because the point of dating a rock to something in the past is based on assumption of the quantity of radioactive material in the rock
just because rubidium is naturally occurring doesnt imply when and where it formed. But if you use extrapolations it could be very old based on the dating methods
but as I said before its just a currently accepted theory, not a pure fact.
The problem is you only seem to consider it "tech" if it runs on electricity. A Roman citizen viewed other people in their own time as primitive/barbarians because they had the best tech. There was nothing the Chinese believed they needed to trade for because they believed they had the best tech. But all those things were slow progression, the explosion came when knowledge could be easily shared.Yea I know you believe the ancients were just chucking spears at each other and dancing around a fire till rain came. I get it. It still doesn’t answer how for 299,600 years there was absolutely no tech then in the last 400 we have this technological boom that puts iPhones in our hands and let’s travel at a hundred miles per hr. That’s not how progress works. Either something happened in the last 400 years to cause this boom in intelligence and technology or they’re lying about the past. And going by the structures they built (castles, cathedrals, Great Wall of china, pyramids etc…) it’s the latter
I agree with you in the sense of “who knows” how long it’s been. But I was questioning more so the logic of humans being around for hundreds of thousands of years and seeing no technology until the last 400 years.
When the first settlers arrived in America in the 1800/ they arrived using horse and buggy. 100 years later they have cars. 100 years later they have lamb is. Is that a logical progression of hundreds of thousands of years of walking on foot/animal to within 200 years having a car that can get you 100 miles away ina hr?
And I bring this up to show how people will question the logic of the Bible but not the logic of their own beliefs
This conspiracy theory is the most hilarious shyt I’ve seen in monthsDude said the only tools they had in the 1800s was a hammer and horses
What caused that boom is that the world became relatively small due to people navigating the globe. And scientific disciplines became better understood, with different fields worked together. There was a run up of thousands of years with independent developments.I understand that ancient societies were more complex than the avg person understands. What I’m saying is that you don’t go from no phone for 100s of thousands of years and no cars for the same amount of time to iPhones and Lambos within the last 200 years. Something caused that boom (that coincidentally happened after they touched down in America) that is not being told.
Just to build an rectangular Amazon warehouse on flat land takes a lot of manpower and machinery. Yet somehow with horse and carriage and the tools of hammer and chisel they could build this?
I could keep going to. And it ain’t like they slapped something together and hoped it worked. The structures are still strongly standing until this day. That architecture is proof that they had better tech than we are being led to believe. The story you (if not you than they) believe of there being limited tech for hundreds of thousands of years until the last two centuries is illogical yet they/you won’t question that..
I earlier clarified that I meant cars/phones/tablets/tvs etc..
This thread says humans were here for 300,000 years and did not have any of those things. Then when they “find” America, hundred years later the first drafts of these things come out and 100 years later they’ve been “mastered” (using that word loosely)…
That’s not how progress works. Something happened after they “found” America that led to these improvements and the story they/you tell me isn’t logical….
This is a blatant deceitful tactic pedaled by religious nuts. Carbon dating can be used for shyt way older than 100 years. On top of that, Carbon Dating isn't the only way to date shyt.carbon dating was designed for forensics within 100 years but is being used to determine ages of things thousands, to millions, to billions of years old (based on the assumption carbon 14 has a unique source billions of years ago which is also unproven)
while noone was there to verify the claims
furthermore no two dating methods agree with eachother on dates
“It’s not a real city”That's a fair, its not a city why do you keep posting fairs do you know what a fair is? Its not a real city, its a place people go to see exhibitions and replicas
World's fair - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
His Castles Outlive Their Kings: How Cal's Architect Shaped and Scraped the Skyline - Cal Alumni Association
Think of the San Francisco skyline. You’re probably imagining a series of gradual boxes punctuated with a single pointed pyramid. If you’re thinking more expansively, or perhaps you have regular access to a helicopter, you would include the bridges at the bay and the Golden Gate. If you’ve spent...alumni.berkeley.edu
Whoever you say was running Europe and America before cacs and their cousins were is your answer.Oh ok what were the people who were here before who built Roman buildings called? What did they look like? How did they dress and eat? What gods did they pray to? How did they get here? How long were they here for? What happened to them?
Also, you the architectural designers are the ones who planned the buildings and the people they employed just did what they were told to do right?
Jebel Irhoud - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Where was this 'God' for the vast majority of human history?
So what did they eat? How did they dress? Who did they pray to? What was their culture? Where did they go? Simple questions you should be able to answer if you believe some ancient people built the Boston treasury building“It’s not a real city”
I don’t think there’s much else to say if that’s where you’re going with it.
It’s not real though?
Whoever you say was running Europe and America before cacs and their cousins were is your answer.
And no, construction of quality buildings means using skilled labor. A designer is nothing without skilled labor to actually build out his designs. And those people do not look like skilled craftsmen to me
Dude said the only tools they had in the 1800s was a hammer and horses
Ask those same questions concerning who built stone hedge and let me know what you come up with?So what did they eat? How did they dress? Who did they pray to? What was their culture? Where did they go? Simple questions you should be able to answer if you believe some ancient people built the Boston treasury building
Yes, there would be skilled craftsman present but the majority of workers would be rank and file peasants, same as it was throughout history.
This conspiracy theory is the most hilarious shyt I’ve seen in months
“Stairs for giants”
if you understood how it works you would understand its actually the other way aroundThis is a blatant deceitful tactic pedaled by religious nuts. Carbon dating can be used for shyt way older than 100 years. On top of that, Carbon Dating isn't the only way to date shyt.