Mark Zuckerberg planning to localize Facebook salaries as WFH increases

Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
43,392
Reputation
2,552
Daps
105,961
Reppin
NULL
does it really matter? How about you argue against my points. I work a job where I telecommute and make the same amount as I did before I moved. Even if I moved to a place where its cheaper I think I should still get the same pay for the same work.

So you mean to tell me, that as an employer, I should exclude potential employees in regions of the country where top tier talent is cultivated, simply because you feel everyone should be paid as if they are living in Jackson, Mississippi?
 

Michael's Black Son

Blanket Jackson
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
52,417
Reputation
15,169
Daps
230,378
Reppin
New York City & Neverland Ranch
As work from home increases, not only will they check your IP, but they will probably have other productivity monitors such as mouse and keyboard input and I wouldn't put it past companies to monitor employees from their laptop cameras.

This WFH is not going to be as good as people think it will be.

Yup

they issue these laptops with all kinds of company spyware on that shyt with remote access software that won’t say shyt when the machine phones home especially if you’re riding on the company VPN.
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
27,730
Reputation
4,661
Daps
103,102
Can’t believe people are agreeing with these greedy ass corporations.

When they agreed to pay JaneDoe $150k it made fiscal sense based on the value that she brought in her position. If her WFH in West Bumblefukk doesn’t reduce the value she brings why justify reducing her salary? Especially since you’re likely saving money by not having her come into the office. I can see instituting this policy for new employees applying to WFH in West Bumblefukk since you’re hiring based on the job market, but for an existing employee it’s a major faux pas imo to reduce their compensation for any reasons other than poor employee performance (they no longer deserve the pay) or poor company performance (can no longer afford to pay)
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
43,392
Reputation
2,552
Daps
105,961
Reppin
NULL
Can’t believe people are agreeing with these greedy ass corporations.

When they agreed to pay JaneDoe $150k it made fiscal sense based on the value that she brought in her position. If her WFH in West Bumblefukk doesn’t reduce the value she brings why justify reducing her salary? Especially since you’re likely saving money by not having her come into the office. I can see instituting this policy for new employees applying to WFH in West Bumblefukk since you’re hiring based on the job market, but for an existing employee it’s a major faux pas imo to reduce their compensation for any reasons other than poor employee performance (they no longer deserve the pay) or poor company performance (can no longer afford to pay)

Riddle me this... What is Jane Doe’s market value if she took a job in Arkansas?
 

phcitywarrior

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
13,261
Reputation
4,550
Daps
32,153
Reppin
Naija / DMV
Can’t believe people are agreeing with these greedy ass corporations.

When they agreed to pay JaneDoe $150k it made fiscal sense based on the value that she brought in her position. If her WFH in West Bumblefukk doesn’t reduce the value she brings why justify reducing her salary? Especially since you’re likely saving money by not having her come into the office. I can see instituting this policy for new employees applying to WFH in West Bumblefukk since you’re hiring based on the job market, but for an existing employee it’s a major faux pas imo to reduce their compensation for any reasons other than poor employee performance (they no longer deserve the pay) or poor company performance (can no longer afford to pay)

You're correct. But implicit in that comp package is paying you a wage that will allow you live a respectable life in the local market of that firm. So that $150K is likely $110K based purely off the work and value brought to the org. The remaining $40K is a COL adjustment depending on where the job is located.

It'd definitely suck to see your wages decrease just because you moved out of SF even though your output is the same.
 

Spatial Paradox

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
2,290
Reputation
1,120
Daps
12,147
Reppin
Brooklyn
Not surprising they'd consider this. The total compensation they offer now is because they compete for talent vs. other companies in the Bay Area. They probably figure the total compensation they can offer to someone working remote just has to be higher than the whatever smaller tech companies are in the city that person lives in.

That said, I'm interested in seeing what the other FAANG companies are going to do in terms of remote work. If Google for example starts allowing for more remote work, but doesn't make the same cost of living adjustments or their cost of living adjustments aren't as drastic, FB could fukk around and end up having some of their employees poached. Though I suspect other major tech companies will make similar CoL adjustments.
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
27,730
Reputation
4,661
Daps
103,102
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
27,730
Reputation
4,661
Daps
103,102
You're correct. But implicit in that comp package is paying you a wage that will allow you live a respectable life in the local market of that firm. So that $150K is likely $110K based purely off the work and value brought to the org. The remaining $40K is a COL adjustment depending on where the job is located.

It'd definitely suck to see your wages decrease just because you moved out of SF even though your output is the same.

Unless it was EXPLICIT in the comp package, I can’t rock with corporations reducing salaries other than for the reasons I stated. :yeshrug:

There are also implicit (even explicit) benefits that the employee got/expected out of taking that job at FB that they’re no longer going to realize by working from home (ranging from free meals to being an environment where they’ll cross paths with other leaders in tech both internal and external to the company)
 

Rell Lauren

Banned
Joined
Nov 30, 2016
Messages
29,001
Reputation
-2,888
Daps
111,796
Reppin
NYC
Unless it was EXPLICIT in the comp package, I can’t rock with corporations reducing salaries other than for the reasons I stated. :yeshrug:

There are also implicit (even explicit) benefits that the employee got/expected out of taking that job at FB that they’re no longer going to realize by working from home (ranging from free meals to being an environment where they’ll cross paths with other leaders in tech both internal and external to the company)

That happens all the time though. If your job relocates you, they adjust your salary for the area's CoL. You might get an increase depending where you move or you get a decrease. Your salary is relative to the market.
 
Top