Official Black Panther MCU Thread

loyola llothta

loyola llothta

☭☭☭
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
34,997
Reputation
6,971
Daps
79,930
Reppin
BaBylon
Realdealholy said:
Universal is sharing him? Hmm...

Namor as a "villain" would be great. Then, when thanos and infinity war part 2 arrives, maybe he and BP could team up against a common foe?
Click to expand...
i think its the same thing with the Hulk. Marvel might not use Namor any time soon
 
Erik Killmonger

Erik Killmonger

TRUE KING OF WAKANDA
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
1,282
Reputation
290
Daps
5,089
:patrice:

IGN: Finally, there were rumors circulating awhile back that Universal and Legendary Pictures were developing a Sub-Mariner movie, but there was also some confusion about who holds the rights to the character. So could Legendary make that movie at this point?

Feige: No.

IGN: So if a film were to happen it would be you guys making it?

Feige: Yes, but it’s slightly more complicated than that. Let’s put it this way – there are entanglements that make it less easy. There are older contracts that still involve other parties that mean we need to work things out before we move forward on it. As opposed to an Iron Man or any of the Avengers or any of the other Marvel characters where we could just put them in.
 
loyola llothta

loyola llothta

☭☭☭
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
34,997
Reputation
6,971
Daps
79,930
Reppin
BaBylon
Omar27 said:
:patrice:

IGN: Finally, there were rumors circulating awhile back that Universal and Legendary Pictures were developing a Sub-Mariner movie, but there was also some confusion about who holds the rights to the character. So could Legendary make that movie at this point?

Feige: No.

IGN: So if a film were to happen it would be you guys making it?

Feige: Yes, but it’s slightly more complicated than that. Let’s put it this way – there are entanglements that make it less easy. There are older contracts that still involve other parties that mean we need to work things out before we move forward on it. As opposed to an Iron Man or any of the Avengers or any of the other Marvel characters where we could just put them in.
Click to expand...
marvel working with such less
 
notPsychosiz

notPsychosiz

I started this gangsta sh-
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
7,638
Reputation
2,900
Daps
21,909
Reppin
dogbornwolf
loyola llothta said:
i think its the same thing with the Hulk. Marvel might not use Namor any time soon
Click to expand...
When I was working at Activision around the time we did Marvel Ultimate Alliance, Universal owned the Hulk license (thats why we couldn't use him originally and had to put in dumb ol Colossus cause we needed a bulk role). I don't know what the present situation is with the Hulk license
:yeshrug:
 
notPsychosiz

notPsychosiz

I started this gangsta sh-
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
7,638
Reputation
2,900
Daps
21,909
Reppin
dogbornwolf
He Who Posts Well said:
Old school superheroes trying to advance :camby:
Click to expand...
tumblr_m9yo14BUN21rtkqf9.gif
 
Birnin Zana

Birnin Zana

Honorary Wakandan
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
6,106
Reputation
1,570
Daps
22,953
Reppin
Wakanda
Coates on what the new BP book will be about :

“Wakanda is really the light of the world, in the Marvel Universe. And yet it's a system of governance that has not advanced beyond the idea of blood-rule,” says Coates. “It’s always seemed to me that T’Challa was aware of this discrepancy. Among the monarchs of Marvel—Namor and Doctor Doom for instance—T’Challa has always been distinguished to me by his discomfort on the throne, and with the problems of one-man rule. I am very much looking forward to exploring that tension.”
Click to expand...

Ta-Nehisi Coates Takes on Black Panther | News | Marvel.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top