People in this thread are really serious with this move Hardy to DT for some plays stuff:dahellwhat:
This guy has not played damn near a season and a half of football...comes in and is so dominate at the end position it completely changed the way NE, probably the best team in the NFL right now, played. They went damn near exclusively to screens and rub plays for no other reason than Hardy was getting to Brady in about 2 seconds flat...and fresh off that the fist thing people want to do is move him to DT for some snaps:dahellwhat:
What is the logical sense in that? What is the logical sense in taking a guy who just had one of the most productive halves of football any DE has had all year, and want to move him to another position for even one play:dahellwhat:
I'd rather have 3 of our 4 best pass rushers on the field with one of them playing in a premier spot the entire game where he can be dominant than have 4 of our best pass rushers in the game and have a guy play out of position where he would still be very good but not dominant...
Gregory and Lawrence would have to show me they can consistently dominant the tackle one on one for me to be okay with moving Hardy inside...because every play you move him inside and the DE does not get any real rush it is just going to be a waste...because as we saw sunday Hardy is going to get a real rush way more often than not