The Stan Titan
Rookie
After watching this it's embarrassing to think NASA had to hoax this thing
. Pathetic from NASA
'Moon rock' given to Holland by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin is fake
- Thread starter CouldntBeMeTho
- Start date
After watching this it's embarrassing to think NASA had to hoax this thing
. Pathetic from NASA
What have I claimed to know in this thread besides that we went to the moon and that there's nothing impossible about that?no you big dummy. I actually believe we did go to the moon. I just hate you hl fakkits that act like you know everything.
Look at you jumping to conclusions about shyt you really dont know
I don't trust "all info 100%." But yes, I do tend to trust that actual events happened when ten of thousands of people independently verifys the actual process of said events and tens of millions more verify their scientific and engineering soundness.
"Believing we really did land on the moon" isn't scientism.
Last edited:
Berniewood Hogan
IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
"There's no evidence." "Okay, here's some evidence.
"Your evidence is fake.""Okay, how do you know that?"
"Because there's no evidence, therefore, any evidence you provide must be fake."".......................Okay, breh."
Poetical Poltergeist
Precise and cold hearted
So did they test all the moon rocks given out?
I don't trust "all info 100%." But yes, I do tend to trust that actual events happened when ten of thousands of people independently verifys the actual process of said events and tens of millions more verify their scientific and engineering soundness.
"Believing we really did land on the moon" isn't scientism.
1. What info don't you trust?
2. There is no tens of thousands of verifications. There are no books, articles or documentaries of those people of that amount claiming such a thing.
3. I bet you believe those 7 astronauts died on 1986 on the challenger.
4. Scientism is a belief system...ill leave it as that.
From scientists?
I don't believe there's any evidence that evolution over any meaningful scale is random or undirected. I don't believe there's any evidence for the many-worlds hypothesis and think thatusing such to explain away fascinating pro-humanity aspects of our universe is a huge cop-out. I believe that many scientists dismiss the supernatural without justification. I think string-theory and brane-theory is a bunch of modeling bullshyt that has zero value in the real world. I think that many ecological, agricultural, medical, and nutrition studies are fundamentally flawed and overstate their conclusions. I think there is systematic bias among scientists for pro-technological solutions and this is especially dangerous when agriculture and environmentalism are in play. I think scientists are overly biased towards testable and provable answers and thus avoid considering answers that may be true but can't be easily tested. I think that many "scientific" conclusions on hot-button moral and political issues are influenced by the value systems of the scientists as much as by the data. I think IQ studies show massive methodological errors, especially when attempting to compare different races to each other. I think IQ in general is a bit bullshyt of a measurement. I think the fact that the "we don't have free will!" experiments were broadcast so much while the "oh, never mind, that was just a methodological error" fix was so quiet was due to value systems. I think Stephen Hawking is an uninformed idiot on most non-physics subjects and should shut up and model equations. I think Carl Sagan could be an a$$hole and should have shut up more often too. I think nuclear weapons, commercial agriculture, and many other technologies were driven overly hard by scientists who didn't realize the consequences of what they were doing or the systems involved. I think that one day CRISPR might go into that same category and is likely to be a huge mistake.
That's off the top of my head but I'm sure there's more.
There are that many people who were directly involved. You want to claim that they think the whole thing was a hoax but only keep that information among family and friends who then proceeded not to tell anyone?
I bet you believe Dylann Roof didn't kill those black folk.
Yes, a belief system held by people who would go apeshyt if they read what I said up there in that top paragraph.
Last edited:
1. Speaking on NASA scientists not other scientists.
2. There is a thing called "Need to Know" and there things held by government that are classified. Jail or losing job are key components of why people keep their mouths shut.
2B. I don't care what NASA people you met or are in touch with...dont make it any less fake. Again throwing your creditals around mean nothing. Blind faith relies on you to believe it when you haven't seen it yourself.
3. Ignore my question with a irrelevant question to this topic. Should I expose NASA lies again.
4. It's not just apeshyt but quick to defend it like their life depended on it.
MischievousMonkey
Gor bu dëgër
@hustlemania @xCivicx @Ill Clinton
Don't you find it odd that these clowns are quick to claim we are being disrespectful to black women bc of the space flight calculations but want you to respect NASA Nazi ties scientists as innovative.
Don't you find it odd that these clowns are quick to claim we are being disrespectful to black women bc of the space flight calculations but want you to respect NASA Nazi ties scientists as innovative.
Berniewood Hogan
IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
Smart dumb nikkas formed up in this thread like Voltron 
You're laughing like thats not a fact smh
Be dumb as fukk brehs
Because although the sun is much, much larger than the moon, it's very very veeeeery far away from the earth.