Kavanaugh SCOTUS Thread! Senate Confirms by 50-48 Vote Margin; Kavanaugh Sworn-In

wtfyomom

All Star
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
7,696
Reputation
-757
Daps
11,425
Reppin
NULL
no surprise, i knew hed get through, they tried to shame a repub majority to not vote him in, FAIL. these people are ruthless they dont give a fukk. But when Obama nominates a fukkin centrist he doesnt get through, Dems need to stop playing by the rules or this shyt will continue, even when they flip the house so what? all theyre gonna do is stop the bleeding, they not gonna repeal or change anything, i dont want to hear theres nothing they could do when republicans constantly break the rules or make up shyt to get what they want. p*ssy ass dems. our SC will be far right for years to come
 

Baka's Weird Case

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2015
Messages
15,748
Reputation
6,831
Daps
76,973
Reppin
Goon Squad - Catset
You need 67 Senators to remove a SCOTUS Justice.

Even if Dems got the majority, it ain’t happening
cant they hold investigations in the house? if they dont have a majority of seats in the senate theyre unlikely to be able to pass legislation. i would support the dems in that case focusing energy on investigating these sexual assault claims more. if they can make a public case that he committed perjury, especially as the mueller investigation drops, they might be able to create enough public pressure to force them to impeach kavanaugh.
 

UserNameless

Veteran
Joined
Nov 22, 2012
Messages
36,629
Reputation
3,380
Daps
65,942
Reppin
Everywhere...You never there.
All this show about an “investigation” and nothing really happens. fukk congress man...


Can’t beleive this thread got all these pages for this bullshyt... tried to pull a crude hit job, capitalizing off MeToo and it didn’t work ... Dems gotta restrategize . Lookin like amateur hour outchea . I mean this shyt ain’t even imaginative or savvy anymore :hhh:
 

StatUS

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
27,751
Reputation
1,720
Daps
60,350
Reppin
Everywhere
Some of y'all need to go through history and see that it's not normal for a judge to be confirmed by such a slim margin. This is the type of missed nuance that has people saying that voting doesn't matter. Stop worrying about metoo, or Democrat mistakes, or impeachment and look at what's going on with the enemy.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,259
Daps
616,281
Reppin
The Deep State

Opinion | White Women, Come Get Your People
White Women, Come Get Your People
They will defend their privilege to the death.
Oct. 6, 2018
Please disable your ad blocker.

Advertising helps fund Times journalism.

By Alexis Grenell

Ms. Grenell has written on gender and politics for The New York Daily News, The Washington Post and other outlets.

06Grennell1-articleLarge.jpg

Senator Susan Collins of Maine walking to the Senate floor on Friday. Her support of Brett Kavanaugh helped elevate him to the Supreme Court.Drew Angerer/Getty Images
merlin_144875268_d037ec65-75bd-490f-afe5-d2bb889764f7-articleLarge.jpg

Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska on Friday. She broke with her fellow Republicans and did not support the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh.J. Scott Applewhite/Associated Press
After a confirmation process where women all but slit their wrists, letting their stories of sexual trauma run like rivers of blood through the Capitol, the Senate still voted to confirm Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. With the exception of Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, all the women in the Republican conference caved, including Senator Susan Collins of Maine, who held out until the bitter end.

These women are gender traitors, to borrow a term from the dystopian TV series “The Handmaid’s Tale.” They’ve made standing by the patriarchy a full-time job. The women who support them show up at the Capitol wearing “Women for Kavanaugh” T-shirts, but also probably tell their daughters to put on less revealing clothes when they go out.

They’re more sympathetic to Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah, who actually shooed away a crowd of women and told them to “grow up.” Or Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, whose response to a woman telling him she was raped was: “I’m sorry. Call the cops.”

These are the kind of women who think that being falsely accused of rape is almost as bad as being raped. The kind of women who agree with President Trump that “it’s a very scary time for young men in America,” which he said during a news conference on Tuesday.

Please disable your ad blocker.

Advertising helps fund Times journalism.

But the people who scare me the most are the mothers, sisters and wives of those young men, because my stupid uterus still holds out some insane hope of solidarity.

We’re talking about white women. The same 53 percent who put their racial privilege ahead of their second-class gender status in 2016 by voting to uphold a system that values only their whiteness, just as they have for decades. White women have broken for Democratic presidential candidates only twice: in the 1964 and 1996 elections, according to an analysis by Jane Junn, a political scientist at the University of Southern California.

Women of color, and specifically black women, make the margin of difference for Democrats. The voting patterns of white women and white men mirror each other much more closely, and they tend to cast their ballots for Republicans. The gender gap in politics is really a color line.

That’s because white women benefit from patriarchy by trading on their whiteness to monopolize resources for mutual gain. In return they’re placed on a pedestal to be “cherished and revered,” as Speaker Paul D. Ryan has said about women, but all the while denied basic rights.

This elevated position over women of color comes at a cost, though. Consider what Kellyanne Conway, a top adviser to the president, said at a dinner last year for New York’s Conservative Party. She suggested that higher birthrates are “how I think we fight these demographic wars moving forward.” The war, of course, is with non-white people. So it seems that white women are expected to support the patriarchy by marrying within their racial group, reproducing whiteness and even minimizing violence against their own bodies.

Please disable your ad blocker.

Advertising helps fund Times journalism.

Recently, Ms. Conway even weaponized her own alleged sexual assault in service to her boss by discouraging women from feeling empathy with Christine Blasey Ford or anger at Judge Kavanaugh.

Ms. Conway knows that a woman who steps out of line may be ridiculed by the president himself. President Trump mocked Dr. Blasey in front of a cheering crowd on Tuesday evening. Betray the patriarchy and your whiteness won’t save you.

The pedestal is a superior, if precarious, place. For white women, it’s apparently better than being “stronger together,” with the 94 percent of black women and 86 percent of Latinas who voted for Hillary Clinton.

During the 2016 presidential election, did white women really vote with their whiteness in mind? Lorrie Frasure-Yokley, a political scientist at U.C.L.A., recently measured the effect of racial identity on white women’s willingness to support Trump in 2016 and found a positive and statistically significant relationship. So white women who voted for him did so to prop up their whiteness.

In the study, white women who agreed that “many women interpret innocent remarks or acts as sexist” were 17 percent more likely to vote for a Republican candidate. They were also likely to agree that “blacks should work their way up without special favors.” To be sure, women of color aren’t inherently less sexist or even without their own racial biases. But unlike white women, they can’t use race privilege to their advantage.

This blood pact between white men and white women is at issue in the November midterms. President Trump knows it, and at that Tuesday news conference, he signaled to white women to hold the line: “The people that have complained to me about it the most about what’s happening are women. Women are very angry,” he said. “I have men that don’t like it, but I have women that are incensed at what’s going on.”

I’m sure he does “have” them; game girls will defend their privilege to the death.

But apparently that doesn’t include Ms. Murkowski anymore. Maybe it’s because she comes from a state with the nation’s highest rate of sexual violence, with a sexual assault rate three times the national average, where prosecutors just let a man evade jail time after he kidnapped a native Alaskan woman and strangled her unconscious, then masturbated over her body. Maybe.

Meanwhile, Senator Collins subjected us to a slow funeral dirge about due process and some other nonsense I couldn’t even hear through my rage headache as she announced on Friday she would vote to confirm Judge Kavanaugh. Her mostly male colleagues applauded her.

The question for white women in November is: Which one of these two women are you?

I fear we already know the answer.

RELATED

More views on the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Alexis Grenell (@agrenell) is a co-founder of Pythia Public, a political and public affairs firm.

Correction: October 6, 2018
An earlier version of this Opinion essay misspelled the given name of a senator from South Carolina. He is Lindsey Graham, not Lindsay.

Subscribe now. Just $15.99 $9.99 a month.
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
71,491
Reputation
8,132
Daps
216,257
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
cant they hold investigations in the house? if they dont have a majority of seats in the senate theyre unlikely to be able to pass legislation. i would support the dems in that case focusing energy on investigating these sexual assault claims more. if they can make a public case that he committed perjury, especially as the mueller investigation drops, they might be able to create enough public pressure to force them to impeach kavanaugh.

IF they win the House, sure they can do their own investigation
 
Top