made a movie about people capturing things on the gram for clout
i never typed what you quoted.One theory I saw was that he might have had a terminal illness that was slightly conveyed in his ramblings. He was stuck doing lame commercials at his age and point in his career and he reasoned he could get post-mortem fame by sacrificing himself for that last great shot.
Not sure if anyone touched on this, but likely another defense mechanism. If the threat seems bigger that the organism, it in turn tries to make itself bigger. I think it first turned into that form with all of the car lot tube men in the valley. They were there to signal it’s presence but the sheer number of those eyes looking at it could’ve been a threat of it being outnumbered. The huge floating balloon at the park was a threat simply from its size. The permanent stare of the balloon made it attack.
Another thing..did y’all see the green square that kept projecting when it was in the final form. I read that that could’ve been the eye of the organism.
Logan Paul's review
He's basically another one of these "no no i GOT the movie...but i have 45 questions...so it's trash". Clearly some people are ashamed to admit this basic ass movie outsmarted them.
i'm saying that people are calling the movie trash because it went over their heads, but they wanna save face by saying "no...i GOT it...but i still have a bunch of questions....it's trash". Then when they ask their questions and call things plot holes, people answer all their questions then they go "yeah well Jordan Peele should have explained that"...when it was clearly explained in the movie. One example, Logan Paul said something about how come nobody in the movie questioned how a quarter killed the dad...first of all it was a nickel, second in the movie they thought it was from falling debree from a plane. People clearly weren't paying attention or they saw shyt happening on the screen and it's like they thought the characters were just doing random shyt.I don't get this argument. Are y'all really trying to say if you understand what a movie is going for then that means it's good? That would imply every movie is quality as long as someone gets it but I doubt I would see y'all in here defending something like Firestarter. I support the brother but this is his worst movie yet in my opinion. It just fell apart about half way through.
random UFO/alien didn't give a backstory of what it was or why it was on earth.So... Wtf is the cloud then?
i'm saying that people are calling the movie trash because it went over their heads, but they wanna save face by saying "no...i GOT it...but i still have a bunch of questions....it's trash". Then when they ask their questions and call things plot holes, people answer all their questions then they go "yeah well Jordan Peele should have explained that"...when it was clearly explained in the movie. One example, Logan Paul said something about how come nobody in the movie questioned how a quarter killed the dad...first of all it was a nickel, second in the movie they thought it was from falling debree from a plane. People clearly weren't paying attention or they saw shyt happening on the screen and it's like they thought the characters were just doing random shyt.
i'm saying that people are calling the movie trash because it went over their heads, but they wanna save face by saying "no...i GOT it...but i still have a bunch of questions....it's trash". Then when they ask their questions and call things plot holes, people answer all their questions then they go "yeah well Jordan Peele should have explained that"...when it was clearly explained in the movie. One example, Logan Paul said something about how come nobody in the movie questioned how a quarter killed the dad...first of all it was a nickel, second in the movie they thought it was from falling debree from a plane. People clearly weren't paying attention or they saw shyt happening on the screen and it's like they thought the characters were just doing random shyt.
Yea those people are weirdos. Just cuz a piece of art was going for something provocative doesn't mean it a good movie. Those quoted sound like its coming from people who smell their own fartsI don't get this argument. Are y'all really trying to say if you understand what a movie is going for then that means it's good? That would imply every movie is quality as long as someone gets it but I doubt I would see y'all in here defending something like Firestarter. I support the brother but this is his worst movie yet in my opinion. It just fell apart about half way through.