i'm pretty sure a sword through his heart would be all the dna he needs
stannis ain't coming to talk this out... i'm pretty sure he's on a mission to murder everyone in that kingdom that doesn't bow down to him
You right
i'm pretty sure a sword through his heart would be all the dna he needs
stannis ain't coming to talk this out... i'm pretty sure he's on a mission to murder everyone in that kingdom that doesn't bow down to him
I see the lannisters song all the time. I don't think any are official house songs. I never hear any other called "song" but the lannistersI think Ramin Djawadi does all the scores for GoT. The ones with lyrics are done by other artists. You got a link to those themes though? Only one I found was Dany's theme.
People gonna act like they don't remember this hoe shyt from hillbilly jamie
Ned should have had better bodyguards.
How ya man Jory Cassel dispatch several Lannister mooks only to get knifed in the eye so quick?
Stark stans still crying about their hero Ned's reign on top being shorter than leprechauns
Are brienne and pod going to the vale??
I mean don't tell me if it wasn't revealed. But I'm watching again. They talked about it, then there was a fork. Pod wasn't sure. But they never said which direction was which and what they chose
i wasnt sure either. i think they kind of implied it but didnt make it clear.
I thought they did make it clear that they were going to the Vale.
Upon a rewatch of that scene, however, I see it's up for interpretation. I'd bet my left nutsack that they're going to the Vale tho.
yea its heavily implied but they dont make it a point to say its definitely the vale. im sure it is tho. not for any book reasons cause their storyline is straying from the books but just because they were just talking about how arya's only relative living is her aunt lysa or jon at the wall but then hot pie said the hound stole her. so they know he aint gonna ransom her to jon snow.
:lolJ:
:courtumad:
what do these things have to do with stannis?
get shyt on by a non-book reader brehs
u lookin like :dunkface:
A lot of dudes need to realize that Ned's outmoded sense of honor is not a good character trait, it is an unfortunate and detrimental part of his character. Ned's insistence on following a code of conduct only he believes in has clearly made the lives of most westerosians much worse than they would have been if Ned had swallowed his pride and practiced some real politik.
Being a leader is about making tough choices. Always following a dated moral code allows you to cop out of true tough choices (renly vs stannis) and act like you are a strong person by making easy choices look tough (beheading the deserter).
This show flips a lot of fantasy tropes on their heads and it seems like the honour bound is the one people pick up on the least.
In what twisted world is a positive moral code a bad character trait? This is just beyondA lot of dudes need to realize that Ned's outmoded sense of honor is not a good character trait, it is an unfortunate and detrimental part of his character. .
Beyond the fact that this is flat out false due to the fact that he is beloved in the North which is the one place he ACTUALLY ruled, just looking at the rest of Westeros this is a clear deflection. A "blame the victim" mentality. The others around him are morally lower than pond scum and starting wars and commiting murders and treasons and you are blaming the one person who did nothing wrong.Ned's insistence on following a code of conduct only he believes in has clearly made the lives of most westerosians much worse.
Ned is only a leader in one place, the North. He only became Hand in order to figure out Jon Arryn's killer. He then quit the Hand and was forced back by Robert. He was not a southern 'leader' by choice, so he needs not to be held to any standards of any other southern leaders.Being a leader is about making tough choices. .
This is not a question of morality. This is a question of the law. Stannis is King by law. Calling laws 'moral codes' is laughableAlways following a dated moral code allows you to cop out of true tough choices (renly vs stannis)
.
First off Ned isn't 'acting' like anything by beheading the NIghts Watch deserter. Second off, Ned is not doing anything to make the choice look tough. He made it very easy. The guy deserted the Nights Watch, Ned took his head off. Simple as that. This is a strange thing to say and it seems like you are just pulling stuff out your ass on that one.and act like you are a strong person by making easy choices look tough (beheading the deserter).
.
This is some dumb ass shyt from top to bottom.
I'm not even sure I want to respond any further to this. What a garbage argument.
In what twisted world is a positive moral code a bad character trait? This is just beyond
Beyond the fact that this is flat out false due to the fact that he is beloved in the North which is the one place he ACTUALLY ruled, just looking at the rest of Westeros this is a clear deflection. A "blame the victim" mentality. The others around him are morally lower than pond scum and starting wars and commiting murders and treasons and you are blaming the one person who did nothing wrong.
First off, Ned is only a leader in one place, the North. He only became Hand in order to figure out Jon Arryn's killer. He then quit the Hand and was forced back by Robert. He was not a southern 'leader' by choice, so he needs not to be held to any standards of any other southern leaders.
This is not a question of morality. This is a question of the law. Stannis is King by law. Calling laws 'moral codes' is laughable
First off Ned isn't 'acting' like anything by beheading the NIghts Watch deserter. Second off, Ned is not doing anything to make the choice look tough. He made it very easy. The guy deserted the Nights Watch, Ned took his head off. Simple as that. This is a strange thing to say and it seems like you are just pulling stuff out your ass on that one.
IN SUMMARY:
Its false to say that Ned does what is right every time. We don't know that. We know his honor is strong, but we see a very small snapshot in his life. But I digress...Okay, I'll slim it down for you.
We're talking about doing what is right vs. doing what needs to be done.
Ned chooses to do what is right every time.
This isn't a good thing.
Keep in mind the concept of right isn't absolute.
Its false to say that Ned does what is right every time. We don't know that. We know his honor is strong, but we see a very small snapshot in his life. But I digress...
What honorable thing does Ned do that is wrong? By telling Cersei about his plans that was not about honor, it was about not wanting the murders of 3 children by Robert on his hands.
His mistake was in trusting other people, not in honor. This is where your argument falls apart at the seams. Trusting other people to be honorable is a mistake, not a character flaw.
Your concept of what is a good and bad thing is twisted so badly. Good and Bad do not mean the same thing as Smart and Dumb