New York Times: New Harvard study shows police kill white and black suspects at the exact same rates

Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,664
Reppin
NULL
Bruh look at the video again, they blurred out the person to protect their identity for obvious reasons...

Tamir-Rice-2-300x190.png













DISCLAIMER for the slow nikkas...NO Im not saying he should have died NO im not defending the actions of the Cleveland PD....


Yeah the person was scared they walked by with no fukks given, no sign fear. They blurred it out so you can't see he person's nonchalant reaction to this dumb ass shyt.


When the police pulled up he was by himself with his arms at his side.

They reported he had a BB gun he peeled the orange point of off and you posted a picture of a gun that doesn't even have one.

If they believed he had gun they wouldn't even pulled up that close to him like he did.

Tired of using your imagination.

The Shooter at the movie theater literally slaughtered people and wasn't killed or sight or even shot at.

This kid was literally standing there doing nothing when the police alive.

I hope a cop shoots you next.
 

ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ

Doctors without Labcoats
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,180
Reputation
-2,140
Daps
14,762
Reppin
Payments accepted Obamacare,paypal and livestock
Yeah the person was scared they walked by with no fukks given, no sign fear. They blurred it out so you can't see he person's nonchalant reaction to this dumb ass shyt.


When the police pulled up he was by himself with his arms at his side.

They reported he had a BB gun he peeled the orange point of off and you posted a picture of a gun that doesn't even have one.

If they believed he had gun they wouldn't even pulled up that close to him like he did.

Tired of using your imagination.

The Shooter at the movie theater literally slaughtered people and wasn't killed or sight or even shot at.

This kid was literally standing there doing nothing when the police alive.

I hope a cop shoots you next.

:comeon: werent you the same lying idiot who swore he was alone and didnt point that fake gun at anyone.....can you take this seriously..show some respect


And how did you miss my dumb nikka disclaimer...
 

ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ

Doctors without Labcoats
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,180
Reputation
-2,140
Daps
14,762
Reppin
Payments accepted Obamacare,paypal and livestock
The testimony to the grand jury for anyone who cares...about the truth...because this young boys death is a serious issue
http://prosecutor.cuyahogacounty.us/pdf_prosecutor/en-US/Rice Case Report FINAL FINAL 12-28a.pdf

1. Witness #1
Witness #1 stated that on the afternoon of November 22, 2014, he was sitting at the gazebo waiting for a bus when he observed an “older looking” black male who was walking from the Cudell Recreation Center. The male (Tamir) walked on the sidewalk in front of him but closer to the parking lot. Witness #1 stated that the male then started to act “gangster” by pulling a gun in and out of his waistband and observed that specific motion at least 6 or 7 times. Witness #1 further stated that in 2012 he had been a victim of a previous assault and because of the actions by the male (Tamir) he became frightened and he refused to make eye contact with him. Witness #1 recalled that at one point the male pulled the gun out in front of a passerby and pointed the gun directly at the person’s face as she walked by him on the sidewalk. (Surveillance video captures this interaction between Tamir and Witness #6). Witness #1 further stated that when the male walked back toward the recreation center and away from him, he took out his cellular telephone to place a call to a 911 dispatcher. Either during, or just after the 911 call, Witness #1 stated that the male walked back towards him, walked past him on the sidewalk and sat on the swing located in the park. He stated that because he had his “hoodie” up over his head, he was trying to conceal the fact that he was on the telephone from the male. He stated that at one point he was afraid that he may be shot in the back if he had gotten up and walked toward the back of the transit station. Witness #1 stated that he kept peeking at the male on the swings, and when he saw the male had his back to him, he got up from the bench and calmly walked toward the transit station. He stated that he got on the bus and headed downtown. Witness # 1 stated that he did not know what had happened after he placed the 911 call until either later during the evening’s late local news or the next day.

2. Witness #2 Witness #2 lived across the street from the Rice family and during the year that the Rice’s lived there Witness #2 and Tamir became good friends. Sometime before November 22, 2014, Witness #2’s father had bought Witness #2 an air soft replica 1911 colt pistol and sometime later it malfunctioned. Witness #2 took it apart, fixed it, but could not get the orange tip back on the gun. Previous to November 22, 2014, Witness #2 had given the gun to Tamir to play with and Tamir on several occasions kept the replica firearm at his house overnight.
Late in the morning of November 22, 2014. after working out at the gym, Witness #7 observed Tamir playing with a gun “inside and outside the Recreation Center.” Witness #7 stated, “just waving the gun, pulling it out like (he robbin people).” Witness #7 clearly told Tamir to “put the gun up, you can’t be playing with a gun like that this day and age,” which Tamir responded by laughing it off.

:stopitslime: This is thevery OWN testimony of people who were actually there..not the police or prosecution...So im sorry you were lied to by BLM and whoever else

but at this point im done...
 

ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ

Doctors without Labcoats
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,180
Reputation
-2,140
Daps
14,762
Reppin
Payments accepted Obamacare,paypal and livestock
Armed and unarmed are misleading statistics as well. What qualifies as being armed? Simply having a gun in a glove department is considered armed? Sterling and Castile were both, technically, armed. :ohhh:

The statistics should show how many of these armed male/female actually fired at an officer. Don't fall for the smoke and mirrors. It's from Harvard so it must be right and he's black so it's objectivity. :troll:

The definition of armed is a weapon within arms reach.. in a closed glove compartment is NOT armed..technically those two were armed

its a published paper ..its available for anyone to see and challenge if they find an error...follow the link and see if you can debunk it
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,664
Reppin
NULL
:comeon: werent you the same lying idiot who swore he was alone and didnt point that fake gun at anyone.....can you take this seriously..show some respect


And how did you miss my dumb nikka disclaimer...

I said he didn't point a gun at the cops, and wasn't terrorizing anyone. Nobody was afraid of him. If they were afraid they would've been running.

nobody cared. When the police should up he didn't have the gun in his hand and was just standing there.

They killed him instantly. There is no excuse no matter how many times you spin it, yet you are trying your best to make one.

You a sad individual, I hope they get you next and I'll even add money to cops go fundme, you worthless b*stard
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,664
Reppin
NULL
The testimony to the grand jury for anyone who cares...about the truth...because this young boys death is a serious issue
http://prosecutor.cuyahogacounty.us/pdf_prosecutor/en-US/Rice Case Report FINAL FINAL 12-28a.pdf






:stopitslime: This is thevery OWN testimony of people who were actually there..not the police or prosecution...So im sorry you were lied to by BLM and whoever else

but at this point im done...

Witness also said Hughes was the shooter.

It doesn't matter what the witness say

The videos showed the police kill a child standing there doing nothing.

He was pointing anything at them.

All that is irrelevant.

The Movie Theater Shooter killed people and they weren't out to kill him on sight.

I can do this all day, I break trolls like you everyday
 

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
37,630
Reputation
3,454
Daps
103,501
The definition of armed is a weapon within arms reach.. in a closed glove compartment is NOT armed..technically those two were armed

its a published paper ..its available for anyone to see and challenge if they find an error...follow the link and see if you can debunk it
I asked. Just brought a different element to questioning its merits.
 

ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ

Doctors without Labcoats
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,180
Reputation
-2,140
Daps
14,762
Reppin
Payments accepted Obamacare,paypal and livestock
What people, he was playing in the park by himself. The gun had a orange tip on it.

A 12 year old is menacing, did you ever watch the video, or nevermind you're just a troll lets be completely honest.

Also show me a video of what happened in Baton Rouge happening to a white man.

You're a coward troll leave your mother's basement

Where's the gun in the video? I don't see that gun in the picture anywhere in the video.

You said he was terrorizing people, there's nobody around he's just standing there.


You're justifying shooting a child who did absolutely nothing.

You could be indian like that fakkit napolean

that proves nothing, either way you are a piece of shyt or a gutless c00n

nobody in their right mind could justify that shyt and you just uttered that dumb ass shyt out your mouth.

Even the white people in the comments section are disgusted, fukk and your fakkit ass finger

matter of fact PM your address I don't care if I gotta catch a flight I will pistol whip and put that shyt on world star nikka

Yeah the person was scared they walked by with no fukks given, no sign fear. They blurred it out so you can't see he person's nonchalant reaction to this dumb ass shyt.


When the police pulled up he was by himself with his arms at his side.

They reported he had a BB gun he peeled the orange point of off and you posted a picture of a gun that doesn't even have one.

If they believed he had gun they wouldn't even pulled up that close to him like he did.

Tired of using your imagination.

The Shooter at the movie theater literally slaughtered people and wasn't killed or sight or even shot at.

This kid was literally standing there doing nothing when the police alive.

I hope a cop shoots you next.

I said he didn't point a gun at the cops, and wasn't terrorizing anyone. Nobody was afraid of him. If they were afraid they would've been running.

nobody cared. When the police should up he didn't have the gun in his hand and was just standing there.

They killed him instantly. There is no excuse no matter how many times you spin it, yet you are trying your best to make one.

You a sad individual, I hope they get you next and I'll even add money to cops go fundme, you worthless b*stard

Witness also said Hughes was the shooter.

It doesn't matter what the witness say

The videos showed the police kill a child standing there doing nothing.

He was pointing anything at them.


All that is irrelevant.

The Movie Theater Shooter killed people and they weren't out to kill him on sight.

I can do this all day, I break trolls like you everyday




:snoop:
LOOK here you dumb son of a whore......youre an idiot who thinks the death of this boy is some kind of joke you can fish for daps on...

you cant even approach this topic seriously





this is the subconscious c00ning that comes from the low information militancy passed around as being "pro black"these days even on the coli

SHAME ON YOU...being pro black has nothing to do with being an illiterate BUFOON...you are an embarrassment to us all and your WOAT is richly deserved

And the only thing you proved is that your mother should be prosecuted for drinking while she was pregnant.......


:ufdup:DONT BOTHER REPLYING......if you wont be serious about this im just gonna ignore you
 
Last edited:

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,372
Reputation
3,317
Daps
53,717
Reppin
CALI
this is the subconscious c00ning that comes from the low information militancy passed around as being "pro black"these days even on the coli
How are u gonna suggest anyone is a c00n when your trying to argue that black people aren't targeted by cops more than white people, and that it's just a "liberal talking point"
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,664
Reppin
NULL
:snoop:
LOOK here you dumb son of a whore......youre an idiot who thinks the death of this boy is some kind of joke you can fish for daps on...

you cant even approach this topic seriously





this is the subconscious c00ning that comes from the low information militancy passed around as being "pro black"these days even on the coli

SHAME ON YOU...being pro black has nothing to do with being an illiterate BUFOON...you are an embarrassment to us all and your WOAT is richly deserved

And the only thing you proved is that your mother should be prosecuted for drinking while she was pregnant.......


:ufdup:DONT BOTHER REPLYING......if you wont be serious about this im just gonna ignore you

Made you quit just like I thought
 

rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,363
Reputation
1,890
Daps
12,849
Reppin
NULL
slow down. can someone tell me is this a per capita study or a total vs total study?

meaning. if it says there are 100 whites in america, and there are 20 blacks in america. the police shoot 20 blacks in america but they also shoot 20 whites in america. so wa la... its even, no bias. when in reality. its 80 less blacks in america than their are whites. so you just wiped out all of the blacks and only 20% of the whites. pure bias towards blacks is what the per capita shows.

So thats first. i need to know which. someone hook a bruh up with that info before i go in on the study.

Now lets say it is a per capita study which would make more sense to what the article is trying to say.
The problem again lies with per capita of What type of black person vs what type of white person are you stopping?

meaning. if there are 100 whites in america and 20 blacks. and lets say you stop 15 blacks, and you stop 15 whites. you will say look its even.. fairly stopping the same number of people on both sides. incorrect. per capita per the population of each group. you are stopping an insane amt of black people vs white people that live in the US. This also means when the numbers come out. they wont show how many of those 15 blacks stopped should have never been stopped to begin with. vs how many whites were stop that should have or should not have.

let me go deeper.

if say the whites they stop were actual real life hardened criminals with gun charges on their records. not just possession but use of them in the past on other people or at cops, etc. so of course when you stop said white person. you will be quicker to shoot a KNOWN SHOOTER white person. But would you do the same for the non shooter white guy? no. because he was never STOPPED to begin with. so that part of the data isnt even in there.

which is another point with the BLM, and other issues with police. its not JUST about police shootings. thats the tip of the iceberg. its about the unfair treatment.

someone will say bu bu but yall do more crime per capita than whites. and i'll respond 2 ways. DO WE? how do you know this? you will say look at the stats. I will say the stats that were made by white people who have shown you they are racist from multiple locations around the US? we saw ferguson's DOJ report. Do you know how many black people ended up in jail for parking tickets or some bs like that. and actually got a legit record because they tried to force them to pay extra fines and what not. thats not a real criminal. thats a fake criminal that the white society has created.

do you know how often a white kid smoking weed gets stopped vs a black kid smoke the same herb? we know its night and day. how often does that white kid get released by the police to go home? often. in comparison to the blacks that will get tossed in jail and now have a record. even if they dont do jail time. they toss them in there. black people for the most part are broke(thanks white supremacy for hundreds of years). this means we dont have money for real lawyers. this means we're going to take the first plea deal. which starts out like this "IF YOU PLEADE GUILTY TO POSSESSION OF HERB WE WILL GIVE YOU NO TIME BUT YOU WILL HAVE 5 YRS OF PROBATION. SIGN HERE."

anyone in their right mind knowing how corrupt the system is, wont fight that. they want to . but they cant. because they can't afford to fight it. a public defendant has too many cases and is usually ilequipped to get a not guilty verdict. so the guy takes the bad deal. one stop. one time smoking weed when you were 17. got you a real life record. and 5 years probation. if you sneeze, you could violate your probation and go to jail for real. since you have a record odds of you getting a decent job is almost nil at this point.

yall see the setup here? this is the difference that isnt in the stats. this is why the "men lie, women lie, but numbers dont." is not 100% accurate. men lie, women like. but numbers are extracted and narratives are built by men and women. so are you sure the numbers dont lie or do they tell the entire truth????"
 

ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ

Doctors without Labcoats
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,180
Reputation
-2,140
Daps
14,762
Reppin
Payments accepted Obamacare,paypal and livestock
How are u gonna suggest anyone is a c00n when your trying to argue that black people aren't targeted by cops more than white people, and that it's just a "liberal talking point"

:dwillhuh: I said no such thing....everyone here is manufacturing things i never said despite them being laid out clearly

this is the thesis in the OP
A new study confirms that black men and women are treated differently in the hands of law enforcement. They are more likely to be touched, handcuffed, pushed to the ground or pepper-sprayed by a police officer, even after accounting for how, where and when they encounter the police.

But when it comes to the most lethal form of force — police shootings — the study finds no racial bias.
And this is my own analysis


There are more police interactions per person in poorer mostly Black neighbourhoods than in suburbs or rural areas for many reasons
-Higher crime rates
-The war on drugs
-Broken windows policing

So if a black person is 3-5 times more likely to actually encounter a cop than a white person then the stuff you copied and pasted is meaningless.....right?
:sas2: Aaanyway now that were done with the death threats and c00n accusations and my taste in adult 18+ entertainment

back to the matter at hand..the statistics in the study can easily be tested ...using data from the guardian and the DoJ
The Counted: people killed by police in the United States – interactive

TOTAL ARRESTS ..........................................................................8,730,665 WHITE 6,056,687 BLACK 2,427,683

TOTAL POLICE FATALITIES...................................................................... II46 WHITE 581 BLACK 306

TOTAL UNARMED FATALITIES................... ................................................229 WHITE 103 BLACK 79

TOTAL UNARMED GUNSHOT FATALITIES..................................................111 WHITE 47 BLACK 40

That last statistic (Black 40) is disturbing because it is higher than the trending 2:1 ratio the data had shown so far.. i suspect the factors for that include mental illness,poor police training and yes some racism undoubtedly

It seems the police are less likely to take chances around Black offenders in some cases

but out of 2.5 MILLION.......2,427,693 interactions 40 unfortunate shootings or 79 tragic deaths is a low number....That accusation of "genocide" just doesn't hold up

So where did you get that idea?
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
That VOX piece you posted failed on the very first assumption
police_shooting_by_race.0.png


You see it assumes because Black people are 13% of the population they encounter the police 13% of the time..which is easily demonstrated to be false
you can see this in arrests
TOTAL 8,730,665 WHITE=6,056,687 BLACK= 2,427,683 Table 43

so if you factor in that significantly higher number of contacts the study in the OP is actually proven right.
This.
The "study" is such bull shyt i'd expect more from a harvard study. The data set is low as all fuk, it's conclusions disregard population density. It's almost as if the shyt was done on purpose.
 
Top