Man, TH has not empirically proven a single one of his ideas/theories. It’s just talk with a lot of scientific buzz words and hodge-podge ideas. Additionally, It’s up to TH to actually PROVE the things he’s saying. “I created a new method of flight.” Okay, where is it? That’s something that should be easily generalizable and reproducible. Yet, we don’t have a scintilla of proof. There’s an old adage, “great claims require great proof.” It’s also difficult to disprove something that hasn’t been proven. Richard Dawkins has the famous example about how do you know there isn’t a spaghetti monster in the woods? Can you disprove there isn’t?
There have been plenty other videos that have systemically broken down how TH is wrong. I didn’t get the feeling NDT was going to go through all 36 pages of feedback. I’m pretty sure he had critical feedback for all of TH’s positions.
On another note, TH would never make it as an academic. That feedback from NDT was light. The academy is a humiliation ritual for EVERYONE. No one is going to hold your hand and tell you patently false things are true. There’s not a single manuscript you can submit, no matter who you are, where everyone will be like, “Oh my god, this is perfect.” There will always be criticisms, limitations, in even great works. And TH has not produced one single peer reviewed work.
If he had legitimately gone through the steps of really studying the things he’s attempting to build upon via graduate school and such, he would see that NDT wasn’t even being mean to him. THIS IS THE PROCESS FOR EVERYONE. He would also understand that he’s not being invited to speak at Oxford because they find him brilliant, but because he has a name and they’re essentially using him as an academic court jester.
TH is indicative of the epoch we are in where people espouse views on things they have a cursory understanding of at best, but speak about it with irrational confidence and conviction. It’s evident in pretty much all discourse on any matter now. Dude talking about he was going to destroy the world with his newfound knowledge and shyt . This man clearly has mental health issues, but instead of recognizing that—we have some people talking like TH is some misunderstood genius.
shyt is weird.
There have been plenty other videos that have systemically broken down how TH is wrong. I didn’t get the feeling NDT was going to go through all 36 pages of feedback. I’m pretty sure he had critical feedback for all of TH’s positions.
On another note, TH would never make it as an academic. That feedback from NDT was light. The academy is a humiliation ritual for EVERYONE. No one is going to hold your hand and tell you patently false things are true. There’s not a single manuscript you can submit, no matter who you are, where everyone will be like, “Oh my god, this is perfect.” There will always be criticisms, limitations, in even great works. And TH has not produced one single peer reviewed work.
If he had legitimately gone through the steps of really studying the things he’s attempting to build upon via graduate school and such, he would see that NDT wasn’t even being mean to him. THIS IS THE PROCESS FOR EVERYONE. He would also understand that he’s not being invited to speak at Oxford because they find him brilliant, but because he has a name and they’re essentially using him as an academic court jester.
TH is indicative of the epoch we are in where people espouse views on things they have a cursory understanding of at best, but speak about it with irrational confidence and conviction. It’s evident in pretty much all discourse on any matter now. Dude talking about he was going to destroy the world with his newfound knowledge and shyt . This man clearly has mental health issues, but instead of recognizing that—we have some people talking like TH is some misunderstood genius.
shyt is weird.
Last edited: