More of nothing babble about a 18th century picture. lolin the painting Carlos Quinto is dark skinned while the last king on the list (Carlos quarto) is made lighter…
Carlos Quinto magically was a dark skinned king during who ruled over the Iberian peninsula, during the enslavement of Blacks in Spain. Make it make sense. The fact that painting is from centuries later already after Carlos Quinto actually lived, made your claims obsolete. lol
That is what all pseudo scholars, scam gods and frauds say.And I already said I’m not answering your tangents.
Are they or aren't they. According to you he was Black based on an image you have seen on the internet,“ALWAYS KNOWN AS CARLOS QUINTO”
Goyim: Why did Carlos Quintos name change to Charles V?
Also Goyim: Carlos Quinto and Charles V are two different people
But you didn't know nothing about it, as you have admitted. Nor did you know anything about his life. lol
Case in points that Charles V was responsible for the enslavement and deportation of Blacks. As did Carlos Quinto. Perhaps this was coincidence that men have the same history?
I am not saying it, I cited the source. This again tells that you have a low level of comprehension. Bet, Moors weren't just muslims, but that is probably also knew to you. Even converted muslims like the Moriscos were expelled. I also posted those sources. And as the record showed, these Ladinos Africans were practicing Israelites. So that's three uppercuts in a row.And you keep saying they expelled MOORS when they actually expelled practicing Israelites.
Martyrdom of Saint Maurice and the Theban Legion
Germany (c. 1500)
Oil on Wood, 66 cm.
Brühl, Katholische Pfarrkirche St. Margaretha.
The Image of the Black in Western Art Research Project and Photo Archive, W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research, Harvard University
As usually you have nothing relevant to contribute, so what you had to do post nonsense as you have being doing all over this thread. You can't dress the issues at hand. So you go into your childish tantrums. Typical.Goyim: it’s not (present tense) in a museum
*posts museum the painting is in*
Goyim: it wasn’t always in a museum now was it?
Again, no source, no date no artist who made this. Typical. lolSame reason Mexicans will have artifacts that look like modern Mexicans but pretend as if there weren’t black people in Mexico before the slave trade
You see what is considered dark skin, and in your mind these are Black people? As if there are no other people in the globe with dark skin. lol smh
Let's just ignore these Amerindian people right? And do to them what others have tried to do to use as a people and African history.
“All Native American mtDNA can be traced back to five Haplogroups called A, B, C, D, and X. More specifically, Native American mtDNA belongs to sub-haplogroups that are unique to the Americas and not found in Asia or Europe: A2, B2, C1, D1, and X2a (with minor groups C4c, D2, D3, and D4h3)”
The Six Founding Native American Mothers - The Genetic Genealogist
If you’re interested in DNA, Native American History, or genetic genealogy, then you’re undoubtedly heard of a new paper from PLoS ONE called “The Phylogeny of the Four Pan-American mtDNA Haplogroups: Implications for Evolutionary and Disease Studies.” The authors, from… Continue reading →
thegeneticgenealogist.com
“Q-M3 and Q-Z780 are the two main Y-chromosome founding lineages of Native Americans.”
Analysis of the human Y-chromosome haplogroup Q characterizes ancient population movements in Eurasia and the Americas - BMC Biology
Background Recent genome studies of modern and ancient samples have proposed that Native Americans derive from a subset of the Eurasian gene pool carried to America by an ancestral Beringian population, from which two well-differentiated components originated and subsequently mixed in different...
bmcbiol.biomedcentral.com
Science Vol. 362, No. 6419 - Early human dispersals within the Americas
I stated that this was attempted, but there is substantial evidence that is was a Black civilization that started in Africa, based on population genetics, physical and cultural anthropology. When we speak of so called any other you need to have substantial evidence. Showing a few pictures is not substantial evidence. That is not howe it works. You can't just say whatever and expect people are supposed to believe whatever you say. That is laughable at best. This shows that you have no proper education. What you apparently don't understand about science is that it is verifiably. The issue is that most people don't know how to put ancient Egypt in it's proper context as a Nile Valley civilization, with origin in the Sahel - Sahara.You’ve already stated that Egypt was whitewashed. If they were willing to whitewash Egypt then they’re definitely willing to whitewash other civilizations
“Generally narrower body breaths of the foragers contrast markedy with the wider-bodied agriculturalists. Although bi-iliac breadth has been argued to be stable over long periods of time (Auerbach, 2007), this shift in mean body breath may be indicative of changes correlated with subsistence economy.”
(Pinhasi & Stock. 2011 Human Bioarchaeology of the Transition to Agriculture)
'Tropically adapted groups also have relatively longer distal limb elements (tibia and radius, as compared to femur and humerus) than groups in colder climates."
(Matt Cartmill, Fred H. Smith - 2011)
"What we can say, however, is that in the Holocene, humans from southwest Asia do not exhibit tropically adapted body shape (Crognier 1981; Eveleth and Tanner 1976; Schreider 1975)...."
(Trenton Holliday)
"In fact, in terms of body shape, the European and the Inuit samples tend to be cold-adapted and tend to be separated in multivariate space from the more tropically adapted Africans, especially those groups from south of the Sahara."
(Holliday TW, Hilton CE., Body proportions of circumpolar peoples as evidenced from skeletal data: Ipiutak and Tigara (Point Hope) versus Kodiak Island Inuit)
“Migration within a larger time framework took place ca. 15,000–18,000 BP, when the first Asian populations crossed the Bering Strait, ultimately founding the modern Amerindian population. Despite having as much as 18,000 years of selection in environments as diverse as those found in the Old World, body mass and proportion clines in the Americas are less steep than those in the Old World (Newman, 1953; Roberts, 1978). In fact, as Hulse (1960) pointed out, Amerindians, even in the tropics, tend to possess some ‘‘arctic’’ adaptations. Thus he concluded that it must take more than 15,000 years for modern humans to fully adapt to a new environment (see also Trinkaus, 1992). This suggests that body proportions tend not to be very plastic under natural conditions, and that selective rates on body shape are such that evolution in these features is long-term."
(Holliday T. (1997). Body proportions in Late Pleistocene Europe and modern human origins. Jrnl Hum Evo. 32:423-447)
Last edited: