ultraflexed
Superstar
Malcom X never said once in his life that a suit would protect him or that it made him better than other brothers who dress differently
But that's not what Kevin is saying either so what's your point .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe1da/fe1dae61ab13558db7ae1f49b936c14fc4796dd6" alt="jbhmm :jbhmm: :jbhmm:"
Malcom X never said once in his life that a suit would protect him or that it made him better than other brothers who dress differently
Black men focus too much on fashion imo
Focus on building together instead.
No other group of men focuses so much of their energy on fashion and materialism as we do.
The real question is why is it so uncommon for black men to work together towards a common goal and purpose. Asians do it. Mexicans do it. Arabs do it. Whites did it. Hyper individualism only works if you already got it like that. And last I check we're at the bottom and falling further and further behind. I doubt our "image" is the common demoninator. Putting on some silly shyt made by European fashion designers wont produce a fukking thing. You're just a member of racial group in steep deline in a $500 outfit.
So... porque no los dos? What are you even arguing? A c00n gon be a c00n regardless of what he's wearing. He would be just as much of a c00n in some j's.This is literally what I said in my post. The motivation of you dressing up will dictate if you dress up and know who you still are or dress up and think you’re something different.
nikkas was the flyest under Jim Crow. Clearly didn’t help
Because the US Government at all levels isn’t interfering with their internal politic. As long as those groups get on the anti-Black train, they will be given a lane to rock with in the USA. That’s why we have Asian and LGBT protection executive orders in the first 100 days of the Biden administration but nothing for Black Americans who experience more hate than both groups combined.
Data.Black marriage rate was 80%
The black men were more employed at a higher %.
And black home ownership was double what it is now
That's what this thread and op (and a lot of u in here) are implying lolBut that's not what Kevin is saying either so what's your point .![]()
That's what this thread and op (and a lot of u in here) are implying lol
So this had nothing to do with shifts in the economy, factories getting outsourced, hyper Information age etc...instead it was the wool suits all along. Simpler times makes for simpler livingBlack marriage rate was 80%
The black men were more employed at a higher %.
And black home ownership was double what it is now
Black marriage rate was 80%
The black men were more employed at a higher %.
And black home ownership was double what it is now
So all that declined cause nikkas took suits off?Black marriage rate was 80%
The black men were more employed at a higher %.
And black home ownership was double what it is now
So... porque no los dos? What are you even arguing? A c00n gon be a c00n regardless of what he's wearing. He would be just as much of a c00n in some j's.
Black marriage rate was 80%
The black men were more employed at a higher %.
And black home ownership was double what it is now
Look dawg no diss but where have u been the last 160 years?? All nikkas do is help each other for the most partYou make valid points and its even more of a reason why we shouldn't be so concerned about fashion. We have far bigger fish to fry as a people. Wearing suits isn't going to cut it. We need to get our hands dirty, leave our pride at the door and work together.