Michael Dunn, killer of Jordan Davis trial thread
- Thread starter Dusty Bake Activate
- Start date
-
- Tags
- trayvon martin
white female juror says it was originally 10-2 to convict him for 1st degree and they were deadlocked from the start. she didn't say who the holdouts were, but we already know it was two of the white males on their racist bs. 
then they bullied another juror into switching their vote and it ended at 9-3 vote.
she basically says the holdouts made the case that davis threatened dunn and he was right to shoot in self defense. the only reason why they convicted him of attempted murder on the other 3 boys is because dunn continued to shoot at the car after it pulled away when they were no longer a threat.
she said most the jurors felt dunn was egotistical and mad cause the boys didn't follow his orders. they took issue with dunn calling them thugs according to his fiance, but dunn said on the stand he would never use those words. dunn never made any mention of being threatened or seeing a weapon to his fiance, but later said he did. basically most of the jurors didn't believe his story at all, but of course all it takes are a few racists on the jury to fukk up what should have been an open an shut case.
then they bullied another juror into switching their vote and it ended at 9-3 vote.she basically says the holdouts made the case that davis threatened dunn and he was right to shoot in self defense. the only reason why they convicted him of attempted murder on the other 3 boys is because dunn continued to shoot at the car after it pulled away when they were no longer a threat.
she said most the jurors felt dunn was egotistical and mad cause the boys didn't follow his orders. they took issue with dunn calling them thugs according to his fiance, but dunn said on the stand he would never use those words. dunn never made any mention of being threatened or seeing a weapon to his fiance, but later said he did. basically most of the jurors didn't believe his story at all, but of course all it takes are a few racists on the jury to fukk up what should have been an open an shut case.
@Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
white female juror says it was originally 10-2 to convict him for 1st degree and they were deadlocked from the start. she didn't say who the holdouts were, but we already know it was two of the white males on their racist bs.
she basically says the holdouts made the case that davis threatened dunn and he was right to shoot in self defense. the only reason why they convicted him of attempted murder on the other 3 boys is because dunn continued to shoot at the car after it pulled away when they were no longer a threat.
she said most the jurors felt dunn was egotistical and mad cause the boys didn't follow his orders. they took issue with dunn calling them thugs according to his fiance, but dunn said on the stand he would never use those words. dunn never made any mention of being threatened or seeing a weapon to his fiance, but later said he did. basically most of the jurors didn't believe his story at all, but of course all it takes are a few racists on the jury to fukk up what should have been an open an shut case.
Sounds about exactly how I assumed.
white female juror says it was originally 10-2 to convict him for 1st degree and they were deadlocked from the start. she didn't say who the holdouts were, but we already know it was two of the white males on their racist bs.
she basically says the holdouts made the case that davis threatened dunn and he was right to shoot in self defense. the only reason why they convicted him of attempted murder on the other 3 boys is because dunn continued to shoot at the car after it pulled away when they were no longer a threat.
she said most the jurors felt dunn was egotistical and mad cause the boys didn't follow his orders. they took issue with dunn calling them thugs according to his fiance, but dunn said on the stand he would never use those words. dunn never made any mention of being threatened or seeing a weapon to his fiance, but later said he did. basically most of the jurors didn't believe his story at all, but of course all it takes are a few racists on the jury to fukk up what should have been an open an shut case.
If anything it shows the prosecution did NOT overcharge the case if they had 10 out of 12 saying guilty on first degree murder
Realistically what else could they have went with? Anything less than 1st degree would seem to put some responsibility on the victim creating doubt overall.
white female juror says it was originally 10-2 to convict him for 1st degree and they were deadlocked from the start. she didn't say who the holdouts were, but we already know it was two of the white males on their racist bs.
she basically says the holdouts made the case that davis threatened dunn and he was right to shoot in self defense. the only reason why they convicted him of attempted murder on the other 3 boys is because dunn continued to shoot at the car after it pulled away when they were no longer a threat.
she said most the jurors felt dunn was egotistical and mad cause the boys didn't follow his orders. they took issue with dunn calling them thugs according to his fiance, but dunn said on the stand he would never use those words. dunn never made any mention of being threatened or seeing a weapon to his fiance, but later said he did. basically most of the jurors didn't believe his story at all, but of course all it takes are a few racists on the jury to fukk up what should have been an open an shut case.
Props to this White Woman for speaking up.
I'm just saying I saw a few posters after the trial blaming the prosecution saying they overcharged and thats why they couldnt get a conviction.
Yeah, I didn't mean you were saying that I was asking in general to people suggesting it.
Born2BKing
Veteran
Honestly, there will be alot more killings like this in Florida. You put a majority white jury together and no way they will ever vote unanimously to convict a white person of a killing a black man.
Yapdatfool
Superstar
shyt like this is why the states should have uniform verdicts, sentencing, charges. None of this in one state you need 12-0, in another 8-4 BS. Just make it simple in all state law and not just federal law.
9-3 should be enough in ANY state to get a conviction.
9-3 should be enough in ANY state to get a conviction.
The vile motherfukker's own fiancé shytted on his cover story, but 3 jurors still held out. Jesus fukking Christ, nikkas have no chance in this country.