ExodusNirvana
Change is inevitable...
Breh...he is not related to Thomas Wayne...Jokers mother was delusional and Joker is delusional himself...that's the pointI was driving so I couldn't give a real review at the moment. But for me it basically came down to his origin story not making sense with the Joker that we've known him as in all the other movies/cartoons/comics etc
The movie should be called "Arthur"
That's my biggest issue. Gotham knows who he is. So it's like why even call him joker? Every other story joker was always a mysterious character that no one knew about, now all of Gotham knows it's Arthur? All of Gotham knows his story? Why is Joker so transparent when he's the least transparent person in the DC universe?
There wasn't much going on in this movie except Joker being disturbing and doing a bunch of laughing and dancing.
And my other biggest gripe is the whole Joker / Bruce possibly being related thing. Just thought it was silly to even throw the idea out there to begin with , whether it's true or not true. But also, I always thought Joker and Batman we're close in age. Why is Joker in his 40's while Bruce is still a kid? By the time Bruce grows up Joker would be Bernie Sanders status.
But yeah, I left the theater feeling the movie was lackluster and left more to be desired. I did like the acting though.
A great deal of the movie takes place IN HIS HEAD....the Joker is insane...he will concoct a story that makes HIM the victim when really he is just a monster