Adam3000
-
I'll put it in spoilers so that way people can scroll past what I got to say like
I don't want to be that guy and nitpick the episode for people that liked it.
First off I don't read the books. So anything I say is strictly about the show....and I guess by extension the books.
The show tries so hard to go against the grain that it's becoming predictable. "The grain" being the usual happy "good guys win" Hollywood bullshyt. After 4 seasons anytime I see a new interesting character that seems halfway decent I assume they'll die a horrible death. I swear to God I had a convo earlier in the day....and I called the fight ending more or less exactly how it did. I knew Obreryn would die, and he'd die horribly, and it would somehow undermine the Trial By Combat, thus keeping Tyrion in danger. That's G.R.R. Martin 101 at this point.
So the reasons you're saying....nah. They've been pulling the same okey-doke since Ned Stark, and I don't want some happy shyt because I want the Lannisters to catch an L....I want anything beyond the usual "introduce/prop up a decent character....oh they're dead" routine going on 4 seasons. "Nobody is safe" is cool but eventually somebody has to be safe, or else death means nothing, because you always expect it. Or at least let off the gas pedal a bit, then catch people slipping. Beloved characters catching Ls late in the season is a cliche at this point.
"Oh look, he died". That's basically how I watched that fight. Not trying to start a stan war but "The Wire" pulled off the "nobody is safe" shyt better, without it seeming like borderline trolling.
It's whatever. I'm not gonna stop watching but I hope at some point G.R.R. Martin understands that if everyone is constantly in danger that becomes as meaningless as nobody ever being in danger.
Fred.
I agree I don't want to clog this thread with annoying bickering so I will drop this one reply just to try and get you to look at it a different way. If you want to respond feel free, I won't drag out my argument any further. I am a believer that in the end, everything will come together and serve as a piece to the puzzle and until it all ends we can not fully digest individual moments on this show.
Once again though like I said to another dude, every "against the grain" death has served a thematic purpose. There has not been a single shock death in this series other than Catelyn. They all have a purpose. Even the bad guy deaths serve a larger purpose (Joffrey would never have been killed if an equally sadistic younger brother was next in line for the throne).
Because these deaths all serve a larger purpose to drive a major plot element, I'm not sure I agree with the implications you are making.
You use The Wire as an example, but the majority of major character deaths in that show were not necessary, to drive a plot element. They were merely used to illustrate gritty realism and were the very definition of shock deaths. So saying that The Wire did "nobody is safe" better is an odd criticism of GoT
You say you predicted that Oberyn was gonna die, but are you being disingenuous? We were presented with reasons for him to live, and reasons for him to die, and we were confronted with a war of our hearts and minds as to what we believe was going to happen. If Oberyn had lived, would you have said "HOLY shyt I thought for sure he was going to die, this show continues to surprise me!"? I highly doubt it, and if my suspicions are correct than your reaction is a bit disingenuous.
If we focus on the good guys that die, we are forgetting all the good guys who have lived. Jon, Dany, Tyrion, Bran, Sansa, Arya, Sam, etc. Oberyn was a side-character. He was introduced in Season 4 and had a total of like 20-30 minutes of total screen time until that fight. It was our choice as viewers to attach ourselves to him and make him out to be something he was not. He is a Prince of Dorne who came to King's Landing to seek vengeance for his murdered relatives. Thats it. He very well could have been a character that book readers and show watchers hated for all GRRM knew when he published the story 15 years ago.. We personally built those expectations.
Because these deaths all serve a larger purpose to drive a major plot element, I'm not sure I agree with the implications you are making.
You use The Wire as an example, but the majority of major character deaths in that show were not necessary, to drive a plot element. They were merely used to illustrate gritty realism and were the very definition of shock deaths. So saying that The Wire did "nobody is safe" better is an odd criticism of GoT
You say you predicted that Oberyn was gonna die, but are you being disingenuous? We were presented with reasons for him to live, and reasons for him to die, and we were confronted with a war of our hearts and minds as to what we believe was going to happen. If Oberyn had lived, would you have said "HOLY shyt I thought for sure he was going to die, this show continues to surprise me!"? I highly doubt it, and if my suspicions are correct than your reaction is a bit disingenuous.
If we focus on the good guys that die, we are forgetting all the good guys who have lived. Jon, Dany, Tyrion, Bran, Sansa, Arya, Sam, etc. Oberyn was a side-character. He was introduced in Season 4 and had a total of like 20-30 minutes of total screen time until that fight. It was our choice as viewers to attach ourselves to him and make him out to be something he was not. He is a Prince of Dorne who came to King's Landing to seek vengeance for his murdered relatives. Thats it. He very well could have been a character that book readers and show watchers hated for all GRRM knew when he published the story 15 years ago.. We personally built those expectations.