Netflix might have one: Making a Murderer (Dec 18th)

PortCityProphet

Follow me to the truth
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
80,690
Reputation
17,418
Daps
274,745
Reppin
Bama ass DC
Brendan got fukked harder than anybody :damn:
Dude got set up by everybody. Just threw his slow ass to the wolves :mjcry:
Feel bad for dude. Like how they find dude guilty of sexual assault? Wasn't a body to prove that. Charge should have been thrown out :camby: how can you believe his story when non of the evidence matched his story. Talking about slitting her throat yet there was 0 blood. Were the ropes and chains ever presented in court? Brendan was fukked dearly
 

jadillac

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
54,531
Reputation
8,601
Daps
166,919
And remember who spotted those car keys? LENK. pretty fishy.

i mean who's DUMB enough to leave car keys in the middle of the floor & a car on the property with blood in it, but smart enough to clean up what would had to have been speckles of blood from a gun shot to the head?

That just don't make sense.
 

PortCityProphet

Follow me to the truth
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
80,690
Reputation
17,418
Daps
274,745
Reppin
Bama ass DC
i think avery killed the girl

the car, the bon fire

i think the cops knew he did it as well but didnt think they had enough evidence and planted the key

what really bothers me is that her blood was in the back of the rav4 so she was put in her own rav4 but why would you put her body in the vehicle if your going to burn her 20 feet from your place? why were her bones in the barrel, i dont think the pit was the original burn scene

the cop who was on the stand testifying about the license plate, i have the feeling he was looking at the vehicle before it was discovered

the mentally slow kid, i am absolutely convinced he had nothing to do with it, the cops fuked him over, the original lawyer fuked him over, his mom fuked him over by not being there why they interrogated him

i feel sorry for him


I too think Steve did it. For 2 reasons and 2 reasons only
1. How'd the bones end up in the fire pit when he had the fire that night? Idk of that could have been planted. But that's really the only evidence I question
2. He just wasn't as addiment about his innocence the 2nd time as he was the 1st conviction. It might have been due to editing and what they decided to put in the doc but he just didn't seem to be as aggressive this time.
But he should still be free cause the job his lawyers did was amazing.
 

jadillac

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
54,531
Reputation
8,601
Daps
166,919
I do find it weird tho that he did have a bonfire the day she went missing and she turns up burnt to ashes.

that's not uncommon in the rural areas. People burn their trash regularly.

Plus the phone calls Avery made to his girlfriend during the time he was supposed to be killing her.

I don't think he did it, but I think he and his family probably did a ton of petty stuff to get on the bad side of the town police. Dude had a good chance to win millions of dollars, I don't think he would've killed ol girl.

He just doesn't seem smart enough. And there's just so much lack of evidence.
 

jadillac

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
54,531
Reputation
8,601
Daps
166,919
I don't want to ever have to deal with crooked ass detectives/lawyers/judges :sadcam:
Stay outta the courts breh. It's no place for a Black person.

I made a thread about it on here a while back.....a lot of young minoritiy(black & mexican) kids have this mindset of "I'll beat a charge", "I'll fight that charge and beat it"

Most of the time, no you won't. :ufdup:


And these judges and DA/prosecutors don't give a flying flip about you. They will give you 25 years for something, then go out and have dinner/drinks with YOUR attorney :heh:

Your life is over and they're simply using you as practice/discussion. It's all a game to most of them.
 

dtownreppin214

l'immortale
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
55,693
Reputation
10,536
Daps
191,946
Reppin
Shags & Leathers
i mean who's DUMB enough to leave car keys in the middle of the floor & a car on the property with blood in it, but smart enough to clean up what would had to have been speckles of blood from a gun shot to the head?

That just don't make sense.
Breh he killed her AND the police planted evidence out of fear of him getting off.
 

aceboon

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
34,948
Reputation
3,909
Daps
116,539
Reppin
NULL
clink the link and watch the vid if you don't want to read

'Making A Murderer' Creators: We Were Contacted by Juror

The creators of the popular Netflix documentary series "Making a Murderer" said that a juror from Steven Avery's trial reached out to them with an important revelation.

The two filmmakers, Laura Ricciardi and Moira Demos, said on NBC's "Today" Tuesday that the juror believes Avery, who was convicted of murdering a 25-year-old woman in 2005, was not proven guilty in his trial. The juror, who voted to convict Avery, only did so out of fear for his/her personal safety, Demos said.
"(The juror believed) Steven was framed by law enforcement and that he deserves a new trial, and if he receives a new trial, in their opinion it should take place far away from Wisconsin," Ricciardi said.

"Making a Murderer" depicts the story of Steven Avery, a Wisconsin man who was imprisoned for 18 years and later exonerated for sexual assault. Avery went on to sue Manitowoc County, Wisconsin, officials for $36 million. Soon after county officials were deposed in that lawsuit, Avery was accused of murder in the killing of Teresa Halbach, a 25-year-old photographer.
Avery ultimately was convicted of murder and of illegally possessing a firearm, but was found not guilty of mutilating a corpse.

The series was filmed over 10 years by Ricciardi and Demos, two Columbia film school graduates, and has garnered powerful reactions from viewers.


The juror who contacted the documentary's filmmakers also said that the verdict reached in Avery's trial was a "compromise."


"The juror contacted us directly ... and went on to describe the jurors ultimately trading votes in the jury room and explicitly discussing, 'If you vote guilty on this count, I will vote not guilty on this count,'" Ricciardi said.
The juror told the filmmakers that they hoped a split verdict would send a message to the appellate courts to give Avery a new trial.

"That was sort of their plan but obviously it didn’t work out that way," Ricciardi said.
“This juror said that they have been open about what they told us and that if someone were to ask they would admit to being a source,” Ricciardi said.

The two filmmakers have not yet contacted other jurors to independently verify this revelation, they said. NBC News has not independently verified this claim with any jurors.
A Change.org petition requesting pardons for Avery and his nephew Brendan Dassey, who was also convicted in Halbach's murder, has over 200,000 signatures. A petition on Whitehouse.gov received more than 58,000. Should the White House petition receive 100,000 signatures by January 16, the White House has to respond publicly.

The prosecutor in Avery's case, Ken Kratz, has said that the documentary left out important evidence, and told The New York Times that the filmmakers had an "agenda" to stoke public outrage.
Demos and Ricciardi have denied the accusation and told "Today" they were pleased with the reaction to their show.

“We made this series to start a dialogue and the fact that so many people are talking is just thrilling,” Demos said. She hopes the dialogue will encourage those with information to come forward.



Source: 'Making A Murderer' Creators: We Were Contacted by Juror
Follow us: @nbcchicago on Twitter | nbcchicago on Facebook
 

Arithmetic

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Mar 6, 2015
Messages
49,590
Reputation
14,552
Daps
263,020
'Making A Murderer' Creators: We Were Contacted by Juror

The creators of the popular Netflix documentary series "Making a Murderer" said that a juror from Steven Avery's trial reached out to them with an important revelation.

The two filmmakers, Laura Ricciardi and Moira Demos, said on NBC's "Today" Tuesday that the juror believes Avery, who was convicted of murdering a 25-year-old woman in 2005, was not proven guilty in his trial. The juror, who voted to convict Avery, only did so out of fear for his/her personal safety, Demos said.
"(The juror believed) Steven was framed by law enforcement and that he deserves a new trial, and if he receives a new trial, in their opinion it should take place far away from Wisconsin," Ricciardi said.

"Making a Murderer" depicts the story of Steven Avery, a Wisconsin man who was imprisoned for 18 years and later exonerated for sexual assault. Avery went on to sue Manitowoc County, Wisconsin, officials for $36 million. Soon after county officials were deposed in that lawsuit, Avery was accused of murder in the killing of Teresa Halbach, a 25-year-old photographer.
Avery ultimately was convicted of murder and of illegally possessing a firearm, but was found not guilty of mutilating a corpse.

The series was filmed over 10 years by Ricciardi and Demos, two Columbia film school graduates, and has garnered powerful reactions from viewers.


The juror who contacted the documentary's filmmakers also said that the verdict reached in Avery's trial was a "compromise."


"The juror contacted us directly ... and went on to describe the jurors ultimately trading votes in the jury room and explicitly discussing, 'If you vote guilty on this count, I will vote not guilty on this count,'" Ricciardi said.
The juror told the filmmakers that they hoped a split verdict would send a message to the appellate courts to give Avery a new trial.

"That was sort of their plan but obviously it didn’t work out that way," Ricciardi said.
“This juror said that they have been open about what they told us and that if someone were to ask they would admit to being a source,” Ricciardi said.

The two filmmakers have not yet contacted other jurors to independently verify this revelation, they said. NBC News has not independently verified this claim with any jurors.
A Change.org petition requesting pardons for Avery and his nephew Brendan Dassey, who was also convicted in Halbach's murder, has over 200,000 signatures. A petition on Whitehouse.gov received more than 58,000. Should the White House petition receive 100,000 signatures by January 16, the White House has to respond publicly.

The prosecutor in Avery's case, Ken Kratz, has said that the documentary left out important evidence, and told The New York Times that the filmmakers had an "agenda" to stoke public outrage.
Demos and Ricciardi have denied the accusation and told "Today" they were pleased with the reaction to their show.

“We made this series to start a dialogue and the fact that so many people are talking is just thrilling,” Demos said. She hopes the dialogue will encourage those with information to come forward.



Source: 'Making A Murderer' Creators: We Were Contacted by Juror
Follow us: @nbcchicago on Twitter | nbcchicago on Facebook

The people of the United States about bring light to the truth. :wow:
 
Top