Look how far Cacs went to claim Kemet

Bawon Samedi

Good bye Coli
Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
42,413
Reputation
18,635
Daps
166,496
Reppin
Good bye Coli(2014-2020)
People keep referencing Horners as if Nilo-Saharan, Niger-Cogo, Levantine and Libyan tribe didn't live there, too.
I don't know about Niger-Congo or Levatines but I know Nilo-Saharans/Nilotic were the earliest people on the Nile Valley and were responsible for early pre-dynastic culture of Egypt. Physical remains show this.
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,439
Daps
246,375
I don't know about Niger-Congo or Levatines but I know Nilo-Saharans/Nilotic were the earliest people on the Nile Valley and were responsible for early pre-dynastic culture of Egypt. Physical remains show this.

Levantines were definitely on the Nile, especially after the Hittites and Hyskos came

And Davidcici11Evolution claims Niger-Congo were there via DNA studies and cultural links/artifacts :yeshrug:
 

Bawon Samedi

Good bye Coli
Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
42,413
Reputation
18,635
Daps
166,496
Reppin
Good bye Coli(2014-2020)
Levantines were definitely on the Nile, especially after the Hittites and Hyskos came
The bolded is really the only time period. Because there is no Egyptologist states any populations from the Levant migrating into the Nile Valley(thats actually what Eurocentric use for the dynastic race theory), because Lower Egypt which is right next door to the Levant was sparsely populated and was mostly swamp during the pre-dynastic period and even early dynastic period. Same thing for the Levant. If anything it was the other way around. Egyptians/Ethiopians populating the Levant.



And Davidcici11Evolution claims Niger-Congo were there via DNA studies and cultural links/artifacts :yeshrug:

Yeah via the green Sahara. Though he mostly holds that Nilo-Saharans were the main ones on the Nile-Valley.
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,439
Daps
246,375
The bolded is really the only time period. Because there is no Egyptologist states any populations from the Levant migrating into the Nile Valley(thats actually what Eurocentric use for the dynastic race theory), because Lower Egypt which is right next door to the Levant was sparsely populated and was mostly swamp during the pre-dynastic period and even early dynastic period. Same thing for the Levant. If anything it was the other way around. Egyptians/Ethiopians populating the Levant.

I'm not saying Levantines were rulers or were anything but a minority but they were there.


Yeah via the green Sahara. Though he mostly holds that Nilo-Saharans were the main ones on the Nile-Valley.

No doubt.
 

Premeditated

MANDE KANG
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,357
Reputation
2,504
Daps
91,839
Reppin
IMMIGRANT TETHERS
I don't know about Niger-Congo or Levatines but I know Nilo-Saharans/Nilotic were the earliest people on the Nile Valley and were responsible for early pre-dynastic culture of Egypt. Physical remains show this.
One thing I always wanted to know is white group do the Badaris fall under? Were they Nilo Saharans/Nilotic or Cushytes?
 

Im Kemet Rocky & I like penis

googling gay porn :ahh:
Joined
Oct 28, 2013
Messages
325
Reputation
-230
Daps
11,005
Reppin
gaygangbangs.com
All 4 of Ham's sons had sons as well that created their nations/tribes over time. Genesis 10 breakdown some of the son's sons. As far some groups....These are just a few examples

Phut - Berber, native Libyans, Fulani.
Canaan - Yoruba, Beni people, Akan, South Africans

The volatility of the Greco-Roman empires were primarily responsible for the migration of the Canaanite and Israelite nations into the land of Ham (cham-erets in the Ancient Hebrew tongue aka Kemet which means Land of Ham. The entire African continent was called the Land of Ham by non-whites until Scipio Africanus defeated Hannibal in the Punic Wars.

The Phoenicians (from Tyre and Sidon) who were Canaanites set up colonies in northern Africa along the Mediterranean because they were actively involved in a lot trading by ships throughout the Mediterranean. It was also during this time that Edomites began to use Phonecian ship fares to travel and settle in Europe, where they lived among the Japhetic people who were the original inhabitants of Europe and were dark-skinned. This migration to Europe started happening under the reign of King Solomon when the Edomites finally broke away from under the control of the Israelites. The Edomite settlers killed off and pushed out the Etruscans who were the original inhabitant of Italy and Javan people who were the original natives of Greece during the start of Alexander the Great and his dad Phillip's reign.

In fact, many of the white Greek gods were actually Canaanite gods that were whitewashed and renamed after they rose as an empire. The Greek alphabet came from the Phoenician alphabet which came from the Paleo-Hebrew alphabet. So even the letters that we are typing on here do not have original origins with so called white people. But some stayed in Ancient Edom (Idumea) until remaining migrated to the Caucaus mountains when the Byzantine empire took over. Those Idumeans eventually started the Khazar Empire from their Caucus mountain headquarters. These people are your so-called Jews today, who are not the real Jews.
nikka shut up..:mjlol:
 

Bawon Samedi

Good bye Coli
Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
42,413
Reputation
18,635
Daps
166,496
Reppin
Good bye Coli(2014-2020)
Like I said before Nilo-Saharan speakers were more widespread in Ancient times. There are still small minority Nilo-Saharan speakers today in certain parts of the Sahara. Even as far away as Mali(Songhai people). The Hausa's who speak an AA language, actually cluster with Nilo-Saharan speakers. Also one must note that there was a a NS influence on Berber language and Ancient Egyptian language.
In addition to the archeological and paleontological evidence, recent linguistic studies indicate the presence of early pastoralists in the Eastern Sahara .Detailed analysis of Nilo-Saharan root words has provided "convincing evidence" that the early cultural history of that language family included a pastoralist and food producing way of life, and that this occurred in what is today the south-western Sahara and Sahel belt.

The Nilo-Saharan family of languages is divided into a complex array of branches and subgroups that reflect an enormous time depth. Just one of the subgroups, Kir is as internally complex as the lndo-European family of languages and is believed to have a comparable age. The Sudanese branch is of special interest here. This is particularly true of the Northern Sudanese subfamily that includes a Saharo-Sahelian subgroup, the early homeland of which is placed in northwest Sudan and northeast Chad. Today, the groups that speak Saharo-Sahelian are dispersed from the Niger river eastward to northwestern Ethiopian highlands.

The Proto-Northern Sudanic language contains root words such as "to drive," "cow, "grain,""ear of grain," and "grindstone." Any of these might apply to food production, but another root word meaning "to milk" is cetainly the most convincing evidence of incipient pastoralism.

There are also root words for "temporary shelter" and "to make a pot." In the succeeding Proto-Saharo-Sahelian language, there are root words for "to cultivate", "to prepare field", to "clear" (of weeds), and "cultivated field." this is the first unambiguous linguistic evidence of cultivation. There are also words for "thombush cattle pen," "fence," "yard," "grannary," as well as "to herd" and "cattle." In the following Proto-Sahelian period, there are root words for "goat," "sheep," "ram," and "lamb," indicating the presence of small livestock.

There are root words for "cow," "bull," "ox," and "young cow" or "heifer" and, indeed, a variety of terms relating to cultivation and permanent houses.

On the basis of known historical changes in some of the language, Ehret estimates that the Proto-Northern Sudanic language family, which includes the first root words indicating cattle pastoralism, should be dated about 10,000 years ago. He also estimates that the Proto-Saharan-Sahelian language family, which has words indicating not only more complex cattle pastroalism, but the first indications of cultivation, occurred around 9,000 years ago. He places the Proto-Sahelian language at about 8,500 years ago.

These age estimates are just that, and should not be used to suggest any other chronology.
Nevertheless, the sequence of cultural changes is remarkably similar to that in the archeology of the Eastern Sahara and, with some minor adjustments for the beginning of cultivation and for' the inclusion of "sheep" and "goat," reasonably closely to the radiocarbon chronology.
- Fred Wendorf & Romuald Schild, 1994.
 

Marvel

Psalm 149:5-9
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
8,804
Reputation
810
Daps
15,167
Reppin
House of Yasharahla
Just because he post from a biblical perspective doesn't mean you should dismiss his theories.
You never know where you can find links that support and better help you understand the information you already have.

Don't mind them. If I came without Bible references, they would be dapping left and right if used my own opinion.

"Kemet...kemet..they were black...look at the noses and lips" dap dap dap :pachaha:

"Ethiopians got admixture and are not really African...they got smaller noses" dap dap dap :pachaha:

Why don't they just run with what the white man says...that Ethiopians and Ancient Egyptians were nothing more than tan Caucasians :mjlol:

1024px-HM-Hsr.jpg


They've been going back and forth about Ancient Egypt...Kemet...Kemet..Kemet brotha :heh: but have yet to come to a conclusion. They go and used the white man's whitewashed lies that they created in both Egyptology and language groups and wonder why they are still running around in circles. May the confusion continue....
 
Last edited:
Top