R.E.N. Spells Ren
Veteran
No one will bring up that scene after the next episode.
I will....any, and every time someone tries to paint Jamie as anything other than the despicable, shameful, repugnant fakkit he is.
No one will bring up that scene after the next episode.
why did i read this just after peeping the latest terry richardson articleSometimes you just gotta take the p*ssy
whats that supposed to mean
And brehs...I haven't seen any outcry about the rape or that Jamie is raping Cersei.
I have seen an outcry against the writers and actors who try to make the scene appear to be consensual. The actor playing Jamie says "yes and no" in response to a question asking if it's rape. The writers stating outright "by the end it's consensual." You can't watch that scene and tell me that it's not rape
It's rape. And it's not even debatable.The fact that she started kissing him back and sounded like she was getting off on it, and even caressing him made it not rape. If all she was doing was trying to claw away from him and run, and he straight up took it anyways, then it's rape. You don't kiss someone back if it's rape.
you do know that if that scenario happened in 2014, jamie would be facing time, right?The fact that she started kissing him back and sounded like she was getting off on it, and even caressing him made it not rape. If all she was doing was trying to claw away from him and run, and he straight up took it anyways, then it's rape. You don't kiss someone back if it's rape.
It's rape. And it's not even debatable.
It was rape.
It's better than in the books. At first she said "No" but Jamie was going to rape her anyway and THEN she said to do it right before penetration.
Regardless of what she said in the book or the show, she was getting fukked. Jamie was not going to rip her clothes off and then wait for permission to finish the deed, regardless of what book readers may think. So it's an accurate reflection of the character Jamie AND it actually goes counter to the dangerous idea that "no actually means yes" that the book seems to support. The director should have kept his fukking mouth shut like the writers did and not try to make it seem like the clear rape scene was consensual.
You're an idiot.So if you get raped are you gonna tongue kiss the nikka back? Are you gonna make passionate noises and caress the nikka too? These feminists have pussified the fukk outta you guys that you can't even call it what it really is. It's like your petrified and can't just be real and admit she was enjoying it. She may not have wanted to do it by the dead body but you can tell she wanted to fukk.
You're an idiot.
How dense do you have to be? He's ripping her clothes off, forcing himself on her, she's screaming "no", and Jaime says "I don't care." But it's not rape?Nice retort.You can't argue against my points because you're a pussified fakkit and deep down you know you're wrong.
you do know that if that scenario happened in 2014, jamie would be facing time, right?So if you get raped are you gonna tongue kiss the nikka back? Are you gonna make passionate noises and caress the nikka too? These feminists have pussified the fukk outta you guys that you can't even call it what it really is. It's like your petrified and can't just be real and admit she was enjoying it. She may not have wanted to do it by the dead body but you can tell she wanted to fukk.
How dense do you have to be? He's ripping her clothes off, forcing himself on her, she's screaming "no", and Jaime says "I don't care." But it's not rape?
GRRM even commented on the changes on his blog today. So....like i said. You're an idiot.