You still didn’t answer the question. If a former NBA player were to disagree with you saying Steph wouldn’t average more than 16 and be no better than BJ Armstrong, would you say that you’re wrong and they’re right off GP?
Also KG & Paul haven’t been active NBA players since 2016 & 2017 respectively. They have never played with or against a lot of the great players of this current era. So using that same logic, how can they speak on someone like Ant’s game when they have as much experience playing against him as a Coli poster?
I did answer your question, you didn't like the answer, nor could you counter it with a stronger point.
Just like I told the other breh, KOBE average 8 points in 1996 in his rookie season and played 71 games, He was a 2 guard, much bigger than Curry, rookie season,
So you wanna sit up and tell me that Curry who is much smaller, can't guard, would average more than KOBE who had all the Hype coming out of HS?? He was much better than Curry coming out of HS also and he only put up 8 points a game in the NBA,
Even KOBE said that he had to get stronger after 1997, but you expect me to believe Curry will be putting up Numbers in 1994, a league that was much brutal?
How I know KOBE was better than Curry at 18 vs Curry at 18, well, KOBE came straight out of HS, Curry didn't and had NOOOOO chance of turning pro after his SR year in HS, KOBE could have went DUke or any of the TOP PROGRAMS IN THE COUNTRY, Curry had maybe 1 offer and none from the Big Boys, too small
So if the college coaches, Big time programs did NOT recruit Curry, what make you think he would put up numbers MORE THAN BJ ARMSTRONG In 1994??
Make the shyt make sense breh