$20 a month is the price of 3.5 $70 games so if they return that in value to you over a year not a bad deal. For a lot of people CoD guarantees one $70 game's worth of value to they just need 2.5 more.
Microsoft / Activision Deal Leaves Sony Stans in Shambles | M$ Wins Fight Against FTC
- Thread starter Grand Conde
- Start date
I don't.
1. Microsoft doesn't have the market share to harm consumer via price movement. Period.
2. COD is not the 10-foot giant Sony is making it out to be. It's a popular game series, sure. But it's not even the most popular title in it's broad genre of shooters (Fortnite), let alone across the medium.
3. As the Judge argued in her thought exercise, Sony CAN create a market competitor for COD; it's not like COD has anything essential patented or copyrighted. Multiplayer juggernauts come and go in gaming. Street Fighter II, Halo, World of Warcraft, Starcraft, whatever. The market moves on eventually. Sony can still compete against COD absent the title on their platforms.
Y’all forgetting gold is included, plus cloud streaming, discounts, etc.
For the basic subscription it’s only $10 a month. No way you can’t find $10 worth of value a month. Even if they moved basic to like $15-18 it would still be a good deal
At Gamepass ultimates current price? Probably around the price in my post.
29.99 would probably be a nice sweet spot
The Devil's Advocate
Call me Dad
Yea... Cause you don't get their IP... So it forces you to.... I don't know... Make your own fukking games, while the studio still has their IP to... I don't know... Keep making their own fukking games...So...you're saying, instead of buying the studios, poach all of the talent from all the studios?
Then like magic.. You have two studios make multiple games instead of one making the same game that was just made elsewhere
Shocking
The Devil's Advocate
Call me Dad
Amen to this... This is what I was saying before. All games for all systems would be better for all consumers
Why are people acting like exclusives are a Sony thing? This has been the way since Sega and Nintendo were battling
The Devil's Advocate
Call me Dad
Cause MS pretty much stopped making games that people cared about 2 systems ago
You mean they stopped moneyhatting the games people want.
They have maintained their own franchises. It just became bad business to sign the deals they used to sign for exclsuive content
So because it’s “videogames” there should be no oversight
Hold on “based-politics”? Where do y’all be finding this shyt
So because it’s “videogames” there should be no oversight
Hold on “based-politics”? Where do y’all be finding this shyt
Nah, this is a serious question. Because I went to their home page, and THIS is the very next article I see after that one.
Sometimes it’s good to discriminate
Some of these brehs gotta do some real soul searching if bullshyt like this is what they're digging up to defend their preferred video game company on the internet.
Last edited: