Ah yes, the good old let's take hyperbolic words literally in order to try to cling to some semblance of a point
. How exactly do the numbers you posted (from 1 season for each guy out of two 20 year careers) demonstrate that KG had superior range?
with the excuses. Great defensive anchors make shyt easier for the people around them, not the other way around. Hibbert had the Pacers in the top 10 in defense a couple years ago with George out for the year and Stephenson in Charlotte. Duncan has chips and top defenses without each of those individuals. Can all of them say the same?
Did you not say TD was "automatic" from midrange? I can do that for any season dog, KG's midrange game is far beyond TD's, you really letting some bank shots fool you? Tim Duncan is
not a better shooter than Kevin Garnett. KG made more threes on a higher percentage in his career, KG was a better FT shooter with a 10% disparity in career FT shooting, KG had the better midrange game and smoother mechanics on his shot and he had more range.
I'm looking at Duncan's '06 shooting chart and dude was garbage from midrange
'06 TD from 10-16 feet: 87 0f 231 (37.7%)
'06 TD from 16 ft. to 3PT line: 58 of 183 (31.7%)
He was not better than KG as a shooter and he was not automatic.
Also, TD played with a mixture of those individuals throughout his career. He always played with strong defenders around him with a strong defensive coach. KG was playing with defenders like Wally World and lil Troy Hudson, and his teams were more offensive minded. His defensive impact on those teams was huge, they would be bottom of the league without him. D-Rob is actually the one who led the Spurs in defensive box plus minus in '98, '99, '00, '01, and he was an elite defender up to his retirement. TD had better defensive coaching and better defensive players around him, when KG went to Boston he won DPoY and anchored some of the greatest defenses of All-Time. This can't be ignored.