Rapmastermind
Superstar
RT doesn't review movies though.
The overall consensus for this movie was that it wasn't as bad as bvs but it was still flawed.
People say they enjoyed it but then proceed to point out glaring flaws.
You can't have it both ways.
You can say the iron man sequels and Thor movies were bad but you can't say they were all over the place. They had a?theme/message that was effectively executed.
My only point is that Marvel flaws aren't taken seriously, they always use the "Good out weight the Bad" but with DC they aren't afforded that same luxury. That's what a Bias is, you judge something differently for one thing than the other. Let's look at Marvel 1st 5 Scores VS DC:
IM1 93% (Fair and nobody would argue that)
TIH 66 % (They can't be serious, this film had major issues and Marvel fans don't even acknowledge it today which is why Mark is playing Hulk)
IM2 73% (I guess I can slightly agree, I think it's closer to 60 than 75)
CATFA 81% (Fair but the film also had some flaws so it's more like a mid 70's)
Thor 77% (Nope, way too high)
Average: 78%
This show me that the critics gave Marvel a lot of leeway as they were starting out. They were giving passing to flaws in the films but it didn't effect the overall scores.
MOS 55% (MOS was LIGHTYEARS better than Superman R which got a better RT score)
BVS 27% (This score is when my antenna started to go off, something was fishy)
SS 26 % (Noticing a pattern yet?)
WW 93% (This was a checkmate, they couldn't do it again, everyone was on to them)
JL 37% ()
Average: 47.8%
This isn't about saying DCEU was flawless or perfect it's about seeing inconsistencies of judging one comic book movie verse the other. Also people love to bring up Box Office Success with Marvel. The Numbers already show DCEU is pacing way head of marvel for the 1st 5 Films.