the video I posted contains a lot of shyt in it besides that, but you can easily find it through google because its physical evidence
so its not hard to find this is an example
Ken Ham will debate Bill Nye
- Thread starter DEAD7
- Start date
the video I posted contains a lot of shyt in it besides that, but you can easily find it through google because its physical evidence
so its not hard to find this is an example
How exactly is this video related to what you were talking about?
Did you watch it, better yet just read the description
Okay, I watched and read the description of the video. What is the justification that the flood that happened there was the biblical flood?
It's not, the fact that ruins like this are found all over the world, and every ancient civilization ever discovered as documented their being a flood
so obviously a FLOOD did happen, there's more evidence the flood happened than it did not happen, using science, so I don't understand people's dismissive arguments
Yes but that's because floods happen around the world! That doesn't mean that they're all talking about the same event that happened at the same time. It's not extraordinary to me for ancient civs to be reporting floods when we KNOW floods happen around the world at various times. What IS extraordinary is people like you claiming these people are talking about the SAME flood around the world at the same time. That needs a little bit more justification than a clip about ancient ruins in Africa.
But the evidence shows the age of the rocks are around the same in that video in nearly all the cases, that is compelling
all you gotta do is type ancient civilizations great flood, you start reading, you in cross reference from there and come to your own conclusion
the fact is a great flood did happen in ancient times, that is not fiction
matter of fact show me some evidence the flood didn't happen
I won't hold my breath
You can't disprove a negative. That's like saying disprove god didn't create the universe.
What I'm saying is what you're suggesting is an isolated event, and the story was passed on to different people. There might have been a flood in that region which the stories are based upon ... I don't deny that there were major floods back then. But that doesn't mean that same flood was also in the Americas, East Asia and so on. Furthermore, there's no way someone could justify that it was from a particular god to wash away the sinful people of the earth. If someone has evidence that could pinpoint multiple pieces of evidence to an event like this during the same year (which, I'm not even sure if we have the tools to do so) then that would be something. But I think it's much more likely civs adopted a flood myth rather than it happening exactly as it's told in the bible.
Then why is the concept of a great flood so unbelievable to you then, why is the bible so ridiculous if you even admit the this floods happen all over the Earth
Also the Bible takes place in Africa, and this flood is documented by every civilization that has ever existed on the continent. Look up the ruins the found in east Africa I'm tired of doing work for you, Ethiopia and ETHIOPIAN ARE MENTIONED IN THE PEOPLE NUMEROUS TIMES
Europe, asia, and every other place is NOT so we talking about Africa here when we talk about the bible
If Ethiopia is called Ethiopia today and it was called that in the Bible, then all that bullshyt they say about the middle east , turkey, and what not is bullshyt
Um... because worldwide floods don't happen.
*edit*
The bible's ridiculous because it adds supernatural things, which we can't confirm actually happened. I'm perfectly fine accepting some events in the bible might be based on actual things. There might have been some Jewish rabbi named yesuwa that was crucified for speaking against the church and government. Do I think he rose from the dead 3 days later? ... of course not.
