So were going to talk about game 1 and ignore the next 3? He has tendinitis in his left knee and sprain in high right foot and last game he actually asked his teammates if they wanted him on the court.
He had 21 in game 2, so you must mean the next 2 He's had more good games with those injuries than he's had bad, the issue is the Bulls are good defensively ontop of his nagging injuries.
I didn't say DeAndre is a great rim protector. I said he's better than Noah. The Bulls aren't getting any resistance at the rim on James. The Clips also had to resort to Blake on Timmy at times which didn't work out well but they still managed to win the series. I agree there are matchup problems with Cleveland or Chicago on the wing, but you're ignoring/downplaying the front court match ups which heavily favor LA.
The Gibson / Pau / Noah frontline is better defensively than DeAndre, nevermind the fact they have an elite wing player to keep James in check
Blake on Duncan is not the same as Blake trying to defend a perimeter player that will pull him from the rim and attack the paint all while looking to score or assist the 3. The differences on the wing are bigger than the ones in the paint, I'm not ignoring them or downplaying them, you just refuse to acknowledge that the Bulls/Cavs have major advantages on the wing.
Bucks were also a bottom five offensive, .500 team in the East who got worse defensively when they traded Knight for MCW.
And? The Bucks averaged 89ppg on 42% shooting during that series, what exactly is your point about Knight? They won games vs the Bulls by playing stifling defense on the perimeter (Middleton / Giannis) and having a rim protector (Henson) in the paint, so what's your point?
What are you basing this on? The Spurs defense is/was way better defensively than Chicago and they couldn't do anything with Blake, DeAndre shot 70% in that series and the Bulls don't have a Tim Duncan to make them work on the other end. Statistically on the year Chicago's defense was a shade ahead of the Clips and they played in the weaker conference.
More Pau is just as good on offense if not better than a 39 year old Duncan, so what do you mean they don't have anyone to make the Clippers work. They have guys that can make them work in the paint and on the wing, the Spurs comparison is moot, Parker and Manu are done, that wasn't a case of the defense being too much for them, they both looked the entire season.