@
Kool G Trap I'm surprised that you would dap up something that narrow-minded.
The only thing narrow-minded in the exchange was your parroting of the logically-bankrupt, disingenuous talking point of "not agreeing with the gay lifestyle."
I would expect that you would come across more of those types than I would coming from the South.
So @
Kool G Trap should understand homophobia better because he's from the south. Because there's like...no homophobia in the north. Doesn't matter that he's from St. Louis a fairly diverse metro area... it's just "the south."
What out-of-touch condescending bullshyt.
Such a perspective is very limited, and really is just a didactic over-embellishment of a simple observation.
Translation: "Let me open up my online thesaurus so I can try and sound smart and use flowery rhetoric to disguise the fact that I'm not saying anything and I feel like trying to put down VVD."
Saying "being gay isn't a lifestyle, it's natural sexual orientation" in the context of my post and my interpretation of the previous post is an entirely pointless distinction to make. I thought it was clear from the context of my post, that I mean many people while they believe that gay people should have the rights they're striving for, they do not understand how one can partake in that sort of relationship.
This is one of the disingenuous piles of shyt ever typed here. Nothing was clear from the context of your post other than literally what you said. You spoke of people "not agreeing with the gay lifestyle" is a disingenuous canard for reasons I already explained, oft-used by blatant gay-hating homophobes.
You are basically dissing me for responding honestly to literally what you said and not what you supposedly meant to say, which I'm supposed to I guess telepathically know. Unreal.
The type of person who would vote for same-sex marriage legislation, but you'll never catch visiting a gay bar even with friend and who is sometimes disgusted with two guys kissing each other. Someone recognizing you as a human being entitled to equal rights does not mean they have to like you. His framing of my argument departs from equality to "you should like us" and it's wrong if you don't. That's asking far too much from each individual person. Someone being "uncomfortable" or "disagreeing" with such behavior doesn't make them the scum of the earth or entirely wrong.
Nobody said it does, and your dishonest framing of what I said was completely ass-derived on your part. Other than that I don't disagree with your last sentence, which was entirely different than your initial comment about "not agreeing with the gay lifestyle."
What's pitiful is in that very post you talked about people not being able to articulate themselves properly when you failed to do so yourself.
What's even more pitiful is you could've addressed it directly and avoided any contentiousness if you just responded to me by clarifying what you meant instead of this passive aggressive responding to me in an insulting matter via Kool G Trap as a proxy. But your pomposity, over-inflated ego, and your bizarre vendetta against me along with your general dikkheadedness wouldn't allow you to do so.
I mean you're sitting here dapping up VVD who has constantly used the words fakkit and has previously attested to how homosexual stuff disgusts him, yet he's in here trumpeting for gay rights.
I don't trumpet for gay rights. It's not something I care too much about honestly. I do trumpet for logic, empathy, justice, and equality, and I debate here a lot. The constant stream of hate and bigotry against gay people here is irreconcilable with my principles, so my responses is what it is.
Regarding my use of "fakkit," etc. that you cited, I've never claimed to be totallywithout bias against gays. No one is...G Trap has called people fakkits too...and you, so I'm not sure what you're pointing me out for. But I think we should generally strive toward embracing our better sensibilities.
It's right there in front of your face. People can feel whatever they want as long as it doesn't transform into behavior that limits the rights of others, or it doesn't lead to subconscious biases with greater ramifications (which it often does). That's my 2 cents on this topic, Napolean will go at this for days like it's a J. Cole hate thread, I can't breh
.
We agree.
Do you ever feel silly hating someone who you agree with on more than you disagree with?
Homie, you know what the difference is between me and a lot of people on most subjects....I know the shortcuts people take and I understand entirely where you're coming from, but I will give people the benefit of the doubt before assuming that they are in that box that I suspect they might be. An uncompromising belief in shades of grey and the potential of positive human contradiction I suppose...[/quote
I think you need to check your ego again. You are by no means some kind of superior, adept debater and you often don't see the shortcuts you take yourself.
You have masteted the ability of typing essays that are vacuous and essentially boil down to nothing, and for all your lofty talk about trying bring people together and finding common ground, the only thing you have managed to do is become the most divisive figure in HL.
. I can't help you with that shyt. I believe that homosexuality is caused by an epigenetic error in vitro. You can call it what you like. I just believe they should be able to live how they please when it comes to forming relationships in legal terms.
easy there, Peter Singer.
