Take It In Blood
Banned
u asked how do they know things happenedOh it’s you, you’re back. Plan not to quote me anymore on here.
i gave u an answer (well pointed u in the direction of an in depth answer)
apologies if that offended u
u asked how do they know things happenedOh it’s you, you’re back. Plan not to quote me anymore on here.
My statement wasn’t addressed to you. I don’t talk to you and I don't like you. Refrain from quoting me.u asked how do they know things happened
i gave u an answer (well pointed u in the direction of an in depth answer)
apologies if that offended u
I'm sorry you feel that way, I have no idea why but I'll respect your position and in the future I'll be sure to remember not to quote your post. (unless you quote me then obviously its only fair that I'll be able to respond)My statement wasn’t addressed to you. I don’t talk to you and I don't like you. Refrain from quoting me.
Not that I agree with Cam... but then wouldn’t there be be displays of weapons and tools that native Americans made out of dinosaur bones? There are displays for less.Right.. They coulda made strong ass weapons wit dem bones.. Imagine tryna save em for studies and future displays
I AM saying the boldso you are saying that there are
ZERO
actual dinosaur bones?
If that's not what you're saying then the fact that every museum doesnt have the real bones is meaningless
Your local science center prolly has a replica of a large alligator or some other exotic creature like a lion. That doesn't mean there are no real lions
Anyway. Go talk to a brick wall for a while cause I know you're just being contrary
Can you post a real life photo of this crater?It has a name, location and estimated time of occurrence.
Chicxulub crater - Wikipedia
I’m unsure what constitutes “evidence” or proof to most of you-what do you think about fossils?
HmmmSmart man to question what we're told to blindly believe
Also fyi, every "dinosaur bone" on display in a museum is a "replica"
Call up any museum and ask them
I made no such claim, I simply said that people need to stop acting as if science is incapable of propagating lies. An individual can be completely ethical within the application of science but their personal agenda has them apply the science in a flawed manner. For instance, I can conduct DNA tests on mummified humans in Egypt who perished around 300 BC in Alexandria, determine European ancestry and then say "the Ancient Egyptians were White". The testing was 100% accurate, the application of the scientific method was 100% accurate BUT the entire premise was faulty because I applied the science in time period where Europeans invaded and in an area where there was a high concentration of them. At the end of the day, Dinosaurs existing is inconsequential at least to me so I don't really care if it's true or false. However to pretend as if it's 100% true because "SCIENCE" is simply bullshyt.
The Internet is really making people become anti-knowledge and anti-science.
They're more similar than you thinkI think the thing they get wrong determines the amount of graciousness we apply. Thinking the Earth was flat at one point and then changing your stance under the face of new data is different then let's say having science conclude the supposed inferiority of people of African descent. Science has consequences and so I don't give a blanket benefit of the doubt as the proponents of science are human beings just as much as the propagators of dogmatism.
So you can't directly prove it happenedGoing by what geologist say.