No thread on the outing of our alien brehs?

[jaydawg08]

That doesn't prove there IS evidence to hide.

Believe what you want, though.​

No one knows what he even presented to Congress and the IC IG cause we don't have access to it.. Like I stated before, There's nothing wrong with Congress taking it seriously and going to investigate his, and others, claims on this issue.

I think you're just running around in circles now trying to make an argument that I'm not even talking about

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

No one knows what he even presented to Congress and the IC IG cause we don't have access to it.. Like I stated before, There's nothing wrong with Congress taking it seriously and going to investigate his, and others, claims on this issue.

I think you're just running around in circles now trying to make an argument that I'm not even talking about

My argument is simple: There is no evidence of aliens.

That's it. No need for 'running in circles'.​

 

[jaydawg08]

My argument is simple: There is no evidence of aliens.

That's it. No need for 'running in circles'.​

No evidence made public to us yet... it's why Congress needs to investigate his claims.

 

[klutch2381]

Religious dudes in here terrified.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

No evidence made public to us yet...

Or, no evidence exists.​

 

[jaydawg08]

Or, no evidence exists.​

Which we need Congress to validate/reject his claims.. I'm having a hard time understanding why this is so hard for you to grasp?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Which we need Congress to validate/reject his claims.. I'm having a hard time understanding why this is so hard for you to grasp?

It's hard for YOU to grasp I'm not buying it.​

 

[AngryBaby]

None of them have any evidence.

We just have to take their word for it.​

You are aware that there are classified aspects to this, and that they are speaking in regards to what they are allowed to disclose.

You are aware that Grusch and AARO swore under oath and would be subject to criminal offense if one were to be lying?

I dont think you realize hpw ahead of this they are than just "some dude saying some shyt"

Are you implying this shouldnt be investigated given the information from said sources?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

You are aware that there are classified aspects to this, and that they are speaking in regards to what they are allowed to disclose.

I am aware that the Gov't did all this at Roswell when they were testing experimental aircraft so pardon me if I don't think 'aliens' is the explanation.​

 

[AngryBaby]

That doesn't prove there IS evidence to hide.

Believe what you want, though.​

Lol so are you saying this isnt worth investigating? Credible, disginguished, credited sources going through the judicial process of disclosing something under oath, about an issue thats already been objectively declassified that there were objects in controlled flight beyond the understanding of the military?

Thats actually, less rational considering the circumstances.

 

[AngryBaby]

I am aware that the Gov't did all this at Roswell when they were testing experimental aircraft so pardon me if I don't think 'aliens' is the explanation.​

Its already been stated that if this were experiemental craft, it would represent a startling lack of operational security.

A.K.A: no. And the discriptions of the patterns of movement, dont exactly match up to human tech capability as of yet.

But the point made above should give you pause about repeating that assertion that its secret U.S. tech

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Lol so are you saying this isnt worth investigating?

No.​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

But the point made above should give you pause about repeating that assertion that its secret U.S. tech

I never asserted it was U.S. tech........or ANY tech at all. I asserted that 'aliens' isn't the answer.​

 

[AngryBaby]

No.​

Thats not a rational position.

You do understand there is documentation that Grusch has access to that you, personally can not see correct?

It seems you know...very little about what is going on here and you correlate being on the side of "not potentially looking silly" to being "smart"

And why did you deliberately take out the circumstances I described in that post that would merit investigation?

Are you communicating dishonestly? Are we talking or are we doing one of those half ass dumb nikka convos thecoli tends to do? Where its chopped up, and deliberately misleading for optics?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Thats not a rational position.

Sure, it is. Investigate the claims to explain them.​