Kareem was fighting injustice in college with black athletes, attending summits and conventions as a young'n. He was standing next to those that were blacklisted when that could've ended his career. He had the entire government on his head when he publicly announced being Muslim and changing his name, and lost potential money in the process.I keep seeing this sentiment throughout the thread, can any of you elaborate on what the fukk Kareem actually did besides public statements and the 1968 Olympic boycott that has you defending him so strongly? Please educate me because you have nikkas itt condemning LeBron for picking his battles and not being vocal on every single issue while his foundation has provided countless resources (computer centers, libraries, gyms) and built an entire school for at risk kids that has and will change thousands of lives in his hometown. Real change not activism, articles and symbolic positions. And I'm not being sarcastic, seriously, I'm relatively young so I don't know, what has Kareem done that is on LeBron's level when it comes to material change in peoples lives.
People respect the money more than the actions, and that's not right. They both have their place. Both are great and needed, but Lebron's financial efforts really don't vary from any white billionaire doing the same exact things. I don't see anything wrong with any one aspect, because everyone is not willing to jeopardize their livelihood by jumping off an unpopular cliff. They don't have to, nor are they obligated. But at the same time, some will put their actions forefront, and not care about the money. I think the main problem is that they both shouldn't be seen as being an activist. That's where the real divide lies. One should be called an activist, and the other something like a financier.