Still don't understand how this Cac got off on murder. What the fukk is the debate? fukk them secondary charges. Yes, I realize he'll spend the rest of his life in prison but no justice was served.
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. -- After Michael Dunn was found guilty on four of five counts on Saturday night, State Attorney Angela Corey said she intends to retry Dunn on the outstanding first-degree murder charge.
"We don't back off trying to retry," Corey said.
Dunn faced a first-degree murder charge in the shooting death of 17-year-old Jordan Davis, a charge on which the jury deadlocked.
Corey said she relied on eyewitness testimony and physical evidence in an attempt to prove that Davis never got out of the car.Corey said the State did not "over charge" when it charged Dunn with first-degree murder. Corey said Dunn's attorney Cory Strolla had the option to file a motion to dismiss.
"I'm not really sure why any criminal defense attorney would ever complain, and chronically complain, about an overcharge when they have that tool available," Corey said. "If any criminal defense attorney thinks a criminal has been overcharged, they can file a motion to dismiss."
Premeditation doesn't rely on a certain length of time, Corey said.
"Ten times out of ten, when someone fires ten shots into a car full of unarmed teenagers, we will file first-degree murder and attempted first-degree murder charges," she said.
Corey credited Assistant State Attorneys John Guy and Erin Wolfson for their work during the case, including opening and closing arguments.
Wolfson said Dunn faces 30 years for each count and within each of those counts, there is a 20-year mandatory sentence. Corey said she would consult the families of the victims before pursuing a retrial.
Dunn's sentencing on the three counts of attempted second degree murder and one count of shooting or throwing deadly missiles is tentatively set for March 24.
Still don't understand how this Cac got off on murder. What the fukk is the debate? fukk them secondary charges. Yes, I realize he'll spend the rest of his life in prison but no justice was served.
is there any legal expert who can create a logical explanation for why he was honestly defending himself from jordan, but tried to murder 3 people?
i actually considered the same thing, that when he fired at the back of the vehicle, they considered it to be excessive, but then i think of motive.why would a reasonable self defender want to murder the others? as a juror, you have to try to make sense of what he was doing, and the verdict on the 3 attempts seems to imply a narrative of murder, not self defense against davis.There had to be doubts on Jordan not having any weapon. Maybe they felt like it was ok since Jordan was allegedly threatening dunn's life but shooting at people retreating changes it from defending himself to attacking. lol, even when I try to make sense of it it still sounds spectacularly retarded.
i actually considered the same thing, that when he fired at the back of the vehicle, they considered it to be excessive, but then i think of motive.why would a reasonable self defender want to murder the others? as a juror, you have to try to make sense of what he was doing, and the verdict on the 3 attempts seems to imply a narrative of murder, not self defense against davis.
i cant wait until a juror comes forward and explains all the things that were being said in deliberation.
That's the main issue. there is no middle ground in this case. There is no logical reason to shoot into a car full of people unless your trying to kill them ( which is why this was supposed to be a slam dunk first degree murder). Either he shot at Davis and the kids to kill them or you believe Dunn on his word with no evidence to support it.i actually considered the same thing, that when he fired at the back of the vehicle, they considered it to be excessive, but then i think of motive.why would a reasonable self defender want to murder the others? as a juror, you have to try to make sense of what he was doing, and the verdict on the 3 attempts seems to imply a narrative of murder, not self defense against davis.
i cant wait until a juror comes forward and explains all the things that were being said in deliberation.
Exactly.nah fukk that ____ too...
There had to be doubts on Jordan not having any weapon. Maybe they felt like it was ok since Jordan was allegedly threatening dunn's life but shooting at people retreating changes it from defending himself to attacking. lol, even when I try to make sense of it it still sounds spectacularly retarded.
You guys going to tune into Tariq's Ustream show tonight?
SMDH @ nikkas hating on the guy who made Hidden Colors.
You might not like Tariq, but you have to respect his opinion in Hidden Colors and Black issues.
I don't see what Tariq says that rub these nikkas the wrong way.
SMDH @ nikkas hating on the guy who made Hidden Colors.
You might not like Tariq, but you have to respect his opinion in Hidden Colors and Black issues.
I don't see what Tariq says that rub these nikkas the wrong way.