David_TheMan
Banned
Typically people hold the presumption of innocence against charges, until proof is offered, that is why I typically don't hold any allegation as fact until proof is brought.Why you not checking all the people who are assuming he is innocent though,as fact? As we have seen men in position of power are often getting the benefit of the doubt,because people assume they don't have to rape anybody.
All i'll say is he always gave me that vibe he was a arrogant piece of shyt who can't stand to be wrong. Maybe she told him he was wrong for thinking he could get the p*ssy,and he just had to prove she was wrong for thinking otherwise?
without proof though,he gets the benefit of the doubt,but not a passionate benefit of the doubt. Or a condemnation of her because she may be telling the truth. All we can do is support the women who haven't become victims yet,to let them know they can feel safe and supported when they come out with allegation. But they need to do it in a timely matter,fukk all excuses. And yes there are excuses that may make a woman not want to come foward,but it has to be made known we can't hold anybody to the fire over allegations from 20 years ago. Or even recent claims not taken to police.
Problem is people aren't supportive when women come out quickly either when they are a admirerer of the accused. Outsiders should fall back,keep opinions to themselves without condeming either,and let the investigation and mostly the facts show the truth.
She has brought no proof and if you go to the website and read the shyt that woman wrote, you wouldn't even think she is a credible complainer.
