They just updated their online infrastructure. Mh rise is the first switch game to make use of itimagine if they had online functionality that was anywhere close to decent
They're still very far behind Microsoft and Sony on that front though
They just updated their online infrastructure. Mh rise is the first switch game to make use of itimagine if they had online functionality that was anywhere close to decent
imagine if they had online functionality that was anywhere close to decent
that makes no fukkin senseHonestly, it probably wouldn’t make a difference.
People don’t buy Nintendo’s for the same reason they buy playstations or Xbox’s
its absurd far behind they are and they don't even have to careThey just updated their online infrastructure. Mh rise is the first switch game to make use of it
They're still very far behind Microsoft and Sony on that front though
that makes no fukkin sense
if nintendo laid out a pokemon framework similar to something even on the level of a diablo 2/battle.net set up, they'd be swimming in even more money. and its not like they don't have active reach on the mobile gaming front. they're successful there but don't recreate that success or even have it effectively link with their primary gaming front
"people don't buy because"
ppl buy shyt they want to buy or have to buy.
its absurd far behind they are and they don't even have to care
spend more to make more now that's a peak gaming journalism takeDo you think they are gonna sell 10 million more copies of pokemon because of a more robust online infrastructure? The game sold almost 22 million copies. Its gonna soon eclipse gold and silver as the 2nd highest selling game in the franchise.
Why do you think nintendo needs to spend MORE money for something with negligible difference in sales?
I mean, unless you’re actively in favor of nintendo going the MTX/GACHA route with their games
spend more to make more now that's a peak gaming journalism take
you realize how many hoops people gotta go through to just add a friend on switch compared to other systems right? how there's no sharing aspects that are comparable to other systems? online lobbies some shyt from the myspace era?
how much money you think goes into the design and upkeep of a PSO2 quality hub zone? you think nintendo can't afford that? you think pokemon fans wouldn't be all over some 2011 shyt like that?
they could make it F2P and do 18 month season passes - 100% fugazi - and legit make more money than they are now with their manufactured scarcity approach
anyone should be able to play pokemon go on their switch where's the animal crossing go counterpart at anyways?
that's fake as fukkIf theres one business practice I can safely praise Nintendo for its their reluctance to go F2P or heavily promote MTX in their mainline games.
"wait wait stop we're making too much money we gonna make it too hot"Nintendo has zero incentive to provide a modern online setup. They gives ZERO fukks
that's fake as fukk
they selling old ass games running on emulators at full price and you concern trolling about micro transanctions
nintendo sold cardboard with Labo at 70 bucks with a straight face and people clapped. they don't worry about MTX shyt because its too small time for them. they get away with bigger hustles with hardware, re-releases, and accessories
"reluctance"
Top grossing Nintendo mobile games lifetime player spend 2020 | Statista
they made a billy runnin mobile pockets
"wait wait stop we're making too much money we gonna make it too hot"
im personally invested? in what? you check the switch threads from release time and im shyttin on it like everyone else. the hardware is dated, they don't even have shyt the vita has, the online is ass like we thought it would be, etc. its got good ass games. and the only thing better than a good game is playing it with more people. instead they running multigenerational rackets on people. and you big upping these sleezebags for not falling on microtransactions? not only is that false because they do - but they're worse because they're scumbags across the board.You want them to invest in something you are personally invested for something that doesn’t necessarily guarantee and increase in sales on their end. Nintendo is in the position they’re in because they’ve bucked the system not by playing into it.
It’s the same argument with this gamepass thing, yall (market gurus) want sony to adopt gamepass when sony is doing fine making money the way they have been. Same with nintendo, you want them to follow an industry standard that the vast majority of their fans are not asking for.
I think at this point Nintendo’s priority is to plant their feet and aim for consistency rather than make more dramatic changes to their current business model
You’re just trying to justify your personal interest with, “it will make more money” when you have no clue whether it will or wont.
im personally invested? in what? you check the switch threads from release time and im shyttin on it like everyone else. the hardware is dated, they don't even have shyt the vita has, the online is ass like we thought it would be, etc. its got good ass games. and the only thing better than a good game is playing it with more people. instead they running multigenerational rackets on people. and you big upping these sleezebags for not falling on microtransactions? not only is that false because they do - but they're worse because they're scumbags across the board.
i don't want to be catered to. i want send a simple fukking friend request without having to decipher the davince code
for someone taking the keys on being the defacto coli/resetera liason, you could at least not besmirch the honor of the title by saying off the wall like adequate online frameworks would be negative value for nintendo
how you go from "working online components" to "but gamepass" is a cry for help too
"consistency"
they been consistently on bullshyt since gamecube not everybody is a cheerleader breh