I'm trying to be objective...
Are we saying the Spurs tanked because it's just something popular to say or is it something you can actually point to?
That same year that they went 20-62, the summer before the season they signed
Dominique Willing to try to catch light in a bottle...he avg 18 ppg.
They also went 3-15
and instead of continuing with the coach that had success before, theg subsequently fired the head coach because of the performance and hired Popovich that same year. That doesn't sound like a ploy to tank, it sounds like they were completely appalled by the coach's performance.
Not only that, apparently
Robinson suited up mid way into the season and played 6 games before breaking his foot in the season and had to get a screw in his foot. Source:
Spurs' Robinson Breaks His Foot
Sean Elliot, Wilkins, Avery Johnson and Del Negro all played at least 30 minutes that season. Source:
1996-97 San Antonio Spurs Roster and Stats | Basketball-Reference.com
When comparing the 2017 Knicks record and the 97 Spurs record:
In their last 20 games of these comparative seasons, the Knicks won 6 games and the Spurs won 6 games.
One teams fans chews out everyone from coli brehs to management and the other team is praised as a champion of tanking in a draft class with Duncan, Billups, Tmac and the rest duds where draft position meant even more in that 97 draft than in a 2017 draft that's loaded.
Stop it, Breh.
Spurs were not tanking. And if they were, they were doing a bad job considering the above mentioned facts.