If he don't then the jury has to rely on this tape, which has some inconsistencies just from the 911 call he made
yea there are some inconsistencies in the 911 tape but is there enough to convict him on 2nd degree murder? thats the question
If he don't then the jury has to rely on this tape, which has some inconsistencies just from the 911 call he made
Also, he states that he pushed Trayvon's body off of him. Which would make sense, but the police found TM's body face down. (If you push someone off of you, they are going to fall on their back and lay that way) Meaning either GZ is lying about the way he shot him, or that he tampered with the body after getting up himself to cover something up.
Trayvon gets shot & says "You got me"
consistent with what? this is the first time we're really hearing 'his story'
yep, he also said that he 'pinned his arms', or something like that. that doesn't make much sense if the person is already lying on their face
No, it's not. Everything we heard this morning is consistent with what he told investigators after the incident.
No, it's not. Everything we heard this morning is consistent with what he told investigators after the incident.
Zimmerman recounts shooting of Trayvon Martin - YouTube
George ZImmerman Recounts Seeing Trayvon Martin for First Time - YouTube
LANK ??? NBC preferably. I can't find the video on their site
Well, by all accounts, it was nearly pitch-black dark outside. My point is that without evidence of any prior inconsistent statement(s) or witnesses to contradict his story, how do you disprove his alibi? The fact that he has been steadfast with his version of what transpired that night, only helps his case, in my opinion.Your missing that no one is saying that his story has changed drastically.
We're saying hat the story doesn't add up. It's possible to tell the same lie over and over again as if it's true and have it never change. But it doesn't match up with factual things that have been corroborated by the circumstances and everyone involved with the case.
Even look up in that first video. Look how far away and how low/small those bushes are. How does anyone jump out of those bushes? It's not possible.
Well, by all accounts, it was nearly pitch-black dark outside. My point is that without evidence of any prior inconsistent statement(s) or witnesses to contradict his story, how do you disprove his alibi? The fact that he has been steadfast with his version of what transpired that night, only helps his case, in my opinion.