UpAndComing
Veteran
Political theater lol
"This board has been overrun with MAGA bootlicks go jump off a bridge you piece of shyt"You're not looking at it broadly. The undecided voters see what happened to Trump makes him look 'badass' or like a fighter. It looks like the complete opposite of what a lot of people see in Biden. They see Biden moving slow and talking how he does, meanwhile Trump survives a grazing, stood up and raised his fist in the air with blood on his face.
This is absolutely a Time magazine cover.
The majority of people are driven by how they feel, and what people see is a former President raising his fist in the air after being shot. They feel like he looks powerful, strong and unfazed. He doesn't look like a weak old man. He looks like a fighter.
Hitler won his election that gave the Nazi party powerhitler looked strong too in his nazi rally speeches, giving very energetic speeches, and then he killed millions of people
The only votes trump is winning with this one is the lowest IQ demographics of those who weren't voting yet.
Hitler never won an election lol. He did relatively well in the presidential election and lost. He was appointed chancellor as a result because the Nazis were becoming more popular, but they never got the plurality or majority from voting.Hitler won his election that gave the Nazi party power
I got a friend group text with 4 people in it and one guy was so upset Trump didn't get his wig split and die and kept saying it hoping one of the 3 of us would say the same. No one did. lol
Hating anyone to the point you want to see them die is demonic. I can't get there on anyone including Trump.
Regardless of who, it sounds like you’re saying he won some votes.
I don’t like Trump at all, but I feel like people are viewing things solely through their own lens, by saying this didn’t help him.
Wow, you're really upset. But you mistake me for someone who gives a fukk. lolTrump sat back eating McDonald's and cheering in front his TV when an angry mob of his supporters were burning down Capitol Hill, raising a noose outside the building, and looking for his own Vice President to execute him.
A put out a brazen hit piece on the Central Park 5, encouraged police officers to "not be nice" and beat up folks a lil, and had peaceful George Floyd protestors shot at with rubber bullets like animals before raising a Bible in the air like an idiot.
Constantly stoking up fantasies of a civil war in his name and boasting that his side has all the guns and will win.
To this day he still refers to his murderous, treasonous, January 6th rioters as patriots being "treated unfairly" who he will immediately pardon.
And lets not forget his willful mishandling of covid. Admitted in private inter iews he knows the virus is a killer but like the sociopath he is he blatantly lied to the public just to get re-elected, and got millions killed in his pursuit of power.
I don't wanna see no one die, but you gotta be some type of "is we sick boss" p*ssy ass c00n to be concerned at all for that racist fat fukks life. The man is an aspiring aithortarian fascist who would absolutely hurt and take the lives of you and others just for sadistic sport or personal gain. Some deranged right wing pro-gun nut job tries to clap him at one of his shytty rallies while he's going on one of his usual genocidal rants about immigrants, and I'm suppose to "wish him well" like Tariq Nasheed and his c00n followers?
Tell your friend he needs to stop hanging out with ignorant Uncle Tom cowards who "like Trump" but can somehow find a mouthful to say about "racist Joe Biden" and find friends that share his values and passion about government and society.
Not true. There is always a certain percentage of people who are not hardcore democrats or republicans, and will vote either way.
And go and look up how many white women voted for Trump, even over Hillary.
You're wrong.Perhaps if you're talking Mitt Romney vs Obama or sumn. I actually never heard anything about Romney that made he think he was a
bad person.
Maybe like day 1 of Trump's first campaign perhaps one could be "undecided" about him. Personally.
By the time of the first election he ran in, everyone knew how much of a liar, abuser, and crook he was.
And now we know intimately how evil and stupid he is.
If you can vote for Trump you are definitely decided. You've decided that a person with no morals and low intelligence should be prez despite everything he's done, any one of which would have cancelled any other politician.
Or. If you believe in basic decorum and competence you will try to stop Trump. Biden has flaws but he's done a fine job and he will continue to (even if they have to tell him whih chair to sit in and have Jill move his hand to sign things).
The five universal laws of human stupidity
By Corinne PurtillApril 29, 2017
In 1976, a professor of economic history at the University of California, Berkeley published an essay outlining the fundamental laws of a force he perceived as humanity’s greatest existential threat: Stupidity.
Stupid people, Carlo M. Cipolla explained, share several identifying traits: they are abundant, they are irrational, and they cause problems for others without apparent benefit to themselves, thereby lowering society’s total well-being. There are no defenses against stupidity, argued the Italian-born professor, who died in 2000. The only way a society can avoid being crushed by the burden of its idiots is if the non-stupid work even harder to offset the losses of their stupid brethren.
Let’s take a look at Cipolla’s five basic laws of human stupidity:
Law 1: Always and inevitably everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation.
No matter how many idiots you suspect yourself surrounded by, Cipolla wrote, you are invariably lowballing the total. This problem is compounded by biased assumptions that certain people are intelligent based on superficial factors like their job, education level, or other traits we believe to be exclusive of stupidity. They aren’t. Which takes us to:
Law 2: The probability that a certain person be stupid is independent of any other characteristic of that person.
Cipolla posits stupidity is a variable that remains constant across all populations. Every category one can imagine—gender, race, nationality, education level, income—possesses a fixed percentage of stupid people. There are stupid college professors. There are stupid people at Davos and at the UN General Assembly. There are stupid people in every nation on earth. How numerous are the stupid amongst us? It’s impossible to say. And any guess would almost certainly violate the first law, anyway.
Law 3. A stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person or to a group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even possibly incurring losses.
Cipolla called this one the Golden Law of stupidity. A stupid person, according to the economist, is one who causes problems for others without any clear benefit to himself.
The uncle unable to stop himself from posting fake news articles to Facebook? Stupid. The customer service representative who keeps you on the phone for an hour, hangs up on you twice, and somehow still manages to screw up your account? Stupid.
This law also introduces three other phenotypes that Cipolla says co-exist alongside stupidity. First there is the intelligent person, whose actions benefit both himself and others. Then there is the bandit, who benefits himself at others’ expense. And lastly there is the helpless person, whose actions enrich others at his own expense. Cipolla imagined the four types along a graph, like this:
VINCEDEVRIES
Stupidity, graphed.
The non-stupid are a flawed and inconsistent bunch. Sometimes we act intelligently, sometimes we are selfish bandits, sometimes we act helplessly and are taken advantage of by others, and sometimes we’re a bit of both. The stupid, in comparison, are paragons of consistency, acting at all times with unyielding idiocy.
However, consistent stupidity is the only consistent thing about the stupid. This is what makes stupid people so dangerous. Cipolla explains:
Essentially stupid people are dangerous and damaging because reasonable people find it difficult to imagine and understand unreasonable behavior. An intelligent person may understand the logic of a bandit. The bandit’s actions follow a pattern of rationality: nasty rationality, if you like, but still rationality. The bandit wants a plus on his account. Since he is not intelligent enough to devise ways of obtaining the plus as well as providing you with a plus, he will produce his plus by causing a minus to appear on your account. All this is bad, but it is rational and if you are rational you can predict it. You can foresee a bandit’s actions, his nasty maneuvres and ugly aspirations and often can build up your defenses.
With a stupid person all this is absolutely impossible as explained by the Third Basic Law. A stupid creature will harass you for no reason, for no advantage, without any plan or scheme and at the most improbable times and places. You have no rational way of telling if and when and how and why the stupid creature attacks. When confronted with a stupid individual you are completely at his mercy.
All of which leads us to:
Law 4: Non-stupid people always underestimate the damaging power of stupid individuals. In particular non-stupid people constantly forget that at all times and places and under any circumstances to deal and/or associate with stupid people always turns out to be a costly mistake.
We underestimate the stupid, and we do so at our own peril. This brings us to the fifth and final law:
Law 5: A stupid person is the most dangerous type of person.
And its corollary:
A stupid person is more dangerous than a bandit.
We can do nothing about the stupid. The difference between societies that collapse under the weight of their stupid citizens and those who transcend them are the makeup of the non-stupid. Those progressing in spite of their stupid possess a high proportion of people acting intelligently, those who counterbalance the stupid’s losses by bringing about gains for themselves and their fellows.
Declining societies have the same percentage of stupid people as successful ones. But they also have high percentages of helpless people and, Cipolla writes, “an alarming proliferation of the bandits with overtones of stupidity.”
“Such change in the composition of the non-stupid population inevitably strengthens the destructive power of the [stupid] fraction and makes decline a certainty,” Cipolla concludes. “And the country goes to Hell.”