That US general made superman look like a bytch at the end of the movie. shyt was embarrassing.
What the fukk does this bullshyt have to do with anything
as much as the comic book zealots will hem and haw, THIS.
zod has really only been done halfway well in the books once, ever: geoff + donner's run. otherwise he's been 100% trash.
and to those complaining about the comics... at the end of the day, it's THEIR version of superman. not YOURS. they dont have to adhere to any book you read, and you dont have to watch it.
LuthorWho rebuilds that city though
If they go that route and in part 2I think Synder, Golan & Nolan will use the same template as the Batman trilogy in terms of storyline.
1st film: Origin, foe is 'one of his own', greater good theme, Ra's Al Ghul/Zod
2nd film: Hero is more established, living with consequences if his presence in Gotham/Metropolis, use of most popular villain Joker/Luther, but will be secondary villain alongside maybe Brainaic which would make sense. Lois Lane will play bigger part, maybe some sort of love triangle with Luthor, who knows.
3rd film: Both focuses on their 'death' Bane/Doomsday
Anyone notice:
When Clark discovers the ship there's a pod there with a skeleton in it but there's another one there as well in the background that had alreadly been opened.
read the comic prequel. That's supposed to been SUPERGIRL in that opened pod.
Fine. But can the changes at least make more sense than the original? I feel they just changed some things just to say they did. Zod was a good change... The costume thing not so much.
Doomsday is stupid as shyt. He is tier FOUR to me.
Doomsday is stupid as shyt. He is tier FOUR to me.
I don't understand why people want Luthor back as the central villain. He's had his time to shine. Brainiac and Darkseid haven't. It's time we see villains who haven't been adapted yet. If they introduce Luthor, it should only be a side character/villain.