Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
That's not counting NXT where the women's division has been and easily one of the highlights of that show. A few of you need to take a step back and ask yourselves what it is you are trying to argue..
Who's asking anybody to do better though? People are hating on divas era women like they just never tried or something. Yall forget women like Mickie, & Melina came from that era? Even alot of ones that weren't 4HW level still tried. Specifically the Bellas. Nikki isn't great but to completely shyt on her and try to ignore her contributions to this whole women's revolution thing just because she came from a certain era isn't 100% revisionist history.It's "hate" to ask women to string a few moves together without botching or string some sentences together without sounding like a robot? Women's matches and talk segments get praised on here a lot more than any other board I've seen..
Just from this year Sasha/Asuka, Asuka/Charlotte, Charlotte/Becky, Ruby/Sasha all received quite a bit of credit for being good matches. Ronda has been praised for her efforts. Alexa and Carmella have been praised for their character work.
If you want to treat women as equals then that means they are also going to have to deal with a lot of the same criticisms that male wrestlers face. It's not crazy to ask them to do better.
My perspective is probably a little different from most b/c I'm a female fan, but *for me* women like the Bellas are the whole reason the division went to embarrassing levels of ass in the first place. Nikki and Botch...I mean Brie, are largely part of an era where WWE didn't give two damns about in ring ability (points at Rosa Mendes) and if you had "the look" not only did they hire you, you flourished. And not like in the past, like say Marlena or In the ring. You had actual in ring success despite being unable to even run the ropes. And not just "get a lot of tv time" type of success. You could be an actual, factual champion with zero skills. I mean...we're talking a time period when Kelly Kelly had a longer title reign than Natalya. Let that sink in.
Nikki and Brie encapsulate everything that went wrong w/the division and led to Divas matches being called "pee breaks". So they can get in their feelings if they want to, but it is what it is. Them being supportive of the movement towards Divas getting a chance doesn't negate the fact that they are the literal faces of what was arguably one of the worst, if not *the worst* period of women's wrestling in the WWE which was the entire reason the Divas weren't getting chances anymore in the first place. Having them feature so prominently and so heavily is counterproductive to everything WWE claims it's trying to do. You don't "evolve" backwards. That's not how it works.
If they wanted to honor the past while keeping the focus on the present and staying on message (never forget WWE has had a heavy hand making the Diva moniker carry a negative connotation) they'd have focused on Mickie. She is not only one of the women from the Divas era who was amazing in the ring back then, but also a current superstar.
@Kidd Dibiase is gonna hate this post..lolSo true. The Bellas are so awful its embarrassing. Always have been. Nikki has improved a ton since she started, but that's like comparing a huge pile of shyt to some turds.
Both smell, both disgusting, one is just a little more tolerable then the other.
Of course they are in their feelings...the two women who kicked things off ate on Raw in a circle jerk tag team gimmick borrowing from the Rock and Sock connection name...lolThis roster stays in their feelings about dumb shyt
My perspective is probably a little different from most b/c I'm a female fan, but *for me* women like the Bellas are the whole reason the division went to embarrassing levels of ass in the first place. Nikki and Botch...I mean Brie, are largely part of an era where WWE didn't give two damns about in ring ability (points at Rosa Mendes) and if you had "the look" not only did they hire you, you flourished. And not like in the past, like say Marlena where character work was the strength and they played to that. Nah, these women flourished In the ring. You had actual in ring success despite being unable to even run the ropes. And not just "get a lot of tv time" type of success. You could be an actual, factual champion with zero skills. I mean...we're talking a time period when Kelly Kelly had a longer title reign than Natalya. Let that sink in.
Nikki and Brie encapsulate everything that went wrong w/the division and led to Divas matches being called "pee breaks". So they can get in their feelings if they want to, but it is what it is. Them being supportive of the movement towards Divas getting a chance doesn't negate the fact that they are the literal faces of what was arguably one of the worst, if not *the worst* period of women's wrestling in the WWE which was the entire reason the Divas weren't getting chances anymore in the first place. Having them feature so prominently and so heavily is counterproductive to everything WWE claims it's trying to do. You don't "evolve" backwards. That's not how it works.
If they wanted to honor the past while keeping the focus on the present and staying on message (never forget WWE has had a heavy hand making the Diva moniker carry a negative connotation) they'd have focused on Mickie. She is not only one of the women from the Divas era who was amazing in the ring back then, but also a *current* superstar. They should have built her into a feud with someone who is the future of the division, like Ember, and let it come to a head at the PPV. An Ember/Mickie match would have given them the chance to tell a story showing where they'd been, where they are, and most importantly, where they're going.