There isn’t a more forced, stanley contrived argument in the sport.
Shut up, you’re making sense! That’s not what we do up here.I still don't understand why a forward is compared to a guard. Both required to do different things for there team and the era they played. Makes no sense to me.
Post to username ratio out this worldMore like Jordan left some questions blank, but answered all of the hardest questions correctly, and the teacher decided not to penalize him for any of the questions he did get wrong (like how Jordan stans ignore 1995 and excuse everything that happened in Washington and before 91).
Truthfully so does Bron. He constantly has to tell us how great he is on social media. There’s a weird, “hey look at me, I’m the GOAT and belong too”, to Lebron. I guess it trickles down to SOME of his fans.Born stans got "acceptance" issues
That’s crazy.Got a 98% percent by sitting next to the smart kids in class and cheating, and actually made a few A students get B and C's because he was too busy asking them for the answers that they couldn't finish theirs. He also did this in different class with different smart kids. GOAT shyt
Peak shaq >> peak bron
Peak dream >> peak bron
Peak magic >> peak bron
Peak bird >> peak bron
Peak Cap >> peak bron
Low quality poster, low quality metaphor.
Bad metaphor.
If we're gonna use the test metaphor, it would be like if Jordan got a 100% on all the questions he answered, but he left some blank (retirements). He was so good on the ones he answered, though, that got a 99% overall on the test anyway.
Bron, on the other hand, answered every single question well and left none blank, but never reached the peak of Jordan's good answers. He still got a 98% on the test.
Keep in mind I think MJ is #1 overall still. But Bron solidifying himself as the #2 is all but set in stone at this point. Y'all are gonna have to deal with that whether you like it or not
Good to you, most likely because you’re slow.That's a good metaphor. FOH.
Good to you, most likely because you’re slow.
My thing too is that NBA fans ain't never used longevity to determine who's the GOAT. It's always been peak. Otherwise Karl Malone would be in everybody's top 5.
Even in that Spurs series two of those games was super close. If Lebron didn't have such a horrible series it could've been longer. But that was when his jumper was still garbage and he was more one-dimensional on offense.
The SG and SF position have been the most interchangeable positions in the game since the mid 70s. And when talking All-Time/GOATs positions stop mattering.I still don't understand why a forward is compared to a guard. Both required to do different things for there team and the era they played. Makes no sense to me.
I’m sorry being able to be arguably the best player 20 years later in the game is better than any stat
Bron the goat