I would say Microsoft realized they can't play the same game Sony does. That freed them to think outside the box. Gamepass and xCloud were born from that freedom. Business models that somewhat differ from what Sony is doing (xCloud not so much) where they can dominate at.Microsoft = The Long Game
The goal is to blur the lines of PC/Xbox/Mobile to where it becomes a singular platform. The idea of winning the living room has moved on because we as people don't always consume media in our living room. Wherever you have a screen, they want to reach you at. As long as you can provide content when and where people want it, that's all that matters. Microsoft is going to beat Sony to that eventual destination by quite a bit. That is the next frontier of gaming. I don't like the idea of a digital only future but I'm just one man that sees the inevitability of it.
I would say Microsoft realized they can't play the same game Sony does. That freed them to think outside the box. Gamepass and xCloud were born from that freedom. Business models that somewhat differ from what Sony is doing (xCloud not so much) where they can dominate at.
It's clear that Microsoft's goal is to reach a point where they don't have to sell you a proprietary box to sell you software. Sony's goal is still to sell you that proprietary box.
The best innovations from these companies come from the generations they get put on their ass. The modern Sony we enjoy today was really defined on the PS3 when their sales suffered due to their arrogance. Modern Nintendo thinking outside the box was after they were humbled by Sony also for arrogance. Gamepass and xCloud were from the PS4 handing the Xbox One it's ass causing Microsoft to think differently.
Hilarious that both of these companies have run out of ideas and have no video games to launch their consoles with so all they can compete with is playing chicken on the price point.
600System dropping in a months and still no price. Unreal
600
Cost to build is in the 400s
Disagree. The PS1 and PS2 were always hailed as the "best" Sony generation and they weren't put on their ass by anyone so to speak. PS3 only suffered due to price. If PS3 came out cheaper nobody would've said they got humbled by MSFT and had to one up them with the PS4.The best innovations from these companies come from the generations they get put on their ass.
Someone’s been reading Microsoft PR brochuresMicrosoft = The Long Game
The goal is to blur the lines of PC/Xbox/Mobile to where it becomes a singular platform. The idea of winning the living room has moved on because we as people don't always consume media in our living room. Wherever you have a screen, they want to reach you at. As long as you can provide content when and where people want it, that's all that matters. Microsoft is going to beat Sony to that eventual destination by quite a bit. That is the next frontier of gaming. I don't like the idea of a digital only future but I'm just one man that sees the inevitability of it.
All things equal Microsoft will never outsell Sony. They have in fact never outsold them. They have also almost never taken them on at equal footing either.
PS3 comes out with an excessive price a year later and by the end of the generation it still outsold the 360 globally.
Xbox One comes out with an excessive price at the same time and by the end of the generation it was beaten so bad Microsoft decided to hide the sales numbers on their reports but we know the One likely didn't sell more than half what the PS4 did.
The only time Microsoft had any real success against Sony is when they got a product out a year in advance and had a huge price advantage that they maintained most of the generation.
The PlayStation brand is too strong and the market wants to converge to a single brand. The Xbox brand has a limited appeal in both regions globally and the types of games it can attract and sell. That's why Sony can get some 3rd party exclusive games simply for the fact that the Xbox crowd is completely uninterested in them.
Nothing you've said has discretided anything I've said.
I said it will cost 600, what does that have to do with profitabilityHuh. You think they are selling this thing straight out at a profit.
Sony heavily relied on third party games in both the PS1 and PS2 era. They had their own games but it wasn't quite like it is now with the stable of in-house AAA exclusives people boast about from them. In the PS3 era Sony pivoted away from third party exclusives to them making their own big games. I think their development studios gained more freedom and trust to branch out in that generation.Disagree. The PS1 and PS2 were always hailed as the "best" Sony generation and they weren't put on their ass by anyone so to speak. PS3 only suffered due to price. If PS3 came out cheaper nobody would've said they got humbled by MSFT and had to one up them with the PS4.
Series X isn't really innovative itself either as It's just a more powerful version of the Xbox One X architecturally. It's still the same Xbox controller, UI, games etc. from what they showed us.
The only "innovative" player is Nintendo since they always changing their output every generation.
Except I'm not. People are creatures of habit and without a catalyst tend to be brand loyal. Unless the brand holder does something to damage their goodwill for the most part people will remain loyal. In the history of console games there's only been a couple times a company damaged their own goodwill to the point another company could seize on it and take market leadership.Breh you are just parroting everything you’ve heard from every YouTuber who comments on consoles wars. You don’t have the knowledge base to continue this conversation you cant identify intrinsics, purchase parity power, or verticals.
You see this in as black and white as numbers from ad hominem units sold where numbers don’t matter in a race that close.
I’m afraid this is more to due with production issues than playing chicken with retail prices